The Effectiveness of Dry Needling and Classic Physiotherapy Programs in The Patients Suffering From Chronic Low Back Pain Caused by Lumbar Disc Hernia

August 11, 2016 updated by: Ender Angın, Eastern Mediterranean University

Aim: This study was planned for comparing physical activity levels, nutrition quality and quality of life of the individuals that are diagnosed with and without metabolic syndrome (MetS) and that live in the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC).

Method: 1200 individuals in total, in which (n: 660) individuals diagnosed with MetS and (n:660) individuals not diagnosed with MetS, participated in this study. Socio-demographic characteristics of the individuals that participated the study were registered with a survey form. The long form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire was used for determining physical activity levels of the individuals; whereas total numbers of daily steps were carried out with pedometer. The 14-item Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS) was used for the assessment of dietary habits, Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) was used for the assessment of health-related qualities of life of individuals and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) was used for the assessment of depression. In addition, biochemical analysis and anthropometric measurements of individuals were also taken.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

34

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

31 years to 66 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients among the ages of 35-70,
  • Suffering from LBP for at least 3 months,
  • Diagnosed with LDH having at least 1 active trigger point that can be cooperated .

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those with LDH that show neurological symptom,
  • Having any orthopaedic problem at lower extremity and lower back region,
  • Having sacroiliac joint problem, diagnosed with lumbar spondylolisthesis,
  • Having any neurologic, rheumatic, oncologic problem,
  • Who received any physiotherapy program at least 6 months before, patients having any corticosteroid treatment or oral medication
  • Those having needle phobia were not included in the trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dry Needling Application
Dry needling was performed on active and/or latent TPs at Gluteus Medius, Quadratus Lumborum, Multifidus, Erector Spinae muscles of the subjects in the study groups without applying any local anesthetic substance. The needles were applied with a 90º angle for Multifidus, Quadratus Lumborum and Gluteus Medius muscles; while they were applied with a 45º angle for Erector Spinae muscles. Thin stainless steel needles of 0.25x0.40 mm and 0.30x0.60 mm were applied in infiltration form on the TP through many points in conformity with the injection technique. The needles were kept on the body for 20 minutes and at the 10th minute, the needle was rolled and re-stimulation was enabled. The treatment was applied twice a week, which is equal to 6 sessions in total.
Dry needling was performed on active and/or latent TPs at Gluteus Medius, Quadratus Lumborum, Multifidus, Erector Spinae muscles of the subjects in the study groups without applying any local anesthetic substance. The needles were applied with a 90º angle for Multifidus, Quadratus Lumborum and Gluteus Medius muscles; while they were applied with a 45º angle for Erector Spinae muscles. Thin stainless steel needles of 0.25x0.40 mm and 0.30x0.60 mm were applied in infiltration form on the TP through many points in conformity with the injection technique.
Experimental: Classic Physiotherapy Program

Hot-pack was applied for 20 minutes. Burst TENS was applied on the lumbar regions of the cases of the control group paravertebrally with 4-electrode reusable silicone rubber. The dimensions of electrode is 5x5cm. Pulse width was set for 100 µsn, pulse frequency was set for 2 Hz, cycle time is set for 0.5 seconds and the amplitude was increased until visible muscle contraction was reached. If the muscle contraction is lost during the session, the amplitude was increased again. The period of treatment was 6 sessions in total with 25 minutes of each.

Ultrasound was paravertebrally applied to the lower back regions of the subjects. The treatment was applied with 1 MHz frequency, 1.5 W/cm2 power, for 6 minutes a day, for 10 sessions in total with direct contact with the patient's skin.

Hot-pack was applied for 20 minutes. Burst TENS was applied on the lumbar regions of the cases of the control group paravertebrally with 4-electrode reusable silicone rubber. The dimensions of electrode is 5x5cm. Pulse width was set for 100 µsn, pulse frequency was set for 2 Hz, cycle time is set for 0.5 seconds and the amplitude was increased until visible muscle contraction was reached. If the muscle contraction is lost during the session, the amplitude was increased again.

Ultrasound was paravertebrally applied to the lower back regions of the subjects. The treatment was applied with 1 MHz frequency, 1.5 W/cm2 power, for 6 minutes a day, for 10 sessions in total with direct contact with the patient's skin.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain assessed using the Short Form of McGill Pain Questionnaire-Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: 2 weeks
The Short Form of McGill Pain Questionnaire-Visual Analogue Scale (MPQ-SF-VAS) was used in order to determine the pain intensity that the investigators use as primary outcome measure in the investigators study.
2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 14, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 11, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

August 12, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 12, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 11, 2016

Last Verified

July 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • EasternMU

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on Dry Needling Application

Subscribe