Rehabilitation Improved by Early Detection of Fisyulas Post (Pharyngo) -Total Laryngectomy by Cytokine Measurement on Drainage Fluid on the Second Post-Operative Day (RADEFILAC)

September 19, 2025 updated by: University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Post-pharyngo-laryngectomy fistula is a frequent surgical complication, resulting in delayed patient management and reduced quality of life. A recent study has shown that the appearance of a fistula can be detected early by measuring cytokines (particularly IL10) in postoperative drainage fluids. Resumption of feeding following this surgery varies between postoperative day 5 and postoperative day 15, depending on the team's habits. Early refeeding reduces the length of hospital stay and improves patients' quality of life. The decision to refeed is currently made without any clinical or biological marker of the quality of pharyngeal suture healing. The idea of this study is that good initial healing (evidenced by low levels of inflammatory cytokine in drainage fluids) allows early refeeding without putting the patient at additional risk.

Main hypothesis and research objectives Main hypothesis: the determination of cytokines in postoperative drainage fluids (FODP) could be a tool for screening patients at no risk of developing a fistula, and for whom early refeeding (as early as postoperative day 3) could be proposed without exposing the patient to an additional risk of developing a FODP.

Study objectives Primary objective: to compare the rate of post-(pharyngo)-total laryngectomy fistula between an early refeeding strategy (3rd or 4th postoperative day) and a late refeeding strategy (current standard of care: 7th postoperative day) in a low-risk fistula group defined according to the level of inflammatory cytokines in drainage fluids on the second postoperative day.

Secondary objectives

To compare an early versus a late refeeding strategy for patients at low risk of fistula defined according to the level of inflammatory cytokines in drainage fluids on the second postoperative day for:

  • length of hospital stay,
  • evolution of nutritional status,
  • time to postoperative radio-chemotherapy, if indicated postoperatively,
  • improvement in quality of life,
  • post-operative complications other than pharyngeal fistula. Evaluation of different strategies left to the investigator's choice (continuation of antibiotic therapy, increased delay before resumption of feeding, early resumption of surgery) in the group of patients at high risk of fistula, based on the determination of postoperative cytokines in drainage fluids.

Primary endpoint: Pharyngo-cutaneous fistula occurring within 30 days post-operatively (yes/no).

Number of subjects: 250 Inclusion criteria Major cancer patient justifying scheduled total laryngectomy or pharyngo-laryngectomy after multidisciplinary consultation.

Holder of a social security plan. Non-inclusion criteria Pregnant and breast-feeding women Persons under curatorship, guardianship, safeguard of justice or deprived of liberty.

Any medical condition deemed incompatible with the study by the investigator. Refusal to participate. Body mass index less than 18.5 kg/m2

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Course of the study Patients will be recruited from the ENT departments of the Clermont Ferrand, Saint-Etienne, Lyon and Grenoble university hospitals, the Lyon (Centre Léon Bérard) and Paris (Institut Gustave Roussy) cancer centers, and the Le Puy En Velay and Valence hospitals, all of which are accredited for cervico-facial carcinology.

A multidisciplinary consultation meeting will be required to validate the surgical procedure.

Patients will be informed of the study by the investigating physician. After a period of reflection and a chance to answer any questions, the patient will be included in the study after consent has been obtained from an investigator.

The main risk factors for the development of a fistula will be recorded pre- and intraoperatively.

Surgical criteria will be common to all investigating teams. The most important of these will be the positioning of the LDPO collection drain opposite the pharyngeal closure site. The drain may or may not be aspirative, depending on local habits. The concomitant insertion of a phonatory prosthesis or a salivary bypass are not grounds for exclusion.

Post-operative care must meet precise specifications. Drainage fluids will be collected from the drainage bottle on D2 post-op. To do this, the entire drainage bottle will be recovered, and a new bottle will be placed over the drain if the drain is retained.

The liquid contained in the drainage bottle is then sterile-separated into different samples directly in the patient's hospital ward:

  • Immunological sampling. A BD Falcon™ Conical Tubes 50 mL will be sent to the immunology laboratory associated with the investigating center (Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital Immunology Laboratory for the Clermont-Fd and Le Puy en Velay sites, Lyon University Hospital Immunology Laboratory for the Grenoble, Lyon, Valence and Lyon anti-cancer center, the immunology laboratory of the Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris for the Gustave Roussy Institute and the immunology laboratory for the Saint-Etienne center). The sample is then centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 10 minutes at 4°C.a "high-risk" group for CPE.
  • Bacteriological sampling. This sample will be sent rapidly to the bacteriology laboratory of the investigating center for standard cyto-bacteriological analysis.

