Memory for Action in Neurological Patients (EMBODIMENT)

Memory for action is especially important in everyday life although current literature is not very abundant. The enactment effect (i.e. better memory for performed actions than for verbally encoded sentences) is usually described as a robust effect in aging and can be found in many diseases. Although the enactment effect has been studied for three decades, there is still no consensus on how it enhances memory. Therefore, in order to gain additional insight into the representational basis of the enactment effect, in the present study, the investigators propose to test neurological patients. The investigators suggested that memory for action should be better than memory for verbally encoded information in Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease.

If patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD) have no cognitive assessment during the last 6 months, then they will realize different tests: MMSE (1), HAD (2), a cognitive assessment (3); (4); BREF (5); Assessment of apraxia, (6). Controls will perform the same tests to verify that they have no cognitive impairment. Then, two experimental conditions will be presented in all patients and controls: a first in which participants will have to name drawings (verbal learning) and a second in which they will have to reproduce an action associated with drawings (action learning). Immediately after this learning phase, a recognition task will be available and therefore participants will have to recognize drawings that had been presented previously. The main criteria used in the statistical analysis will be the correct recognition score.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

  1. = Folstein et al., 1975,
  2. = Zigmond & Snaith, 1983,
  3. = Dubois et al., 2002;
  4. = Godefroy et al., 2008;
  5. = Dubois et Pillon, 2000;
  6. = Mahieux-Laurent, 2009.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

83

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Saint-Etienne, France, 42055
        • CHU de Saint-Etienne
      • Villeurbanne, France
        • Hcl - Cm2R

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria for 3 arms:

  • Patient affiliated to a social security system
  • Age between 55 and 80 years
  • Normal vision and hearing or successfully corrected
  • French mother tongue
  • Signature of consent by participants

Specific criteria for inclusion of MA patients:

  • Probable AD diagnosis made by a neurologist (McKhann et al., 2011)
  • Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE): score > 22
  • Stable treatment for two months minimum.

Specific criteria for inclusion of PD patients:

  • PD diagnosed by a neurologist (Postuma et al., 2015)
  • Stable treatment for two months minimum.
  • Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE): score > 27
  • Under dopaminergic treatment

Exclusion Criteria for 3 arms:

  • Other neurological or psychiatric history
  • Anxiety and depressive symptoms (assessed by the scale of depression-anxiety HAD; Zigmond & Snaith, 1983)
  • Inability to communicate
  • Significant impairment of judgment
  • Delusional or psychotic state

Criteria common for non-inclusion of AD and PD patients:

  • Other neurological or psychiatric history
  • Anxiety and depressive symptoms (assessed by the scale of depression-anxiety HAD; Zigmond & Snaith, 1983)
  • Inability to communicate
  • Significant impairment of judgment
  • Delusional or psychotic state

Criteria for non-inclusion of PD patients:

- Motor fluctuations

Criteria for non-inclusion of controls:

  • Psychiatric or neurological disorders
  • Anxiety and depressive symptoms (assessed by the scale of depression-anxiety HAD; Zigmond & Snaith, 1983)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: patients with Alzheimer disease
Behavioral: Cognitive tests Only patients with Alzheimer disease will be included in this arm. Patients will perform different tasks : MMSE, (Folstein et al., 1975), HAD (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; Zigmond & Snaith, 1983), a cognitive assessment (the 5 words test, Dubois et al., 2002; Trail Making test, Godefroy et al., 2008; BREF, Dubois et Pillon, 2000; Assessment of apraxia, Mahieux-Laurent, 2009) + the experimental task (verbal learning and action learning).
MMSE, (Folstein et al., 1975), HAD (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; Zigmond & Snaith, 1983), a cognitive assessment (the 5 words test, Dubois et al., 2002; Trail Making test, Godefroy et al., 2008; BREF, Dubois et Pillon, 2000; Assessment of apraxia, Mahieux-Laurent, 2009) + the experimental task (verbal learning and action learning).
Active Comparator: patients with Parkinson disease
Behavioral: Cognitive tests Only patients with Parkinson disease will be included in this arm. Patients will perform different tasks : MMSE, (Folstein et al., 1975), HAD (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; Zigmond & Snaith, 1983), a cognitive assessment (the 5 words test, Dubois et al., 2002; Trail Making test, Godefroy et al., 2008; BREF, Dubois et Pillon, 2000; Assessment of apraxia, Mahieux-Laurent, 2009) + the experimental task (verbal learning and action learning).
MMSE, (Folstein et al., 1975), HAD (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; Zigmond & Snaith, 1983), a cognitive assessment (the 5 words test, Dubois et al., 2002; Trail Making test, Godefroy et al., 2008; BREF, Dubois et Pillon, 2000; Assessment of apraxia, Mahieux-Laurent, 2009) + the experimental task (verbal learning and action learning).
Sham Comparator: healthy controls
Behavioral: Cognitive tests Only patients with healthy controls will be included in this arm. Controls will perform different tasks : MMSE, (Folstein et al., 1975), HAD (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; Zigmond & Snaith, 1983), a cognitive assessment (the 5 words test, Dubois et al., 2002; Trail Making test, Godefroy et al., 2008; BREF, Dubois et Pillon, 2000; Assessment of apraxia, Mahieux-Laurent, 2009) + the experimental task (verbal learning and action learning).
MMSE, (Folstein et al., 1975), HAD (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; Zigmond & Snaith, 1983), a cognitive assessment (the 5 words test, Dubois et al., 2002; Trail Making test, Godefroy et al., 2008; BREF, Dubois et Pillon, 2000; Assessment of apraxia, Mahieux-Laurent, 2009) + the experimental task (verbal learning and action learning).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of correct answers
Time Frame: Day 1
The gain provided by the verbal learning vs action learning (number of correct answers).
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Céline BORG, MD, celine.borg@univ-st-etienne.fr

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 26, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 21, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

February 21, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 22, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 22, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

July 26, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 17, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on Cognitive tests

3
Subscribe