Operative Treatment Of Metatarsalgia: Triple Weil Osteotomy Or Distal Metatarsal Minimal Invasive Osteotomy (DMMO)? (WeilvsDMMO)

March 18, 2018 updated by: Manuel Cuervas-Mons

Open Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial To Assess Functional Outcomes Between Two Therapeutic Options In The Surgical Treatment Of Metatarsalgia: Triple Weil Osteotomy (Two) And Distal Metatarsal Osteotomy Minimally Invasive (DMMO)

INTRODUCTION

Metatarsalgia is a vague term defining a symptom instead of a specific condition. The aim of surgical treatment of metatarsalgia is to decrease the pressure under metatarsal head, shortening and / or raising the metatarsal. It has been somewhat controversial, with more than 25 different lesser metatarsal osteotomies described to date.

The Triple´s Weil osteotomy described by Maceira is the most widely used surgical treatment in open distal metatarsal surgery but nowadays, percutaneous osteotomy has proven to be a valid technique that yields results similar to open osteotomy for the treatment of metatarsalgia and other forefoot problems. It has been somewhat controversial the choice between the different operative treatments, being nowadays the triple´s Weil osteotomy (TWO) and the distal minimally invasive osteotomy (DMMO) the most popular, gaining both defenders and retractors surgeons in open and percutaneous surgery.

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical results between two different surgical treatments: triple´s Weil osteotomy (TWO) and distal minimal invasive osteotomy (DMMO).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The investigators design an open randomized controlled clinical trial with patients operated in the same centre.

The patients are randomized to TWO and DMMO groups. Number of osteotomies is based on the criteria of Leventen formula. In all patients the metatarsal osteotomy can be combined with different surgical procedures in presence of associated deformities: (i) SCARF osteotomy for hallux valgus (HV) deformity, (ii) flexor and extensor tenotomies with distal phalangeal percutaneous osteotomy for lesser toes deformities.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

INTRODUCTION

Metatarsalgia is a vague term defining a symptom instead of a specific condition. The aim of surgical treatment of metatarsalgia is to decrease the pressure under metatarsal head, shortening and / or raising the metatarsal, thus removing the overload and preserving the joint integrity. It has been somewhat controversial, with more than 25 different lesser metatarsal osteotomies described to date. The Weil osteotomy is the most widely used surgical treatment in open distal metatarsal surgery, a popularity based upon the simple technique, stable fixation, excellent union rates and predictable results.

According to the principles of traditional surgery, surgical manoeuvres requiring large incisions and aggressive techniques should be needed to effectively resolve the different pathological elements producing the deformity in order to eliminate this serious injury. These principles concerns surgeons like White, who described a modification of the distal metaphyseal osteotomy through a percutaneous approach without visualization and without internal fixation to obtain a metatarsal in optimal weight-bearing position. Percutaneous surgery of the foot, also known as minimal invasive surgery (MIS), allows interventions to be carried out through extremely small incisions without direct exposure of the surgical field under radiologic monitoring, thus causing minimal injury to adjacent tissues, and reducing the surgical trauma. Over the last few years, Foot Surgery has come to be recognised as a major Orthopaedic subspecialty, where the percutaneous surgery plays an important role. The Triple´s Weil osteotomy described by Maceira is the most widely used surgical treatment in open distal metatarsal surgery but nowadays, percutaneous osteotomy has proven to be a valid technique that yields results similar to open osteotomy for the treatment of metatarsalgia and other forefoot problems. It has been somewhat controversial the choice between the different operative treatments, being nowadays the triple´s Weil osteotomy (TWO) and the distal minimally invasive osteotomy (DMMO) the most popular, gaining both defenders and retractors surgeons in open and percutaneous surgery.

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical results between two different surgical treatments: triple´s Weil osteotomy (TWO) and distal minimal invasive osteotomy (DMMO).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The investigators design an open randomized controlled clinical trial with patients operated in the same centre.

