Perinatal Tissue Mesenchyme Stem Cells in the Treatment for Caesarean Section Scars

May 6, 2019 updated by: Zhengping Liu, MD, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Foshan

A Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Perinatal Tissue Mesenchyme Stem Cells in the Treatment for Caesarean Section Scars

The study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of perinatal tissue mesenchyme stem cells treatment on the appearance of a caesarean scar as compared to a similar untreated scar.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Nowadays, cesarean is one of the most common surgical interventions and its prevalence has increased in most countries in the recent years. Delay in healing of cesarean wound and formation of visible scar are common symptoms of maternal morbidity after cesarean section. These complications affect mother's quality of life due to stress, anxiety, delay in mother's ability and health recovery, and also they are associated with additional cost as a result of the increased need for wide spectrum antibiotics and sometimes hospitalization and repeated repair of wound. Improve the final aspect of would and visible scars, have been a challenge for medicine. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) are a population of pluripotent stem cells that are self-renewing and capable of differentiating into canonical cells of the mesenchyme. Recently, stem cells have been applied to regenerative medicine, even for internal organs such as blood vessels, nerves, and heart.

The study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of perinatal tissue mesenchyme stem cells treatment on the appearance of a caesarean scar as compared to a similar untreated scar. This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of perinatal tissue mesenchyme stem cells (MSC) treatment on the appearance of a caesarean scar as compared to a similar untreated scar. A total of ninety (90) participants will be randomized (1:1:1) to receive MSC or placebo. All of participants will be undergoing delivery by lower segment caesarean section through a transverse abdominal incision, and there will be no clear indication for a particular surgical technique or material to be used. In low-dose MSC group, participants will receive transdermal one dose of 1*10^6 cells of Perinatal Tissue Mesenchyme Stem Cells in the gel once a day for continuous three days and then receive transdermal placebo without of Perinatal Tissue Mesenchyme Stem Cells in the gel once a day for continuous next three days; In high-dose MSC group, participants will receive transdermal one dose of 1*10^6 cells of Perinatal Tissue Mesenchyme Stem Cells in the gel once a day for continuous six days; And in placebo group, participants will receive transdermal placebo without of Perinatal Tissue Mesenchyme Stem Cells in the gel once a day for continuous six days. After randomization, baseline data, and transdermal treatment, participants will be followed up at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months. For the purpose of the endpoint analysis and safety evaluations, the investigators will utilize an "intention-to-treat" study population.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Foshan, Guangdong, China, 528000
        • Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Foshan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 35 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Primiparous women receiving cesarean delivery
  • Ages between 21-35 years
  • Gestation ages ≥ 37 weeks and < 42 weeks
  • Willing to give and sign an informed consent form and a photographic release form
  • Willing to comply with study dosing and complete the entire course of the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any systemic uncontrolled disease
  • Recent or current cancer
  • History or presenting with a keloid formation
  • Wounds or local disease in treatment area
  • Planning any other cosmetic procedure to the study area during the study period
  • Smoking

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Mesenchymal Stem Cells low-dose group
Target dose of 3 million Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Participants will receive transdermal one dose of 1*10^6 cells of Perinatal Tissue Mesenchyme Stem Cells in the gel once a day for continuous three days and then receive transdermal placebo without of Perinatal Tissue Mesenchyme Stem Cells in the gel once a day for continuous next three days.
EXPERIMENTAL: Mesenchymal Stem Cells high-dose group
Target dose of 6 million Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Participants will receive transdermal one dose of 1*10^6 cells of Perinatal Tissue Mesenchyme Stem Cells in the gel once a day for continuous six days.
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo
Placebo without Mesenchyme Stem Cells
Participants will receive transdermal placebo without of Perinatal Tissue Mesenchyme Stem Cells in the gel once a day for continuous six days.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS)
Time Frame: 1st, 3rd, 6th month post treatment
The investigators measured quartile grading scale at 1st, 3rd and 6th months of study and evaluated the change of the scale
1st, 3rd, 6th month post treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Wound healing status
Time Frame: 14 days post surgery
Wound healing status was assessed using REEDA scale which is based on the amount of redness, edema, ecchymosis, discharge and the approximation of wound edges (each one scored between 0-3); the final score was the sum of the items scores. Lower score indicated better healing.
14 days post surgery
Erythema measured by reflectance
Time Frame: 1st, 3rd, 6th month post treatment
measured by reflectance
1st, 3rd, 6th month post treatment
Pigmentation measured by reflectance
Time Frame: 1st, 3rd, 6th months post treatment
measured by reflectance
1st, 3rd, 6th months post treatment
Scar Thickness and Uniformity
Time Frame: 1st, 3rd, 6th month post treatment
A High Definition Ultrasound (US) device will be used to generate a high resolution image of the skin layers of the treated and non-treated scar in order to measure and compare changes in scar thickness and uniformity.
1st, 3rd, 6th month post treatment
Change of scar area
Time Frame: 1st, 3rd, 6th month post treatment
A High Definition Ultrasound (US) device will be used to generate a high resolution image of the skin layers of the treated and non-treated scar in order to measure and compare changes in scar area.
1st, 3rd, 6th month post treatment
Immunoglobulin concentrations in breast milk
Time Frame: 1st, 3rd, 6th month post treatment
Breast milk immunoglobulin (IgG, IgA, IgM) and the complement (C3, C4) were detected by transmission immune turbidity method using automatic biochemical analyzer.
1st, 3rd, 6th month post treatment
Subject's satisfaction
Time Frame: 6th month post treatment
Subject's satisfaction of the treatment using a Satisfaction Scale as follows: None; Slight; Moderate; Good; Very Good.
6th month post treatment
Adverse events occurrence
Time Frame: 6 months
Adverse events will be evaluated since the baseline visit until 6 months after the end of the treatment.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 10, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

May 13, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 7, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2019

Last Verified

May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MCHHFoshan-1602

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cicatrix

Clinical Trials on Mesenchyme Stem Cells low-dose group

Subscribe