Trial Comparing Proximal Tibia and Proximal Humerus Infusion Rates Using the NIO Intraosseous Device (IOACS)

March 16, 2016 updated by: Łukasz Szarpak, Medical University of Warsaw

A Randomized Crossover Cadaver Trial Comparing Proximal Tibia and Proximal Humerus Infusion Rates Using the NIO Intraosseous Device During Simulated Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Performed by Paramedics

The investigators sought to compare the intraosseous access success rates of the proximal tibia and the proximal humerus using new Intraosseous access device "NIO" in an adult cadaver model during simulated resuscitation.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

84

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Masovia
      • Warsaw, Masovia, Poland, 02-005
        • Medical University of Warsaw, Department of Emergency Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • give voluntary consent to participate in the study
  • paramedics
  • without previous experience in intraosseous devices

Exclusion Criteria:

  • not meet the above criteria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Proximal tibia
Assumption of intraosseous access into the proximal tibia. Simulation of continous resuscitation was carried out using a system of chest compression LifeLine ARM.
Intraosseous access device NIO (Defibtech)
Experimental: Proximal humerus
Assumption of intraosseous access into the proximal humerus. Simulation of continous resuscitation was carried out using a system of chest compression LifeLine ARM.
Intraosseous access device NIO (Defibtech)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Success rate
Time Frame: 1 day
Success rate of IO cannulation was defined as successful administration of infusion solutions via the performed IO access. Failure was defined as extravasation or unsuccessful (first) effort of IO insertion.
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time of IO insertion
Time Frame: 1 day
Procedure time was defined as the duration of picking up the prepared set of IO device from the shelf, preparation of the access set and patients' insertion site including disinfection and draping, insertion procedure of the cannula itself, assembling of the access set and first successful administration of drugs or infusion solutions through the newly established vascular access. The time taken for each infusion attempt was measured offline while reviewing procedures by videotape, and subsequently entered into a computer spreadsheet. Times were measured in seconds.
1 day
Ease-of-use
Time Frame: 1 day
ease-of-use of the NIO in tibia and humerus using a five-point Likert Scale ("the device is easy to use"; 1-strongly disagree, 2-disagree, 3-neither agree nor disagree, 4-agree, 5-strongly agree).
1 day
first location
Time Frame: 1 day
Participants were asked to record their "first location access" tibia or humerus
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 15, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

March 7, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 17, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2016

Last Verified

March 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 02.006.1MR

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Resuscitation

Clinical Trials on NIO

Subscribe