REaCT-vascular Access Her2 Negative Vascular Access Strategies for (Neo) Adjuvant Breast Cancer Treatment Without Trastuzumab (OTT 15-07)

September 3, 2019 updated by: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Simple, Prospective and Randomized Trial to Obtain Answers to Questions of Standard of Care: Vascular Access Strategies for (Neo) Adjuvant Breast Cancer Treatment Without Trastuzumab: A Study From the REthinking Clinical Trials Program (REaCT-vascular Access Her2 Negative).

In the REaCT-Vascular Access Her2 negative study, the investigator will use a novel method to allow comparisons of established standard of care vascular access strategies using the "integrated consent model" as part of a pragmatic clinical trial.

Determining the optimal vascular access strategy remains an important medical issue for patients, nurses, physicians and society. A novel method to allow comparison of established standards of care is needed as part of an increasing internationally mandated incentive to perform more pragmatic clinic trials.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1H 8L6
        • The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically confirmed primary breast cancer
  • Planned to start either FEC-D, AC-D, dose-dense AC-T, TAC, or TC chemotherapy, in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting.
  • ≥19 years of age
  • Able to provide verbal consent

Exclusion Criteria:

• Contraindication to central line placement.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Venous access PORT or PICC
Participants will receive a central line placement either a PORT or a PICC prior to the initiation of chemotherapy.
Participants will receive a venous access prior to starting chemotherapy
No Intervention: No intervention
Participants will only receive a central line if required once chemotherapy has been initiated.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accrual rates
Time Frame: One year
Percentage of patients who receive (neo)adjuvant IV systemic therapy for Her 2 negative breast cancer compared to the number of participants who agree to randomization. The total number of new patients receiving (neo) adjuvant IV systemic cytotoxic therapy will be provided by the local chemotherapy pharmacy and Oncology Patient Information System records.
One year
Patient compliance
Time Frame: One year
Percentage of participants who are randomized who accept randomization, and percentage of patients who cross-over to receive a central line while on study will be calculated using the chemotherapy treatment documentation in the designated hospital electronic patient record program
One year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physician engagement
Time Frame: One year
Percentage of medical oncologists who have agreed to participate in the trial compared to the percentage who approached patients regarding the trial.
One year
Rates of thrombotic events
Time Frame: One year
2. Rates of documented thrombotic events need for anticoagulation, line infections, phlebitis, and extravasations during chemotherapy.
One year
Number of attempts at cannulation
Time Frame: One year
3. For those patients randomised to peripheral access information on the number of attempts at cannulation will be collected and site of cannulation. (ipsilateral to surgery vs contralateral to surgery)
One year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 18, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

February 23, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 6, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 3, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 20160006-01H

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Clinical Trials on venous access PORT or PICC

Subscribe