A Study to Evaluate PEMF Therapy on Experimentally Inducted Pain in Subjects With Painful Peripheral Diabetic Neuropathy

A Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Double-Blind, Crossover Study to Evaluate PEMF Therapy on Pain Sensitivity to Different Qualities of Experimentally Induced Pain in Subjects With Painful Peripheral Diabetic Neuropathy

Evaluate the effectiveness of the Provant Therapy System compared to sham on pain sensitivity and nervous system response to various qualities of experimentally induced pain in the upper and lower extremities of subjects with painful peripheral diabetic neuropathy.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Painful Peripheral Diabetic Neuropathy
• Intervention / Treatment: Device: Provant

Detailed Description

This is a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled crossover clinical trial conducted on subjects with painful peripheral diabetic neuropathy. Eligible subjects will include those between 22 and 80 years of age with Type 2 diabetes having persistent pain, numbness, tingling, and/or burning in at least one foot. Pain threshold, tolerance to thermal stimuli and pressure response to the induced pain stimuli will be measured at three time points using five standardized experimental pain measures: baseline, after a single 30 minute treatment with active PEMF or sham treatment and after a second 30 minute treatment with active PEMF or sham treatment. Eligible subjects with painful peripheral diabetic neuropathy will undergo Diabetic Screening (Nerve Conduction Velocity, Skin Perfusion Pressure, Ankle-Brachial Index, and Vibratory Testing) in the index foot prior to randomization. Following the Diabetic Screening tests, subjects will return to the research center for the Enrollment/Randomization Visit and complete measures of pain by completing the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and functional assessments. Subjects will then be randomly assigned to one of the two groups; control (sham) or experimental (active) device by a research assistant blinded to the device status. Patients will also be randomly assigned to the sequence order of experimental induced pain tests. The ischemic pain testing (SMET) will always be conducted last. Patients will return to the research center within 7 days after the Enrollment/Randomization Visit where they will be crossed over to the other treatment assignment and be randomly assigned to the sequence order of experimental induced pain tests on the same extremity as previously randomized.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 41
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Texas
    • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78215
      • Sun Research Institute
    • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78217
      • Multi-Phase Trials, LLC

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 22 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Subject age is greater than or equal to 22 years and less than 80 years of age.
2. Subject has documented Type 2 diabetes.
3. Subject's BMI ≤ 38.
4. Subject has peripheral diabetic neuropathy with pain, numbness, tingling, and/or burning in at least one foot.
5. Subject is in pain Phase 2, 3, or 4 (Appendix B).
6. Subject is willing to forego smoking during the Enrollment Visit and Visit 3 (Crossover) for 4 hours prior to and through the duration of testing (~5 hours).
7. Subject is willing and able to give written informed consent and to comply with all parts of the study protocol.
8. Female subjects must be post-menopausal, surgically sterile, abstinent, or practicing (or agree to practice) an effective method of birth control if they are sexually active for the duration of the study. (Effective methods of birth control include prescription hormonal contraceptives, intrauterine devices, double-barrier methods, and/or male partner sterilization).
9. Subject is able to eat in the morning prior to the induced pain tests and provide a meal/snacks for themselves during the day to maintain blood sugar levels.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Subject has current pain other than their painful peripheral diabetic neuropathy.
2. Subject has a concomitant medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would confound the ability to conduct induced pain testing in the upper and lower extremities.
3. Subject has taken prescription opioids for their pain within 30 days of the Screening Visit or 6 weeks of Screening for long acting medications.
4. Subject has used topical capsaicin within 30 days of the Screening Visit.
5. Subject has Type 1 diabetes.
6. Subject is in pain Phase 1 or 5 (Appendix B).
7. Subject has an active, open ulcer on either lower extremity of arterial, venous or mixed disease origin.
8. Subject has peripheral arterial disease as determined by an Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI) of <0.5 or > 1.4. See Appendix C for details on obtaining the ABI.
9. Subject has venous insufficiency classified by the Venous Insufficiency Classification System (CEAP) of grade C6. See Appendix D for description of the venous insufficiency grading.
10. Subject has an unhealed surgery on the legs, feet, arms or hands.
11. Subject has smoked within 4 hours of the Screening Visit.
12. Subject has received any investigational drug or device within 30 days or 5 half-lives of the drug, whichever is longer, prior to the Screening Visit or is enrolled in another clinical trial.
13. Subject has used systemic corticosteroids within 2 months of the Screening Visit.
14. Subject has a history of a solid tumor that is not in complete remission for greater than 2 years other than successfully treated non-metastatic basal cell or squamous cell carcinomas of the skin in the treatment area.
15. Subject has a serious psychosocial co-morbidity.
16. Subject has a self-reported history of drug or alcohol abuse, within one year prior to the Screening Visit.
17. Subject has an implanted pacemaker, defibrillator, neurostimulator, spinal cord stimulator, bone stimulator, cochlear implant, or other implanted device with an implanted metal lead(s).
18. Subject is currently pregnant.
19. Subject has been previously treated with the PROVANT Therapy System within 30 days of the Enrollment Visit.
20. Subject is unwilling or unable to follow study instructions.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
• Masking: TRIPLE