For an IL 10 level on D2 post-op of less than 72pg/mL (so-called low-risk fistula group defined from the DEFILAC pilot study), two groups of patients will be constituted:

Low-risk fistula group: OPT performed on D3 or D4 (before randomization and after IL-10 results). If TPO classified according to van la Parra ≤1, patients will be randomized into 2 groups:

  • "EARLY" group: Resumption of feeding on postoperative day 3 or 4 with a liquid or mixed diet.
  • "TARDIF" group: return to a mixed diet from day 7 post-op. Randomization will be centralized, computerized with random block sizes, stratified by center and patient age.

If the TOP shows images classified according to van la Parra>1, patients will join the so-called high-risk CPE exploratory arm.

If IL10 levels on D2 post-op exceed 72 pg/mL (high-risk group for post-op fistula), these patients will form a third, exploratory group, whose management will be left to the investigator's choice, with 3 possibilities (no change in investigators' habits): repeat surgery to clean the surgical site and repair the pharyngeal sutures, broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy while awaiting the bacteriological results of the cytobacteriological examination of the drainage fluid on postoperative day 2, without repeat surgery, monitoring and no change in the investigator's routine.

Postoperative complications will then be noted and classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification over a period of 30 postoperative days.

The appearance of a salivary fistula at the tracheostoma will be objectified by the appearance of saliva in the tracheostoma. The appearance of a fistula at the cervical level will be sought either by imaging methods in the event of a cervical complication (infection, hemorrhage) if no surgical revision is decided and surgically by loss of sealing confirmed surgically if a revision is necessary.

The appearance of a subsequent fistula will be noted. The patient will have a final consultation 30 days after surgery if he or she is no longer hospitalized.

The quality of life of the patients will be assessed throughout the study by completing an anxiety questionnaire and a depression questionnaire. This assessment will be done before surgery, on D5, D15 and D30 of surgery. Before surgery and at D5, these questionnaires will be completed during hospitalization. At D15 and D30, the questionnaires will be completed during hospitalization if the patient is still hospitalized or by mail if the patient has been discharged from the surgical department having performed the pharyngolaryngectomy procedure. The date of the start of chemoradiotherapy will then be noted and the time between surgery and the start of this treatment will be noted.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

250

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Clermont-Ferrand, France
        • Recruiting
        • CHU de Clermont-Ferrand
        • Contact:
          • Lise LACLAUTRE
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Nicolas Saroul
      • Grenoble, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • CHU de Grenoble
        • Contact:
          • Lise LACLAUTRE
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Fabre Christol
      • Le Puy-en-Velay, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • CH Emile Roux
        • Contact:
          • Lise LACLAUTRE
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Marc Durand
      • Lyon, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • HCL Hôpital Croix Rousse
        • Contact:
          • Lise LACLAUTRE
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Philippe CERUSE
      • Saint-Etienne, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • CHU de Saint-Etienne
        • Contact:
          • Lise LACLAUTRE
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Yann Lelonge
      • Valence, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • CH de Valence
        • Contact:
          • Lise LACLAUTRE
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Guillaume Buiret
      • Villejuif, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Institut Gustave Roussy
        • Contact:
          • Lise LACLAUTRE
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ingrid Breuskin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patient with cancer requiring a total laryngectomy or pharyngolaryngectomy scheduled after multidisciplinary consultation.
  • Holder of a social security scheme

Exclusion Criteria:

Pregnant and breastfeeding women Persons under curatorship, guardianship, legal protection or deprived of liberty Any medical condition deemed by the investigator to be incompatible with the study. Refusal to participate. Body mass index less than 18.5 kg/ m2

