Effects of Prefabricated Foot Orthoses With and Without Metatarsal Pads on Central Metatarsalgia

July 15, 2024 updated by: Chan Fung Ting, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Effects of Prefabricated Foot Orthoses With and Without Metatarsal Pads in People With Central Metatarsalgia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Compare the effects of prefabricated foot orthoses with and without metatarsal pads on pain intensity in the 2nd to 4th metatarsophalangeal joints, foot and ankle functional abilities as well as the occurrence of plantar callosities among patients with central metatarsalgia.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Metatarsalgia is a common condition that affecting about 10% of the general population. Central metatarsalgia involves pathology of the 2nd to 4th metatarsal and their respective metatarsophalangeal joints. This randomized control trial is designed to compare the effects of prefabricated foot orthoses with and without metatarsal pads on pain intensity, foot and ankle functional abilities as well as the occurrence of plantar callosities.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years;
  • Complain of foot pain on the 2nd to 4th MTPJs during walking in shoes, rating the pain intensity as ≥ 50mm on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS);
  • Able to be ambulant

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Peripheral vascular disease (PVD)
  • Neurological dysfunctions or neuromuscular disorders
  • Active infection, i.e., cellulitis, osteomyelitis, shingles
  • Cognitive impairment
  • History of lower limb surgery and currently undergoing rehabilitation
  • Active ulceration on foot and ankle
  • Current utilization of prescribed insoles

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental Group
A pair of prefabricated foot orthoses, each with a metatarsal pad to be affixed underneath
Other Names:
  • Slimflex® Amber Insoles
  • Podotech® High Density Metatarsal Pad- Wide Raise SD2121, SD2122, SD2123
Other: Control group
A pair of prefabricated foot orthoses only
Other Names:
  • Slimflex® Amber Insoles

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain intensity at the 2nd to 4th metatarsophalangeal joints during walking in shoes on Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, a follow-up at 4-8 weeks from baseline
VAS consists of a 100mm-long uninterrupted horizontal line, with 2 verbal description at each end. A score of 0mm represents "no pain" while 100 mm represents "the worst imaginable pain".
Baseline, a follow-up at 4-8 weeks from baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Size of callosities and corns on the plantar area of the 2nd to 4th metatarsophalangeal joints
Time Frame: Baseline, a follow-up at 4-8 weeks from baseline
Baseline, a follow-up at 4-8 weeks from baseline
Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)
Time Frame: Baseline, a follow-up at 4-8 weeks from baseline
FAOS consists of 42 questions, which are categorized into 5 subdomains: symptoms, pain, activities of daily living, sports and quality of life. Each question id rated on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 to 4 and subsequently transformed into a normalized score between 0 and 100. A score of 100 indicates absence of symptoms, while a score of 0 indicates the presence of severe symptoms.
Baseline, a follow-up at 4-8 weeks from baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Fung Ting Chan, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 26, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 18, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

April 18, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 1, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 1, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 5, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 16, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 15, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CUHK 2023.569

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metatarsalgia

Subscribe