Maximal Plantar Pressure and Comfort Evaluation of Orthopedic Stilettos

January 28, 2016 updated by: Jeannette Penny, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre

Maximal Plantar Pressure and Comfort Evaluation During Normal Every Day Use of an "Orthopedic" Stiletto, a Normal Stiletto and a Control Trainer Shoe

22 women Testing "orthopedic" stilettos compared to standard stilettos and a comfy trainer.

Testing involves pedobar pressures and a validated comfort questionnaire.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

22 women Testing "orthopedic" stilettos compared to standard stilettos and a comfy trainer testing involved pedobar pressures and a validated comfort questionnaire.

x rays with arthrosis 1. metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ), hallux valgus and Intermetatarsal (IM) angles will be recorded.

Clinically, weight, height, foot length, heel valgus, 1. MTPJ range of motion, pain, callus, hammertoes will be recorded.

Sole pressure in heel, arch and forefoot grids measured by in-sole pressure pedar-x (Novel) and possible Emed system (Novel).

3 working days in each type of shoe with Steps measured by pedometer Comfort assed as VAS according to: Mundermann,A., Nigg,B.M., Stefanyshyn,D.J., and Humble,R.N.: Development of a reliable method to asses footwear comfort during running. Gait Posture, 16:38-45, 2002.

Primary outcome is the foot sole pressures. Both VAS comfort and foot pressures will be regressed to see if age, BMI, shoe size, steps, shoe type, callus, index minus, hallux valgus etc has an effect.

16 needed for the pressure and 21 for the comfort score. 22 will be included to make sure the investigators have enough power.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

22

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hvidovre, Denmark, 2650
        • Hvidovre Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 67 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Foot healthy females used to wearing stilettos.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Shoe sized outside European 37-42.
  • Sought doctor for foot or balance related issues

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: orthopaedic stilettoe
orthopaedic stilettoe will be compared to standard stilettoe and comfy trainer
stilettos with orthopaedic in-sole buildt into the shoe
standard stiletto without insole
comfy trainer

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
plantar foot pressure
Time Frame: 1 hrs
Mean and peak pressure and pressure/time in the heel, arch and fore foot ( fore foot subdivided into 1. metatarsal head, 2+3 rd head, 4+5th head and the big toe). Pressure measured as Newton/sq. cm.
1 hrs

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
comfort rating footwear
Time Frame: 1 month
VAS scale indication comfort around the shoe. The scale is continuous from 0 to 15, with 15 being the most comfortable condition imaginable. It measures: Overall comfort, Heel cushioning, Forefoot cushioning, Arch height, Heel cup fit, Heel cup width, Shoe forefoot width, Shoe length. The investigators will register all but the overall comfort and the cushioning measures are assumed the most interesting measures in this study. (Mundermann,A., Nigg,B.M., Stefanyshyn,D.J., and Humble,R.N.: Development of a reliable method to assess footwear comfort during running. Gait Posture, 16:38-45, 2002.)
1 month

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
X ray angles of the foot
Time Frame: 1 hrs
Hallux valgus, Intermetatarsal and O'Meary angles, index minus (Rui Baracco 2011) and signs of arthrosis (Cockhlin 2003 grade 0-4)
1 hrs

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: jeannette penny, PhD, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 28, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

January 29, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 29, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2016

Last Verified

January 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metatarsalgia

Clinical Trials on orthopaedic stilettoe

3
Subscribe