- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02825290
Modified Luteal Support for Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer - A Prospective Study
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Background With the recent trend toward single embryo transfer (ET) adopted in an attempt to reduce the risk of multiple pregnancy, the remaining extra embryos are cryopreserved, providing further possibilities for conception after the initial fresh transfer. Moreover, several studies that compared fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles in normal responders have demonstrated a significantly higher clinical pregnancy rate per transfer in the FET versus the fresh cycles.
There are several currently employed replacement protocols for FET. The choice of protocol depends on the individual woman's ovarian function and convenience of the method, as well as on the experience gained with the method by the physicians. Whatever protocol is used, the success requires optimal synchronization between the embryonic stage at thawing and date of the endometrium within the endometrial preparation cycle. While there is a consensus regarding the duration, route of delivery and dosage of estrogen supplementation, and the optimal ultrasonographic endometrial appearance and thickness, the effect of the different modes of luteal support remains unclear.
Prompted by the study demonstrating higher ongoing pregnancy rate following the transfer of frozen-thawed embryos in natural cycles with spontaneous LH rise compared with natural cycles controlled by hCG for final oocyte maturation and the reports showing improved pregnancy rate in patients who received a mid-luteal injection of a GnRH-agonist (0.1 mg triptorelin), the investigators started beginning at June 2014 to offer ovulatory patients with regular menstrual cycles a natural FET with modified luteal support. Starting on the day of spontaneous ovulation, patients received daily vaginal progesterone, supplemented by a single injection of HCG and GnRH-agonist, on day of ET and 4 days later, respectively.
The results for this study were very promising - the investigators were able to show a significant increase in implantation rate (30% vs. 17%; p<0.03), clinical pregnancy (48% vs. 26%; p<0.01) and ongoing pregnancy (39% vs. 20%; p<0.01) for the patients receiving the aforementioned modified luteal support protocol.
After the completion of this retrospective study the investigators are heading to prove the superiority of the modified luteal support protocol for ovulatory patients by conducting a prospective study.
Materials & Methods Study design - A prospective, randomized, blinded study. Primary endpoint - Ongoing pregnancy. Secondary endpoints - Implantation rate, clinical pregnancy. Study sample - According to the previous, retrospective study the investigators will need 31 patients in each study arm in order to show an increase from 20% clinical pregnancy to 39% (confidence level 5%, beta error level 50%).
The patients - The investigators will offer each patient treated in the unit for frozen-thawed embryo transfer to participate in the study. The randomization of the participants will be on the day of embryo transfer with a computer program on a 1:1 enrollment ratio.
All transfers will be performed by an experienced physician who will be blinded to the luteal support protocol.
Both groups will be treated with the accepted progesterone luteal support - starting on ovulation day - vaginal progesterone 90 mg (Crinone; Merck Serono, Hellerup, Denmark) once a day.
Study group - Patients in the study group will receive additional two injections - the first - recombinant hCG 250 mcg (Ovitrelle; Merck Serono) on the transfer day and the second - GnRH-agonist 0.1 mg (Decapeptyl; Ferring Pharmaceuticals Israel) 4 days after the embryo transfer day. Patients in the control group will receive no injection.
B-hCG levels will be examined 12 days after embryo transfer and if positive ultrasound examinations will be performed as usual to document pregnancy outcome.
The data - The investigators will use demographic data such as age, BMI, gynecological data as gravida, para, etiology of infertility and data about previous & current IVF treatments such as number of treatments, stimulation protocol, hormone levels, number of oocytes, embryos' characteristics, etc.
Statistics - Statistical analysis will be performed with Student's t-test and Chi square, as appropriate. Results will be presented as means ± standard deviations; p<0.05 will be considered significant.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Ramat Gan, Israel
- Recruiting
- Sheba Medical Center
-
Contact:
- Eran Zilberberg, MD
- Phone Number: +97235302882
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 20-40 years old women
- Spontaneously ovulating women
- Treated in our IVF unit for frozen-thawed embryo transfer
- At least one top quality embryo
Exclusion Criteria:
- PGD patients
- More than 4 previous embryo transfers
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Study group
hCG (Choriogonadotropin alfa; Ovitrelle 250 mcg) on day of embryo transfer & GnRH-agonist (Triptorelin acetate; Decapeptyl 0.1 mg) after 4 days In addition to the usual progesterone luteal support.
|
Other Names:
Other Names:
|
|
No Intervention: Control group
The usual progesterone only luteal phase support.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Ongoing pregnancy
Time Frame: About 10-12 weeks after embryo transfer
|
Number of viable pregnancies at about 10-12 weeks of gestation.
|
About 10-12 weeks after embryo transfer
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Implantation rate
Time Frame: 2 weeks after embryo transfer
|
Positive BhCG blood test
|
2 weeks after embryo transfer
|
|
Clinical pregnancy
Time Frame: About 3-4 weeks after embryo transfer
|
Visible intrauterine gestational sacs on ultrasound exam
|
About 3-4 weeks after embryo transfer
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Fatemi HM, Kyrou D, Bourgain C, Van den Abbeel E, Griesinger G, Devroey P. Cryopreserved-thawed human embryo transfer: spontaneous natural cycle is superior to human chorionic gonadotropin-induced natural cycle. Fertil Steril. 2010 Nov;94(6):2054-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.11.036. Epub 2010 Jan 25.