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Early group
For an IL 10 level on postoperative day 2 below 72 pg/mL (group said to be at low risk of developing a fistula defined from the DEFILAC pilot study), resumption of food on the 3rd or 4th postoperative day with a mixed diet.
Resumption of food on the 3rd or 4th day post-operatively with a mixed diet.
Placebo Comparator: late group
For an IL 10 level on postoperative day 2 below 72 pg/mL (group said to be at low risk of developing a fistula defined from the DEFILAC pilot study), resumption of food on the 3rd or 4th postoperative day with a mixed diet.
Resumption of food on the 7th day post-operatively with a mixed diet.
No Intervention: No intervention
For an IL 10 level on postoperative day 2 greater than 72 pg/mL (group at high risk of postoperative fistula), these patients will constitute a third, exploratory group, whose management will be left to the investigator's discretion.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pharyngocutaneous fistula occurring within 30 days postoperatively
Time Frame: Day 30
Apparition or not of Pharyngocutaneous fistula occurring within 30 days postoperatively (yes/no).
Day 30

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hospitalization time in days.
Time Frame: Day 30
Duration of Hospitalization time in days.
Day 30
Evolution of Weight in kg
Time Frame: Day 30
Evolution of nutritional status between the start and the end of hospitalization assessed by the evolution of weight, strength of the forearm (Hand grip strength test)
Day 30
Nutrition Risk INdex
Time Frame: Day 30
Evolution of nutritional status between the start and the end of hospitalization assessed by the evolution of the Nutrition Risk Index (NRI),
Day 30
Measure of grip strenght
Time Frame: Day 30
Evolution of nutritional status between the start and the end of hospitalization assessed by the evolution of the grip strength of the forearm (Hand grip strength test)
Day 30
Deadlines for the implementation of post-operative radio-chemotherapy
Time Frame: Day 30
Deadlines for the implementation of post-operative radio-chemotherapy
Day 30
Clavien-Dindo Classification
Time Frame: Day 30
Surgical complications within 30 days post-operatively by the Clavien-Dindo classification
Day 30
Beck Depression Inventory II questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 0
Quality of life, measure of level of depression by Beck Depression Inventory II questionnaire
Day 0
Beck Depression Inventory II questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 5
Quality of life, measure of level of depression by Beck Depression Inventory II questionnaire
Day 5
Beck Depression Inventory II questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 15
Quality of life, measure of level of depression by Beck Depression Inventory II questionnaire
Day 15
Beck Depression Inventory II questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 30
Quality of life, measure of level of depression by Beck Depression Inventory II questionnaire
Day 30
Beck Anxiety Inventory
Time Frame: Day 0
Quality of life, measure of level of anxiety by BBeck Anxiety Inventory questionnaire
Day 0
Beck Anxiety Inventory
Time Frame: Day 5
Quality of life, measure of level of anxiety by BBeck Anxiety Inventory questionnaire
Day 5
Beck Anxiety Inventory
Time Frame: Day 15
Quality of life, measure of level of anxiety by BBeck Anxiety Inventory questionnaire
Day 15
Beck Anxiety Inventory
Time Frame: Day 30
Quality of life, measure of level of anxiety by BBeck Anxiety Inventory questionnaire
Day 30
EORTC-QLQ30 questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 0
Measure of quality of life by EORTC-QLQ30 questionnaire
Day 0
EORTC-QLQ30 questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 5
Measure of quality of life by EORTC-QLQ30 questionnaire
Day 5
EORTC-QLQ30 questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 15
Measure of quality of life by EORTC-QLQ30 questionnaire
Day 15
EORTC-QLQ30 questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 30
Measure of quality of life by EORTC-QLQ30 questionnaire
Day 30
Tumor status
Time Frame: Day 30
Tumor status by TNM classification 8th edition
Day 30
Cytobacteriological examination of the drainage fluid.
Time Frame: Day 2
Cytobacteriological examination of the drainage fluid.
Day 2
continuation of antibiotic therapy
Time Frame: Day 30
continuation of antibiotic therapy (in days)
Day 30
Resuming food
Time Frame: Day 30
increase in time before resuming food
Day 30
Surgical resumption
Time Frame: Day 30
early surgical resumption and type of procedure performed in the group of patients with no intervention
Day 30

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nicolas Saroul, University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 12, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 17, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 17, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

September 19, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 22, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 19, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PHRCI 2022 SAROUL
  • 2024-A00652-45 (Other Identifier: 2024-A00652-45)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer, Otorhinolaryngeal

Clinical Trials on early feeding resumption

Subscribe