Effective Maneuver for Post-laparoscopic Shoulder Pain

May 7, 2018 updated by: Kyoungho Ryu, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital

The Effective Maneuver to Reduce Shoulder Pain After Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery: Randomized Controlled Trial

The aim of this clinical trial is to estimate the efficacy and safety of combined intervention with the intra-peritoneal normal saline instillation and pulmonary recruitment maneuver for reducing post-laparoscopic shoulder pain.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Shoulder pain after laparoscopy is common and its probable mechanism is residual carbon dioxide gas after surgery. Both the intra-peritoneal normal saline instillation and pulmonary recruitment maneuver could effectively reduce post-laparoscopic shoulder pain. However, the efficacy and safety of combined intervention with normal saline instillation and pulmonary recruitment maneuver have not been investigated yet. The aim of this clinical trial is to estimate the effectiveness of combined intervention with the intra-peritoneal normal saline instillation and pulmonary recruitment maneuver for reducing post-laparoscopic shoulder pain.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

144

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients undergoing laparoscopy for benign gynecologic diseases
  • patients aged 19-65 years
  • patients with american society of anesthesiology physical status I-II
  • patients obtaining written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with chronic shoulder pain, chronic epigastric pain or chronic pain syndrome
  • patients with past history of pneumothorax or any pulmonary surgical history
  • patients with any shoulder surgery histories
  • patients who required to conversion to open surgery from laparoscopic surgery
  • patients who required to receive incidental upper abdominal surgeries due to adhesion and injury at upper abdominal cavity
  • patients with inability to understand or express 10 point visual analogue scale
  • pregnant women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Control
Passive deflation of residual carbon dioxide
In the control group, residual carbon dioxide gas was evacuated by the routine method using passive exsufflation through the port site at the end of surgery.
Experimental: Normal Saline Instillation
Instillation of isotonic normal saline in the sub-diaphragmatic region
In the normal saline instillation group, in addition to the routine method, the patients were placed in the Trendelenburg position (30°), isotonic normal saline (20 ml/kg of body weight) was infused in the sub-diaphragmatic region at the end of surgery.
Experimental: Combined Intervention
Normal Saline Instillation + Pulmonary Recruitment
In the combined intervention group, in addition to the routine method, the patients were placed in the Trendelenburg position (30°), and a pulmonary recruitment maneuver was performed after instillation of isotonic normal saline (20 ml/kg of body weight) in the sub-diaphragmatic region at the end of surgery.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Shoulder pain evaluated by 10 point visual analogue scale
Time Frame: after two day of procedure
The pain score was evaluated by 10 point visual analogue scale.
after two day of procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Wound pain evaluated by 10 point visual analogue scale
Time Frame: after two day of procedure
The pain score was evaluated by 10 point visual analogue scale.
after two day of procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 26, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 19, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

July 30, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 21, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 22, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

June 23, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 11, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 7, 2018

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2016-05-048

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gynecologic Diseases

Clinical Trials on Passive Deflation

3
Subscribe