- Tesarik J, Hazout A, Mendoza-Tesarik R, Mendoza N, Mendoza C. Beneficial effect of luteal-phase GnRH agonist administration on embryo implantation after ICSI in both GnRH agonist- and antagonist-treated ovarian stimulation cycles. Hum Reprod. 2006 Oct;21(10):2572-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del173. Epub 2006 Aug 22.
- Pritts EA, Atwood AK. Luteal phase support in infertility treatment: a meta-analysis of the randomized trials. Hum Reprod. 2002 Sep;17(9):2287-99. doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.9.2287.
- Tesarik J, Hazout A, Mendoza C. Enhancement of embryo developmental potential by a single administration of GnRH agonist at the time of implantation. Hum Reprod. 2004 May;19(5):1176-80. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh235. Epub 2004 Apr 7.
- Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC, Aguirre M, Hudson C, Thomas S. Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer in normal responders. Fertil Steril. 2011 Aug;96(2):344-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.050. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
- Thurin A, Hausken J, Hillensjo T, Jablonowska B, Pinborg A, Strandell A, Bergh C. Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 2004 Dec 2;351(23):2392-402. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041032.
- Le Lannou D, Griveau JF, Laurent MC, Gueho A, Veron E, Morcel K. Contribution of embryo cryopreservation to elective single embryo transfer in IVF-ICSI. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006 Sep;13(3):368-75. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61441-1.
- Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC, Aguirre M, Hudson C. Clinical rationale for cryopreservation of entire embryo cohorts in lieu of fresh transfer. Fertil Steril. 2014 Jul;102(1):3-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.04.018. Epub 2014 May 17.
- Orvieto R, Fisch B, Feldberg D. Endometrial Preparation for Patients undergoing Frozen- Thawed Embryo Transfer Cycles. In: The Art & Science of Assisted Reproductive Techniques. G. Allahbadia, R. asuray, R. Merchant, Eds. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. New Delhi, India, 2003, pp. 396-9.
- Navot D, Laufer N, Kopolovic J, Rabinowitz R, Birkenfeld A, Lewin A, Granat M, Margalioth EJ, Schenker JG. Artificially induced endometrial cycles and establishment of pregnancies in the absence of ovaries. N Engl J Med. 1986 Mar 27;314(13):806-11. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198603273141302.
- Meldrum DR. Female reproductive aging--ovarian and uterine factors. Fertil Steril. 1993 Jan;59(1):1-5. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55608-8.
- Orvieto R, Brengauz M, Feldman B. A novel approach to normal responder patient with repeated implantation failures--a case report. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2015 Jun;31(6):435-7. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2015.1005595. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
- Haas J, Lantsberg D, Feldman N, Manela D, Machtinger R, Dar S, Rabinovici J, Orvieto R. Modifying the luteal phase support in natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer improves cycle outcome. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2015;31(11):891-3. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2015.1075502. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2537-15-SMC
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Embryo Transfer
-
Premium FertilityRecruiting
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompleted
-
Rafael Bernabeu PérezUnknown
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedEmbryo TransferUnited States
-
Istituto Clinico HumanitasCompletedEmbryo Transfer
-
keqin liuCompletedEmbryo TransferChina
-
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenJessa Hospital; Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden; GZA Ziekenhuizen Campus Sint-AugustinusCompleted
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompleted
-
Gynuity Health ProjectsCompleted
-
University Hospital, MontpellierWithdrawnFrozen Embryo TransferFrance
Clinical Trials on Choriogonadotropin alfa
-
University of Sao Paulo General HospitalUnknown
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentNot yet recruiting
-
Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, GermanyCompleted
-
EMD SeronoTerminatedHypogonadotropic HypogonadismUnited States
-
EMD SeronoCompletedInfertility | Ovulation Induction
-
EMD SeronoCompletedInfertile Women Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART)
-
Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria La FeCompleted
-
Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, GermanyCompleted
-
University of California, San DiegoCompletedOvarian Morphology and Theca Cell Androgen Production in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS)Polycystic Ovary SyndromeUnited States