Intranasal Ketamine for Acute Traumatic Pain

June 29, 2016 updated by: Prof. Pinchas (Pinny) Halpern MD, Tel Aviv Medical Center

Intranasal Ketamine for Acute Traumatic Pain in the Emergency Department: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial of Efficacy and Safety

Introduction: Ketamine has been well studied for its efficacy as an analgesic agent. However, intranasal (IN) administration of ketamine has only recently been studied in the emergency setting.

Objective: To elucidate the efficacy and adverse effects of a sub-dissociative dose of IN Ketamine compared to IV and IM morphine.

Methods: A single-center, randomized, prospective, parallel clinical trial of efficacy and safety of IN ketamine compared to IV and IM morphine for analgesia in the emergency department (ED). A convenience sample of 90 patients aged 18-70 experiencing moderate-severe acute traumatic pain (≥80mm on 100mm Visual Analog Scale [VAS]) were randomized to receive either 1.0mg/kg IN ketamine, 0.1mg/kg IV MO or 0.15mg/kg IM MO. Pain relief and adverse effects were recorded for 1 hour post-administration.

Primary Outcomes: The primary outcome was efficacy of IN ketamine compared to IV and IM MO, measured by "time-to-onset" (defined as a ≥15mm pain decrease on VAS), as well as time to and degree of maximal pain reduction.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tel Aviv, Israel
        • Tel Aviv Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients aged 18-70 years, with mild to moderate blunt trauma (sustained in road, workplace and home accidents) causing moderate to severe pain (≥ 80mm score on a 100mm Visual Analog Scale=VAS) were eligible for participation in the study. Inclusion criteria also included a Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) of 15, body weight of 50-110 kg, systolic blood pressure of 90-160 mmHg, heart rate <100 bpm. Patients were also required to have an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of 1 or 2, deny head injury, and deny regular use or use of opiates.

Exclusion Criteria:

Any analgesia received within the prior 3 hours, allergic sensitivity to morphine or ketamine, a large meal ingested within the previous hour, pregnancy, deviated nasal septum or trauma to the nose, and a history of a psychiatric condition. Despite evidence that ketamine does not exacerbate intracranial hemorrhage in patients with head trauma, patients with head injury complaining of loss of consciousness, dizziness, vomiting, or nausea were excluded as well.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: IN Ketamine
A single administration of 1 mg/kg ketamine hydrochloride delivered in an intranasal route using an atomizer
Delivered intranasally using an atomizer
Active Comparator: IM Morphine
A single administration of 0.15 mg/kg intramuscular morphine
Delivered either as an IM injection or a slow IV bolus
Active Comparator: IV Morphine
A single administration of 0.1 mg/kg slow intravascular bolus of morphine.
Delivered either as an IM injection or a slow IV bolus

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effectiveness of intranasal ketamine in decreasing pain intensity [patient assessed - VAS pain score]
Time Frame: 1 hour post administration
Time to achieve a clinically meaningful pain reduction was defined as the first time-point at which the patient reported 15mm of pain reduction or more. Maximal pain reduction was defined as the lowest VAS score reported by the patient over the course of follow-up. Time to maximal pain reduction was defined as the time at which the patient has the lowest VAS score over the course of the hour follow-up.
1 hour post administration

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
adverse effects [Opiate Related Symptom Distress Scale]
Time Frame: 1 hour post administration
Adverse effects were recorded at the end of one hour using the 'Opiate Related Symptom Distress Scale' and included measurements of the presence, frequency, intensity and disruptiveness of 12 common opiate side-effects. Among these were nausea, vomiting, urinary retention, constipation, difficulty concentrating, dizziness, confusion, and others.
1 hour post administration
patient satisfaction [Interview]
Time Frame: 1 hour post administration
patients were asked to provide subjective comments
1 hour post administration

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pinchas Halpern, MD, Tel Aviv Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 27, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 27, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

June 29, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 30, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 29, 2016

Last Verified

June 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Pain

Clinical Trials on Ketamine Hydrochloride

Subscribe