- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02811549
Benefits of the HiResolution Bionic Ear System in Adults With Asymmetric Hearing Loss
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Florida
-
Sarasota, Florida, United States, 34239
- The Silverstein Institute
-
-
Washington
-
Seattle, Washington, United States, 98101
- Virginia Mason Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
General Requirements:
- Ability to provide Informed Consent
- 18 years of age or older
- English language proficiency
- Willingness to participate in all scheduled procedures outlined in the study investigational plan
- Willingness to use an approved cochlear implant signal processing strategy in an everyday listening program during study
Ear to be Implanted:
- Severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss (> 70 dB HL) as defined by the pure tone average for 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz
- CNC word recognition score ≤30% (tested in subject's everyday listening condition for that ear)
- Duration of severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss (≥ 70 dB HL) >3 months and ≤10 years in the ear to be implanted only
Contralateral (non-implanted) ear:
- Up to a moderate sensorineural hearing loss (<70 dB HL) as defined by the pure tone average for 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz
- CNC word recognition score >30% (tested in subject's everyday listening condition for that ear)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous experience with a cochlear implant
- Cochlear malformation or obstruction (i.e. ossification) that would preclude full insertion of electrode array in the ear to be implanted
- Medical or psychological conditions that contraindicate surgery or impact the ability to manage an implanted device or the study related procedures as determined by the investigator
- Diagnosis of auditory neuropathy/dys-synchrony in either the ear to be implanted or the contralateral ear
- Active middle-ear disease/infection in the ear to be implanted
- Unrealistic expectations regarding potential benefits, risks and limitations inherent to implant surgical procedures as determined by the investigator
- Unwillingness or inability of subject to comply with all investigational requirements as determined by the investigator
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: HiResolution Bionic Cochlear Implant
HiRes 90K™ Advantage implant with HiFocus™ 1J electrode, HiRes 90K™ Advantage implant with the HiFocus Helix™ electrode, HiRes 90K™ Advantage implant with the HiFocus™ Mid-Scala electrode or the HiRes™ Ultra Implant with the HiFocus™ Mid-Scala electrode will be implanted in adults who have severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss in one ear, and up to moderate sensorineural hearing loss in the other ear (asymmetric hearing loss).
|
HiRes 90K™ Advantage implant with HiFocus™ 1J electrode, HiRes 90K™ Advantage implant with the HiFocus Helix™ electrode, HiRes 90K™ Advantage implant with the HiFocus™ Mid-Scala electrode or the HiRes™ Ultra Implant with the HiFocus™ Mid-Scala electrode will be implanted in adults with eligible hearing profile.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in Consonant Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) Word Recognition Test (Implanted Ear Only)
Time Frame: Baseline and Twelve months
|
The post-implant CNC word scores were compared to preimplant word scores.
The CNC monosyllabic word test is a validated test of open-set word recognition ability.
The test was administered in quiet at 60 target 0° azimuth) and scored as total number of words correct which is expressed for results/reporting as percentage correct.
The CNC word test was the primary speech perception metric used for study inclusion determination and postoperative outcome comparison at defined intervals for this feasibility study.
A higher percentage of recognized words represents better hearing of spoken words.
The intent is to understand the benefit of the implant treatment option and restoration of auditory input results in improved speech understanding.
|
Baseline and Twelve months
|
Change in Unaided Hearing Thresholds (Contralateral, Non-Implanted Ear, Only)
Time Frame: Baseline and Twelve months
|
Unaided audiometric thresholds compared to preimplant. Standard audiometric procedures were used for the testing of inter-octave frequencies as necessary. • Unaided air conduction thresholds using insert earphones at octave frequencies were measured for the contralateral, non-implanted ear at 250, 500, 1000, 2000, 4000 and 8000 Hz. Clinical masking was completed as appropriate. |
Baseline and Twelve months
|
Change in Speech Perception (Bilateral Listening Condition) - Speech Front, Noise Front
Time Frame: Baseline and Twelve months
|
AzBio speech scores in speech front, noise front twelve months post implantation compared to preimplant bilateral sentence scores.
The AzBio speech testing was the primary speech perception metric used for baseline and postoperative outcome comparison at defined intervals for this feasibility study.
A higher percentage of recognized words represents better hearing of spoken words.
|
Baseline and Twelve months
|
Change in Lateralization Ability Testing (Bilateral Listening Condition)
Time Frame: Baseline and Twelve months
|
Lateralization is ability to recognize the location of sound origin compared to preimplantation.
The subject was asked to identify if the sentence was heard from the right or left loudspeaker.
Scoring was based on the number of sentence locations correctly identified and expressed as a percent average.
A higher percent average indicates a better ability to identify sound location.
|
Baseline and Twelve months
|
Change in Speech Perception (Bilateral Listening Condition) - Speech Front/Noise to Implanted Ear
Time Frame: Baseline to Twelve Months
|
AzBio word scores in speech front, noise to implanted ear twelve months post implantation compared to preimplant bilateral sentence scores.
The AzBio speech testing was a speech perception metric used for baseline and postoperative outcome comparison at defined intervals for this feasibility study.
A higher percentage of recognized words represents better hearing of spoken words.
|
Baseline to Twelve Months
|
Bilateral Listening Condition (Both Ears - Everyday Listening Condition for Each Ear) - Speech Front /Noise to Non-Implanted Ear.
Time Frame: Baseline to Twelve Months
|
AzBio speech scores in speech front, noise to the contralateral ear at 12 months post implantation compared to preimplant bilateral sentence scores.
The baseline speech perception testing was a speech perception metric used for baseline and postoperative outcome comparison at defined intervals for this feasibility study.
A higher percentage of recognized words represents better hearing of spoken words.
|
Baseline to Twelve Months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CR0314
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases
-
University of ÉvoraInstituto Portugues Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco GentilCompletedOtorhinolaryngologic Neoplasms | Rehabilitation | Neck CancerPortugal
-
Stanford UniversityCompletedLaser Therapy | Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical ProceduresUnited States
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de BesanconCompletedOtorhinolaryngologic Diseases
-
University of AlbertaWithdrawn
-
Northwell HealthTerminatedOropharyngeal NeoplasmsUnited States
-
Washington University School of MedicineThe Foundation for Barnes-Jewish HospitalTerminatedOropharyngeal NeoplasmsUnited States
-
National Health Service, United KingdomCompletedENT DiseaseUnited Kingdom
-
Assiut UniversityUnknown
-
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC)CompletedPolymyositis | Pharyngeal Neoplasm | Speech Disorder | Otorhinolaryngologic Disease | Otorhinolaryngologic NeoplasmUnited States
Clinical Trials on HiResolution Bionic Cochlear Implant
-
University of California, San FranciscoWithdrawnDeafnessUnited States
-
Advanced BionicsUnknown
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillMed-El CorporationCompletedMeniere's Disease | Unilateral Acoustic NeuromaUnited States
-
Nantes University HospitalRecruitingProfound Bilateral Hearing LossFrance
-
CochlearCompletedSingle Sided DeafnessUnited States
-
Western University, CanadaLawson Health Research Institute; Academic Medical Organization of Southwestern... and other collaboratorsRecruiting
-
CochlearCompleted
-
MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte GesmbHRecruitingSensorineural Hearing Loss, BilateralFrance
-
Med-El CorporationTerminatedHearing LossUnited States, Canada
-
University of NottinghamNottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustNot yet recruiting