Genotype-supported Versus Conventional Proton Pump Inhibitor Dosing

May 25, 2021 updated by: University of Florida

Implementing Genomics in Practice (IGNITE) Proof of Concept Study: CYP2C19 Genotype-supported Versus Conventional Proton Pump Inhibitor Dosing

Investigators will conduct a comparative effectiveness study of genotype-supported vs. conventional PPI dosing. Adults and children presenting with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) or dyspepsia symptoms and either 1) being initiated on proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy or 2) with continued symptoms on current PPI therapy will be recruited from gastroenterology clinics and randomized to a genotype-supported versus conventional PPI therapy management strategy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The efficacy of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is highly dependent on plasma concentrations achieved following drug administration. All PPIs are metabolized in part by the CYP2C19 enzyme, which is encoded by the highly polymorphic CYP2C19 gene. Depending on the CYP2C19 genotype, individuals are classified into different metabolizer phenotypes: poor metabolizers (PM, 2 loss-of-function CYP2C19 alleles); intermediate metabolizers (IM, one loss-of-function allele); normal metabolizers (NM, no loss or gain-of-function alleles); rapid metabolizer (RM; one gain-of-function allele) and ultra-rapid metabolizers (UM, two gain-of function-alleles). Genetic variants in CYP2C19 are known to profoundly influence PPI plasma concentrations and consequently, response to PPI therapy. For example, individuals classified as either RM or UM have lower PPI concentrations compared to NM or loss-of-function (LOF) allele carriers, respond poorly to PPI therapy, and some fail to respond even when the PPI dose is increased. The investigators hypothesize that genotype-supported PPI dosing will lead to better GERD control and improvement in severity of dyspepsia symptoms compared to conventional dosing. The investigators will conduct a comparative effectiveness study of genotype-supported vs. conventional PPI dosing. Patients presenting with GERD or dyspepsia symptoms and either 1) being initiated on PPI therapy or 2) with continued symptoms on current PPI therapy will be recruited from gastroenterology clinics and randomized to a genotype-supported versus conventional PPI therapy management strategy. The investigators will integrate individual CYP2C19 genotype information into dosing decisions for the genotype-supported arm and compare change in symptom control from baseline to the end of the study between study arms. Given that PPI efficacy is related to PPI exposure and to metabolizer phenotype, individualizing treatment using CYP2C19 genotype-supported dosing is expected to improve symptom management. The investigators will also evaluate patient and clinician knowledge and attitudes about pharmacogenetics testing and physician acceptance of genetic information into clinical practice. Finally, the investigators will collect preliminary data on the potential impact of CYP2C19-supported PPI dosing on adverse event rates.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

185

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32610
        • University of Florida
      • Orlando, Florida, United States, 32827
        • Nemours Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years to 100 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Pediatric:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 5-17 years of age
  • diagnosed with GERD or any other stomach acid mediated condition for which a PPI treatment is provided
  • currently under a Proton Pump Inhibitor (PPI) therapy or will start a PPI therapy
  • Parents/legal guardians and or child must have access to internet and a valid email address

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of extensive esophageal or gastric surgery
  • diagnosed with any major chronic illness or conditions that in the opinion of the gastroenterologist that would interfere with participation in the study
  • history of Phenylketonuria (PKU) and patients with a history of previous adverse effects from PPI treatment or sensitivity to aspartame (NutraSweet, Equal)

