Doppler Ultrasound Compared With Stethoscope to Assess Heart Rate (HR)

January 5, 2022 updated by: Columbia University

A Randomized-Controlled Trial of Handheld Doppler Ultrasound Compared With Auscultation by Stethoscope to Assess Heart Rate During the Resuscitation of High-risk Neonates

This is a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing heart rate measurement by Doppler ultrasound or auscultation with a stethoscope in newborn infants who require stabilization or resuscitation immediately after birth. Enrolled subjects will be randomly assigned to have their heart rate (HR) obtained by stethoscope (ST) or by Doppler ultrasound (DO). Neonates will be resuscitated in accordance with the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) guidelines.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Obtaining a baby's heart rate (HR) is an important part of neonatal resuscitation in the delivery room and helps the medical team decide how to treat the baby. When babies do not breathe well on their own, the medical team places electrocardiogram (ECG) leads on the baby's chest to obtain an accurate HR rapidly that can be seen by the entire team. Before the ECG leads are placed on the baby's chest, the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) guidelines suggest that medical team members listen to the baby's HR using a stethoscope for 6 seconds. However, it can take longer than 6 seconds for medical team members to obtain a HR which can delay a baby's care. The purpose of this study is to determine if Doppler ultrasound is a useful, alternative tool, aside from a stethoscope, that can be used to quickly obtain a baby's HR, particularly in high-risk babies. The primary objective will be the time that it takes to obtain a baby's HR by Doppler ultrasound as compared to listening to a baby's HR with a stethoscope. With this study, the investigators will be able to understand if Doppler ultrasound is a useful tool in the resuscitation of babies who are high risk.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia University Irving Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 second to 1 hour (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All neonates admitted to the transitional nursery for resuscitation after delivery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neonates with congenital heart disease, congenital diaphragmatic hernia
  • Neonates whose mothers present and will have imminent delivery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Doppler ultrasound
Placement of Doppler US on chest to obtain newborn's heart rate.
Handheld fetal doppler ultrasound will be used to assess heart rate in high-risk neonates.
No Intervention: Stethoscope
Placement of stethoscope on chest to obtain newborn's heart rate.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to obtain HR (in seconds)
Time Frame: Up to approximately 1 minute
The primary outcome will be the time to obtain heart rate (HR), which will be defined as the time from when the neonate is placed on the radiant warmer to the time the HR is indicated to the entire resuscitation team.
Up to approximately 1 minute

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tina Leone A. Leone, MD, Columbia University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 17, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 13, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

October 13, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 23, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

January 27, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 10, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AAAS5205

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neonatal Resuscitation

Clinical Trials on Handheld fetal doppler ultrasound

3
Subscribe