The patients are randomized to TWO and DMMO groups. Number of osteotomies is based on the criteria of Leventen formula. In all patients the metatarsal osteotomy can be combined with different surgical procedures in presence of associated deformities: (i) SCARF osteotomy for hallux valgus (HV) deformity, (ii) flexor and extensor tenotomies with distal phalangeal percutaneous osteotomy for lesser toes deformities.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Madrid, Spain, 28007
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • all consecutive adult patients with the diagnosis of mechanical metatarsalgia served in the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology of the investigative hospital, without non-operative treatment response after 6 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • traumatic metatarsalgia
  • secondary metatarsalgia (diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, or general diseases)
  • equinus contracture
  • active infection
  • systematic disease (inflammatory, metabolic, neurologic or vascular) explaining symptoms, - metatarsophalangeal (MTPJ) dislocation higher than 5mm
  • inability to complete postoperative management
  • previous forefoot surgeries

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: TWO

Patients with metatarsalgia and without response to non-operative treatment after six months, needing surgical treatment for relief of their symptoms.

Triple´s Weil osteotomy is performed.

A 10mm longitudinal incision is made with a No.15 blade in the second intermetatarsal space immediately behind the dorsal interdigital fold, parallel to the extensor tendon. An intra-articular osteotomy in the metatarsal head is performed angled 45º relative to the long axis of the metatarsal and in a dorsal-distal to proximal-plantar direction. A second osteotomy is performed perpendicular to the metatarsal shaft,.The osteotomy is fastened with a 2.0mm snap-off screw.

Once all the osteotomies are completed, the incisions are closed with a 2/0 monofilament suture.

Other Names:
  • TWO
Active Comparator: DMMO

Patients with metatarsalgia and without response to non-operative treatment after six months, needing surgical treatment for relief of their symptoms.

Distal metatarsal minimally invasive osteotomy is performed.

A 5mm longitudinal incision is made with a MIS blade No.64 in the intermetatarsal space immediately behind the dorsal interdigital fold, parallel to the extensor tendon. Under fluoroscopy vision, an extra-articular osteotomy in the metatarsal neck is performed angled 45º relative to the long axis of the metatarsal and in a dorsal-distal to proximal-plantar direction. The osteotomies scheduled preoperatively are performed, repeating the same procedure for each ray needing an osteotomy. Once all are completed, the incisions are closed with a 4/0 monofilament suture.
Other Names:
  • DMMO

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score (AOFAS) at 3 and 12 months
Time Frame: Preoperative, 3 months follow-up and 12 months follow-up
Score for pain, function and alignment
Preoperative, 3 months follow-up and 12 months follow-up
Change from Baseline Short form Health survey 36 (SF-36) at 3 and 12 months
Time Frame: Preoperative, 3 months follow-up and 12 months follow-up
Score for quality of life
Preoperative, 3 months follow-up and 12 months follow-up
Change from Baseline Visual Analog Score (VAS) at 3 and 12 months
Time Frame: Preoperative, 3 months follow-up and 12 months follow-up
Score for pain
Preoperative, 3 months follow-up and 12 months follow-up
Benton-Weil´s questionnaire
Time Frame: 12 months follow-up

The questionnaire incorporate actual VAS and clinical results subjectively evaluated with three questions:

(i) Does the surgery meet your expectations? (ii) Would you recommend the procedure to a friend in similar conditions? (iii) Would you have undergone the procedure, knowing now your outcome?

12 months follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from 3 months MTPJ joint mobility at 12 months
Time Frame: 3 months follow-up and 12 months follow-up

Metatarso-phalangeal joint (MTPJ) mobility described as the range of motion (ROM) of the joint, measured by a goniometer MTPJ range of motion is measured in a open chain patient who is lying down with the knee extended and the foot at rest in spontaneous plantar flexion.

Full ROM of plantar flexion combined with dorsiflexion was classified in: normal ROM ≥70º, moderately stiff ROM 30º to 70º, and severely stiff ROM < 30º..

3 months follow-up and 12 months follow-up
Change from Baseline Metatarsal formula at 12 months
Time Frame: Preoperative and 12 months follow-up
Changes in the radiological metatarsal formula are measured with the average recoil of the metatarsal heads between the preoperative and the 12 months follow up measurement.
Preoperative and 12 months follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 5, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

July 26, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 20, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2018

Last Verified

March 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metatarsalgia

Clinical Trials on Triple Weil´s Osteotomy

Subscribe