Pulse Oximetry With Automated Verbal Prompts

August 14, 2019 updated by: University of Florida

Prevention of Post Operative Hypoxia in the Post Anesthesia Care Unit Using Pulse Oximetry With Automated Verbal Prompts

This study will evaluate the effectiveness of an automated voice prompting system on post operative hypoxia within the Postoperative Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU). This will be done to detect an improvement of the patient experience and provider care through a decrease in the number of peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) monitor alarms via the patients own ability to follow the instruction and improve their SpO2 levels.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The investigators will examine and observe the patient's stay in the PACU and utilize the pulse oximetry software and data to analyze the ability to evaluate the difference in patient oxygenation levels and supplemental oxygen use with automated verbal prompted monitoring versus a standard care control group. As well as determine if automated verbal prompted monitoring leads to less monitor alarms and subsequent improvement of subjective alarm fatigue and patient satisfaction with their care versus standard care.

The pulse oximeter will have a finger probe that will be attached to the patient's middle finger to read the patient's SpO2 levels. Each time the participant's pulse oximetry value declines to 93% or less, an automated verbal prompt, created via the software, will generate as a soft prompt. This will be followed up by a hard prompt if no improvement is seen in their oxygenation level after a period of time. A positive feedback elicitation will be given if the participant's saturation levels increase above 93%. This automated verbal prompt guidance will take place during the entirety of the investigational group's PACU stay.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

89

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32610
        • UF Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • planned general anesthetic
  • ability to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • use of regional anesthesia
  • altered mental status
  • hearing impairment requiring assistive devices
  • inability to hear normal conversational voice during the consent process
  • inability preoperatively to squeeze probe finger against thumb for any reason
  • baseline SpO2 less than or equal to 93% (on room air or baseline home oxygen requirement)
  • history of methemoglobinemia
  • suspected or confirmed carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning
  • planned admission to an intensive care unit

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control Non-Automated Group
Participants assigned to this group will receive the standard of care procedures for the monitoring and treatment of hypoxemia. Complete brief post-PACU stay survey.
Complete a brief post-PACU stay survey focused around their satisfaction and experience during their time in the PACU.
Experimental: Automated Prompt Group
Participants assigned to this group will utilize the automated verbal prompts to enable their ability to improve their current condition by following generated commands. Complete a questionnaire focused around their experience with the pulse oximetry software and its effects on the patient's satisfaction and experience.
Complete a brief post-PACU stay survey focused around their satisfaction and experience during their time in the PACU.
This pulse oximetry software will utilize automated verbal prompts that direct the patients to breathe when their pulse oximetry reading falls at or below 93%.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the frequency of a participant's SpO2 level falling below 87%
Time Frame: Change from baseline up to 24 hours
SpO2 will be monitored using the standard pulse oximeter system
Change from baseline up to 24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change between the study groups number of pulse oximetry alarms
Time Frame: Change from baseline up to 24 hours
SpO2 will be monitored using the standard physiologic monitoring system
Change from baseline up to 24 hours
Change between the study groups level of alarm fatigue
Time Frame: Change from baseline up to 24 hours
Number of participants reporting a decreased level of alarm noise
Change from baseline up to 24 hours
Change between the study groups level of postoperative care satisfaction
Time Frame: Change from baseline up to 24 hours
Number of participants reporting alarm noise affected their level of postoperative care satisfaction
Change from baseline up to 24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Samsun Lampotang, Ph.D., University of Florida

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 6, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

August 13, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 10, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

October 12, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 15, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 14, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB201600061

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypoxemia

Clinical Trials on Brief post-PACU stay survey.

3
Subscribe