- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02907463
EDWARDS INTUITY Elite Valve System (MISSION)
Assessing Clinical Outcomes Using the EDWARDS INTUITY Elite Valve System in Isolated AVR Using Minimally InvaSive Surgery In a EurOpean Multi-ceNter, Active, Post-market Registry
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Aortic valve replacement with mechanical or biological heart valves is the treatment of choice for aortic valve stenosis. Over the past several years, life expectancy has increased in industrial nations, but this has been accompanied by a rising rate of elderly patients with multiple illnesses.
Aortic stenosis remains the most common cause of adult valvular heart disease, the prevalence increasing with age. Average survival of patients treated conservatively has historically been reported as 2-5 years from the onset of symptoms. More recent studies have confirmed the dismal prognosis of severe aortic stenosis. Advanced age, reduced left-ventricular ejection fraction, congestive heart failure and renal insufficiency appear to be independent predictors of reduced survival. Asymptomatic patients with very severe aortic stenosis also share a poor prognosis with a high event rate and a risk of rapid functional deterioration. Early surgery offers a therapeutic option to improve clinical outcomes via decreasing cardiac mortality and improving symptoms.
Bioprostheses offer several advantages over mechanical bioprostheses, the most important being freedom from anticoagulation with a low rate of thromboembolic accidents.
In response to clinical need and in support of advances in minimally invasive surgical approaches to conventional AVR, Edwards Lifesciences developed the EDWARDS INTUITY Elite Valve System to achieve clinical benefits by reducing cardiopulmonary bypass and cross clamp times, while facilitating a less invasive approach to aortic valve replacement.
The system includes the EDWARDS INTUITY Elite Valve System, Model 8300AB and the EDWARDS INTUITY Elite Delivery System, Model 8300DB; the valve is based on prior heart valve designs which have a long history of safety and effectiveness and have incorporated additional features designed to improve patient outcomes and safety.
With only 3 guiding sutures and secure balloon expandable frame, the EDWARDS INTUITY Elite Valve system is well suited for smaller incisions and tight access, with an emphasis on procedural efficiency within existing operating suite of the surgeon.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Innsbruck, Austria, 6020
- Universitätsklinik für Herzchirurgie Medizinische Universität Innsbruck
-
Vienna, Austria, 1090
- Klinisshe Abteiluing Für Herz-thoraxchirurgie
-
-
-
-
-
Aarhus N, Denmark, 8200
- Aarhus Universitets Hospital Skejby
-
-
-
-
-
Dijon, France, 21074
- CHU Bocage Central Dijon
-
Pessac Cedex, France, 33 604
- Hôpital Cardiologique CHU Bordeaux Haut Leveque
-
-
-
-
-
Bad Neustadt An Der Saale, Germany, 97616
- Herz- und Gefäß-Klinik GmbH Bad Neustadt
-
Bochum, Germany, 44789
- Universitätsklinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum Klinik für Herz- und Thoraxchirurgie
-
Cologne, Germany, 50924
- Herzzentrum Uniklinik Köln
-
Hannover, Germany, 30625
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
-
Leipzig, Germany, 04289
- Herzzentrum Leipzig
-
Wurzburg, Germany, 97080
- University Hospital Wurzburg
-
-
-
-
-
Massa, Italy, 54100
- G. Pasquinucci Heart Hospital - "G.Monasterio" Foundation
-
Milan, Italy, 20138
- CentroCardiologico Monzino
-
Novara, Italy
- Clinica San Gaudenzio
-
Roma, Italy, 00168
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Policlinico
-
Udine, Italy, 33100
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "Santa Maria della Misericordia"
-
-
-
-
-
Luxembourg, Luxembourg, 1210
- Institut National de Chirurgie Cardiaque et Cardiologie Interventionnelle (INCCI)
-
-
-
-
-
Nieuwegein, Netherlands, 3430 EM / PO BOX 2500
- St Antonius Hospital
-
-
-
-
-
La Coruna, Spain
- Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña
-
Madrid, Spain, 28040
- Hospital Clínico San Carlos
-
-
Murcia
-
El Palmar, Murcia, Spain, 30120
- Hospital Universitario Virgen de La Arrixaca
-
-
-
-
-
Edinburgh, United Kingdom, EH16 4SA
- Royal Infirmary Hospital Edinburgh
-
London, United Kingdom, SE1 7EH
- St Thomas' Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
- Adult subjects, age18 or older, that have been diagnosed with aortic stenosis or stenosis-based insufficiency requiring isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR)
- Subjects whose medical records indicate they are a suitable candidate for Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS)
- Subjects whose treating physician is the Principle Investigator or a Sub-Investigator participating in the study and has been trained on the EDWARDS INTUITY Elite Valve System
- Subject shall be drawn from the general patient population served by each investigational center
- Candidates for this study must meet all of the following Inclusion criteria and none of the Exclusion criteria or intra-op exclusion criteria
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subject is 18 years or older
- Subject is symptomatic for aortic stenosis (AS) or mixed aortic stenosis and aortic insufficiency (AS/AI) disease for which isolated surgical aortic valve replacement without concomitant procedures is indicated according to International guidelines.
- Surgery starts with and is intended to be completed via a minimal invasive surgical approach. MIS is defined as a non-full sternotomy approach such as partial hemi-sternotomy, right anterior thoracotomy.
- Surgery is intended to be completed with an EDWARDS INTUITY Elite Heart Valve.
- Subject has signed and dated the investigation informed consent forms prior to any study-specific procedures are performed.
- Subject is geographically stable and agrees to attend follow-up assessments as specified in the protocol and informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subject is diagnosed with pure aortic insufficiency.
- Subject requires multiple valve replacement/repair
- Subject has Type 0 congenital true bicuspid aortic valve (i.e. absence of raphe and commissures are positioned about 180 degrees apart) or unicuspid aortic valve.
- Subject has severe ventricular dysfunction defined as LVEF < 25%.
- Subject has a history of active endocarditis and/or myocarditis ≤ 3 months before the intended treatment/scheduled surgery.
- Subject has had an acute MI ≤ 3 months before the intended treatment.
- Subject had a stroke or transient ischemic attack within six months prior to scheduled aortic valve replacement surgery.
- Subject is oxygen or ventilator dependent.
- Subject has life expectancy < 12 months.
- Female subject is pregnant or lactating.
- Subject with documented leukopenia (WBC < 3.5x 103/μL), anemia (Hb < 10.0 gm/dL or < 6.2 mmol/L), thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 100x 103/mL), or history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy.
Subject has renal insufficiency as determined by Serum creatinine
≥ 200 μmol/L (2.27 mg/dL) at screening or end-stage renal disease requiring chronic dialysis.
- Subject is currently participating in an investigational drug or device trial for which follow-up has not yet been completed.
- Minimally Invasive access to the heart is not possible due to anatomical constraints or any other pre-existing condition.
- Aneurysm of the aortic root and/or ascending aorta
Intra-operative exclusion criteria:
- Subject has Type 0 congenital true bicuspid aortic valve (i.e. absence of raphe and commissures are positioned about 180 degrees apart) or unicuspid aortic valve. (A non-congenital bicuspid valve without a distorted annulus would not be cause for exclusion.)
- Subject has calcium on the anterior mitral leaflet which cannot be removed.
- Subject has extensive calcification of the aortic root.
- Annular deformation which may or may not be caused by too extensive decalcification of the aortic annulus.
- The position of the coronary ostia relative to the EDWARDS INTUITY Elite Aortic Valve could result in obstruction of blood flow.
- Minimally Invasive access to the heart is not possible due to anatomical constraints or any other condition (including patient switched to a full sternotomy approach).
- The device is not available in the correct size for the subject.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Other
- Time Perspectives: Other
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Subject's Average Time Spent on Cardiopulmonary Cross Clamp
Time Frame: At time of surgery; an average of 1 hour
|
Cardiopulmonary cross clamp time is the amount of time that the patient's aorta (blood vessel) is clamped by a surgical instrument used in cardiac surgery.
This allows the normal blood flow to be sent to an artificial heart and lung machine to keep it at a constant temperature and oxygen level.
|
At time of surgery; an average of 1 hour
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Subject's Average Time Spent on Cardiopulmonary Bypass.
Time Frame: At time of surgery; an average of 1.5 hours
|
Cardiopulmonary bypass time is the amount of time that the patient's blood circulates through an artificial heart and lung machine during cardiac surgery.
|
At time of surgery; an average of 1.5 hours
|
|
Device Technical Success Rate
Time Frame: At time of surgery
|
The successful delivery and deployment of the EDWARDS INTUITY Elite valve and delivery system, and the subject leaving the operating room with valve in place.
|
At time of surgery
|
|
First Attempt Success Rate
Time Frame: At time of surgery
|
The successful delivery and deployment of the valve and delivery system during the first attempt, and subject leaving the operating room with EDWARDS INTUITY Elite valve in place.
|
At time of surgery
|
|
Procedural Success
Time Frame: Day of procedure and events occurring within 10 days of procedure
|
Procedural success is defined as device technical success followed by the absence of adverse events requiring device reoperation, requiring implantation of permanent pacemaker (with baseline sinus rhythm and no other conduction issues), or subject death, within discharge or 10 days post index procedure whichever comes first.
|
Day of procedure and events occurring within 10 days of procedure
|
|
Subject's Average Health Care Utilization
Time Frame: Day of surgical procedure through discharge from the hospital, an average of 3 days and 10 days respectively.
|
The average amount of time the subjects spent in the intensive care unit and the average total length of hospital stay after their heart valve replacement procedure.
|
Day of surgical procedure through discharge from the hospital, an average of 3 days and 10 days respectively.
|
|
Subject's Average Mean Gradient Measurements Over Time.
Time Frame: Baseline, Discharge and 6 months
|
Mean gradient is the average flow of blood through the aortic valve measured in millimeters of mercury.
Gradients are evaluated by echocardiography over time.
Mean gradient values depend on the size and type of valve.
|
Baseline, Discharge and 6 months
|
|
Subject's Average Peak Gradients Measurements Over Time.
Time Frame: Baseline, Discharge and 6 months
|
Peak gradient is the maximum value measured of flow of blood through the aortic valve as measured in millimeters of mercury.
Gradients are evaluated by echocardiography over time.
|
Baseline, Discharge and 6 months
|
|
Subject's Average Effective Orifice Area (EOA) Measurements Over Time
Time Frame: Baseline, Discharge and 6 months
|
Effective orifice area represents the cross-sectional area of the blood flow downstream of the aortic valve.
Effective orifice area is evaluated by echocardiography over time.
|
Baseline, Discharge and 6 months
|
|
Subject's Average Effective Orifice Area Index (EOAI) Measurement Over Time.
Time Frame: Discharge and 6 months
|
Effective orifice area index represents the minimal cross-sectional area of the blood flow downstream of the aortic valve divided by the person's body surface area.
Effective orifice area index is evaluated by echocardiography over time.
|
Discharge and 6 months
|
|
Subject's Average Performance Index Measurements Over Time.
Time Frame: Baseline, Discharge and 6 months
|
Performance index is defined as the subject's effective orifice area (the cross-sectional area of the blood flow downstream of the aortic valve) divided by the subject's pre-implant orifice area.
Effective orifice area is evaluated by echocardiography over time.
|
Baseline, Discharge and 6 months
|
|
Subject's Average Cardiac Output Over Time
Time Frame: Baseline, Discharge and 6 months
|
The amount of blood the heart pumps through the circulatory system in a minute.
|
Baseline, Discharge and 6 months
|
|
Subject's Average Cardiac Index
Time Frame: Discharge and 6 months
|
A measure of cardiac output per square meter of body surface area
|
Discharge and 6 months
|
|
Subject's Amount of Paravalvular Leak Over Time.
Time Frame: Discharge and 6 months
|
Paravalvular leak refers to blood flowing through a channel between the implanted artificial valve and the cardiac tissue as a result of inappropriate sealing.
Paravalvular leak is evaluated by echocardiography over time.
It is assessed on a scale from minimum of 0 to maximum of 4, where 0 = no leak, 1 = a trace leak, 2 = a mild leak, 3 = a moderate leak, and 4 = a severe leak.
Higher numbers on the scale show a worsening outcome.
|
Discharge and 6 months
|
|
Subject's Amount of Aortic Valvular Regurgitation Over Time.
Time Frame: Discharge and 6 Months
|
Aortic valvular regurgitation occurs when the aortic valve in the heart does not close tightly allowing some of the blood that was pumped out of the heart to leak back into it.
