Monitoring Devices in Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock

June 30, 2021 updated by: Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital

Comparison of the Accuracy of Monitoring Devices in Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock

Comparison of noninvasive cardiac output monitor (NICOM, Cheetah Medical) with Edwards FloTrac minimally-invasive cardiac output monitor in predicting fluid responsiveness in sepsis and septic shock.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Detailed Description

Study will evaluate ability of passive leg raise test to predict fluid responsiveness in patients in septic shock, on vasopressors, using both the NICOM and FloTrac devices. An increase in CI, SVI, or Pulse Pressure of >10% in response to the passive leg raise will be considered a positive passive leg raise test, and the same indicators will be considered a significant response to a fluid challenge with either crystalloids or colloids.Each device will be evaluated independently, but simultaneously.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

38

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Santa Barbara, California, United States, 93105
        • Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All adult patients with severe sepsis or septic shock, who have arterial catheter placed with FloTrac monitor, with or without a central venous catheter.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Declination of consent
  • Known allergy to adhesive
  • Pregnancy
  • Contraindication to raising legs or head to 45 degrees for 3 minute intervals

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: NICOM/FloTrac
500-1000ml Crystalloid fluid challenge (normal saline or plasmalyte) to be given for positive passive leg raise test by either device, and also will be given at baseline, regardless of baseline PLR response.
Use of noninvasive cardiac output and minimally invasive cardiac output monitors
500-1000ml Normal Saline or Plasmalyte intravenous fluid bolus will be given at baseline, and following a positive passive leg raise response as defined by a 10% or greater increase in any of: stroke volume index, cardiac index, or pulse pressure, as measured by the NICOM or FloTrac Monitors.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants who have agreement or disagreement between passive leg raise response and subsequent intravenous fluid challenge
Time Frame: 15 minutes

Positive passive leg raise response is defined as a 10% or greater increase in any of: stroke volume index, cardiac index, or pulse pressure following passive leg raise of 45 degrees for 3 minutes.

Positive response to fluid challenge is defined as a 10% or greater increase in any of the same parameters following a 500ml or 1000 ml fluid challenge given over 10-15 minutes, using the same instrument, (NICOM or FloTrac). A negative response would be < 10% increase in these parameters using the same instrument

15 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Decrease in vasopressor dose, in response to fluid therapy guided by passive leg raise response using NICOM or Flotrac devices
Time Frame: 48 hours
48 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 30, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

November 23, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 2, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Septic Shock

Clinical Trials on NICOM/FloTrac

3
Subscribe