Adult:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years of age or older
  • Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease symptoms
  • Being initiated on PPI therapy OR continues to have symptoms despite PPI therapy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Extensive esophageal or gastric surgery
  • Any chronic illness that would interfere with the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Adult Genotype guided treatment
For adults randomized to the genotype-supported arm a CYP2C19 genotype will be provided to physicians to assist in dosing.
All proton pump inhibitors are metabolized in part by the CYP2C19 enzyme, which is encoded by the highly polymorphic CYP2C19 gene. Based on variations within this gene the effectiveness of the drug may be reduced.
No Intervention: Adult Conventional treatment
For adults randomized to the conventional arm no genotype will be provided to physicians to assist in dosing.
Experimental: Pediatric Genotype guided treatment
For children randomized to the genotype-supported arm a CYP2C19 genotype will be provided to physicians to assist in dosing.
All proton pump inhibitors are metabolized in part by the CYP2C19 enzyme, which is encoded by the highly polymorphic CYP2C19 gene. Based on variations within this gene the effectiveness of the drug may be reduced.
No Intervention: Pediatric Conventional treatment
For children randomized to the conventional arm no genotype will be provided to physicians to assist in dosing.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ)
Time Frame: Change from baseline and 12 weeks
The RDQ was developed to monitor treatment response over time and evaluates 6 symptoms (12 items) covering 3 domains: heartburn, regurgitation, and upper abdominal pain. Each symptom is evaluated using a 6-point Likert scale to assess frequency and severity over the previous week. Each symptom is rated from 1 (did not have) to 6 (severe), and the RDQ mean score is calculated as the mean response to the 12 items. The RDQ mean score thus ranges from 1 to 6 and has been psycho-metrically validated.
Change from baseline and 12 weeks
Pediatric Sinonasal Symptom Survey (SN-5)
Time Frame: Week 4 (or next available results)
The Pediatric Sinonasal Symptom Survey (SN-5) is a validated 5-item scale with each item rated on a scale of worsening symptoms from 1 (none of the time) through 7 (all of the time). Items were averaged to yield a single total score ranging from 1 (better outcomes) to 7 (worse outcomes). The total SN-5 scores were compared between the conventional and genotype-guided dosing groups to determine if one group reported worsening symptoms over the other.
Week 4 (or next available results)
Safety Questionnaire (SafetyQ)
Time Frame: Over the 12-week period or last date of follow-up
Occurrence of adverse events over the 12 weeks was captured by the Safety Questionnaire (SafetyQ), which was to be completed on a weekly basis by the parents. The Safety Questionnaire (SafetyQ) asked about the presence of seven different respiratory symptoms since their last visit; upper respiratory infection, sore throat, strep throat, bronchitis, pneumonia, ear infection, and acute sinusitis. If a symptom was selected as being present since the last visit, the date of onset and patient-reported explanation of the symptom was recorded. The number of participants who reported infections were compared between each group.
Over the 12-week period or last date of follow-up
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) Assessment of Symptoms in Pediatrics Questionnaire (Gasp-Q)
Time Frame: Change in score from baseline to the week 4 ± 1-week
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) Assessment of Symptoms in Pediatrics Questionnaire (Gasp-Q) is a validated patient-reported outcome questionnaire that evaluated proton pump inhibitor therapy efficacy. Gasp-Q inquired about the severity and frequency of belly pain, chest pain, difficulty swallowing, choking, burping, nausea, pain after eating, night pain, and vomiting. If the symptom was present, the patient was asked to score the severity of the symptom ranging from 1 (Not at all severe) to 7 (Most severe). A composite score was then calculated based on the scoring of the 9 symptoms and ranged from 9 to 63.
Change in score from baseline to the week 4 ± 1-week
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Gastrointestinal Symptoms Module
Time Frame: Change in score from baseline to the week 4 ± 1-week
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Gastrointestinal Symptoms Module is a validated patient-reported outcome questionnaire and Likert response scale, to evaluate proton pump inhibitor therapy efficacy. The gastrointestinal problems included in the PedsQL were stomach pain and hurt, stomach upset, food and drink limits, trouble swallowing, heartburn and reflux, gas and bloating, constipation, diarrhea, and worry. Participants were asked to rate the symptoms from 0 (never a problem) to 4 (almost always a problem).
Change in score from baseline to the week 4 ± 1-week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Larisa Cavallari, PharmD, University of Florida
  • Principal Investigator: James P Franciosi, MD, Nemours Children's Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 17, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

July 17, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 10, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

October 12, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 21, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 25, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB201601774-N
  • U01HG007269 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Clinical Trials on CYP2C19 genotyping

3
Subscribe