Aortic valvular regurgitation is evaluated by echocardiography over time.
It is assessed on a scale from minimum of 0 to maximum of 4, where 0 = no leak, 1 = a trace leak, 2 = a mild leak, 3 = a moderate leak, and 4 = a severe leak.
Higher numbers on the scale show a worsening outcome.
|
Discharge and 6 Months
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Early Adverse Events Divided by Number of Subjects (Expressed as a Percentage)
Time Frame: Events occurring within 30 days of procedure
|
Number of early adverse events occurring within 30 days of procedure divided by the number of enrolled subjects times 100
|
Events occurring within 30 days of procedure
|
|
Subject's Average SF-36 Physical Health Summary
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
|
The Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 - Physical Health Summary The SF-36 questionnaire scale ranges from 100, which reflects the best health status to 0, which reflects the worse health status.
|
Baseline and 6 months
|
|
Subject's Average SF-36 Mental Health Summary
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
|
The Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 - Mental Health Summary The SF-36 questionnaire scale ranges from 100, which reflects the best health status to 0, which reflects the worse health status.
|
Baseline and 6 months
|
|
Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: 6 months compared to baseline
|
The New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification system relates symptoms to everyday activities and the patient's quality of life. Class I. Patients with cardiac disease but without resulting limitation of physical activity. Class II. Patients with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Class III. Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Class IV. Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of heart failure or the anginal syndrome may be present even at rest. |
6 months compared to baseline
|
|
Subject's Average Score on the EQ-5D - Quality of Life Questionnaire Over Time
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
|
The EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) is a standardized questionnaire that asks subjects to rate themselves (no problems, some problems, extreme problems) on mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.
The scale is indexed and ranges from a minimum of 0.275 and a maximum of 1.000.
A lower number indicates the participants experiences more problems and a higher number indicates the participants experiences fewer problems.
|
Baseline and 6 months
|
|
Subject's Average Fitness for Hospital Discharge
Time Frame: Day of surgical procedure through discharge from the hospital; an average of 7 days
|
Considered as the day at which the patient was fit for hospital discharge.
|
Day of surgical procedure through discharge from the hospital; an average of 7 days
|
|
Number of Late Adverse Events Divided by Late Patient Years (Expressed as a Percentage)
Time Frame: Events occuring >= 31 days and up through 6 months
|
Number of late adverse events divided by the total number of late patient years x 100.
Late patient years are calculated from 31 days post-implant to the date of the last contact (follow up or adverse event).
|
Events occuring >= 31 days and up through 6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Christopher Young, MD FRCS, St. Thomas' Hospital
- Principal Investigator: Gunther Laufer, Prof. Dr. med, AKH Vienna Dep. of Cardiovascular Surgery
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2015-05 (APHM)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Aortic Stenosis
-
National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, PolandThe Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Polish Academy of SciencesRecruitingAortic Stenosis | Low-gradient Aortic StenosisPoland
-
MiRusRecruitingAortic Stenosis | Symptomatic Severe Native Aortic StenosisUnited States
-
Edwards LifesciencesCompletedAortic Stenosis | Aortic Regurgitation | Symptomatic Aortic StenosisChina
-
Anteris Technologies Ltd.Active, not recruitingAortic Stenosis | Aortic Valve Calcification | Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis | Symptomatic Aortic StenosisUnited States
-
Azienda Ospedaliera "Sant'Andrea"University of Bologna; Politecnico di Milano; Centro Cardiologico Monzino; I.R.C...RecruitingAortic Stenosis | Calcific Aortic Valve Disease | Chronic Coronary Syndrome | Calcific Aortic StenosisItaly
-
Hospices Civils de LyonCompleted
-
Edwards LifesciencesRecruitingAortic Valve Stenosis | Aortic Stenosis, CalcificUnited States, Australia, Switzerland, Canada, Japan, Netherlands
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedSevere Aortic Stenosis | Symptomatic Degenerative Aortic StenosisSpain, Italy, United Kingdom, Germany, Switzerland, Czechia, Australia, Belgium, Poland
-
University of AlbertaNot yet recruitingAortic Stenosis | Severe Aortic StenosisCanada
-
Medtronic CardiovascularCompleted