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
OTHER: Sham of Provant; Sham of Provant Therapy System	Device: Provant
OTHER: Active Provant; Active Provant Treatment	Device: Provant

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Upper Extremity - Pain Sensitivity to Various Experimentally Induced Pain Stimuli	Response data by induced pain stimuli after the initial treatment with the study device in the upper extremity. The stimuli / test was determined to either favor sham or favor Provant Therapy. This included a total of 20 stimuli/tests (comparing pre-treatment to post initial treatment results) as follows: Cuff Pain Threshold (greater decrease favored), Cuff Pain Tolerance (smaller increase favored), Cuff Pressure Threshold (greater decrease favored), Pressure Tolerance (greater increase favored), Mechanical Pain Threshold (greater decrease favored), Biothesiomety (greater decrease favored) on the forearm, palm, thumb, index finger, middle finger, ring finger and pinky finger, Heat Tolerance (greater decrease favored), Cold Tolerance (greater decrease favored), Pain (greater increase favored), Time to Pain (greater increase favored), Pain Tolerance Grip Strength (greater increase favored) and Final Pain (greater decrease favored).	4 weeks
Lower Extremity - Pain Sensitivity to Various Experimentally Induced Pain Stimuli	Response data by induced pain stimuli after the initial treatment with the study device in the upper extremity. The stimuli / test was determined to either favor sham or favor Provant Therapy. This included a total of 20 stimuli/tests (comparing pre-treatment to post initial treatment results) as follows: Cuff Pain Threshold (greater decrease favored), Cuff Pain Tolerance (smaller increase favored), Cuff Pressure Threshold (greater decrease favored), Pressure Tolerance (greater increase favored), Mechanical Pain Threshold (greater decrease favored), Biothesiomety (greater decrease favored) on the forearm, palm, thumb, index finger, middle finger, ring finger and pinky finger, Heat Tolerance (greater decrease favored), Cold Tolerance (greater decrease favored), Pain (greater increase favored), Time to Pain (greater increase favored), Pain Tolerance Grip Strength (greater increase favored) and Final Pain (greater decrease favored). .	4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Regenesis Biomedical, Inc.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: June 1, 2016
• Primary Completion (ACTUAL): August 1, 2016
• Study Completion (ACTUAL): August 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: June 20, 2016
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: June 20, 2016
• First Posted (ESTIMATE): June 22, 2016

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (ACTUAL): March 31, 2017
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 1, 2017
• Last Verified: October 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Nervous System Diseases; Neurologic Manifestations; Endocrine System Diseases; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus; Neuromuscular Diseases; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases; Pain; Diabetic Neuropathies
• Other Study ID Numbers: RBI.2016.002

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO