A Biomarker Study in Advanced Mucosal or Acral Lentiginous Melanoma Receiving Nivolumab in Combination With Ipilimumab

March 7, 2024 updated by: Georgetown University

A Study to Estimate the Anti-Tumor Activity and Identify Potential Predictors of Response in Patients With Advanced Mucosal or Acral Lentiginous Melanoma Receiving Standard Nivolumab in Combination With Ipilimumab Followed by Nivolumab Monotherapy

Participants with advanced or metastatic mucosal melanoma (cohort A) and acral lentiginous melanoma (cohort B) eligible for treatment with nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab followed by nivolumab therapy will submit tissue blocks from tumors of malignant melanoma for histopathology review and immunohistochemistry analysis at Georgetown University-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center. Pretreatment blood will be drawn and stored in the Melanoma Research Foundation Breakthrough Consortium Virtual Repository at each participating institution. At the end of participation, samples will be sent to Georgetown University-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center for processing and storage. An optional pretreatment biopsy of an accessible tumor lesion will be performed in a subset of enrolled patients. Patients will receive nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab according to the standard FDA approved treatment regimen.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Immunotherapy with HD-IL-2 has produced durable benefit in 10% of patients with metastatic cutaneous melanoma. The antitumor activity of IL-2 has been limited at least in part by immunosuppressive and immune-regulatory forces within the tumor microenvironment. Antibodies against CTLA4 (e.g. ipilimumab), PD1 and its ligand (PD-L1) produced long-term benefit in approximately 20-40% of patients with advanced melanoma. In addition, the combination of ipilimumab with the anti-PD1 antibody, nivolumab, has shown tumor responses in up to 60% of patients with advanced melanoma. These findings have led to FDA approval of ipilimumab and nivolumab as an indication for treatment of patients with advanced melanoma and nivolumab for other cancers. While these data are exciting, only a few patients enrolled to the prior studies had metastatic MCM or ALM. There is no prospective immunotherapy studies conducted in MCM or ALM-specific population. Therefore the activity of the ipilimumab + nivolumab combination in these subsets or patients remains unknown

Reliable predictive biomarkers for the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors are needed to identify pretreatment those patients most likely to respond and early on in treatment assays could help identify mechanisms of tumor response and resistance necessary to improve therapy. Although tumor PD-L1 expression in tumor confers higher treatment response rate, responses to nivolumab or nivolumab + ipilimumab alone were noted in 55% and 41% of patients, respectively, with PD-L1- tumors. Therefore, more reliable predictive biomarkers are needed.

Recently, extensive studies on metastatic colorectal cancer have demonstrated that a new scoring system as well as density of immune cells infiltrates at the center of the tumor and its invasive margin, described as Immunoscore, could accurately separate a group of patients with high Immunoscore with improved DFS, and OS from those with low Immunoscore where the histopathological staging system cannot. A recent study has also demonstrated relationship between degree of pre-treatment CD8+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) infiltration and PD-L1 expression at the invasive margin of the advanced cutaneous melanoma and improved long-term clinical benefits in patients with advanced melanoma who received pembrolizumab monotherapy. Further, there appeared to be an association between tumor response and clonality of the immune infiltrate based on a next-generation sequencing method used to evaluate T-cell receptor rearrangement pre- and in response to checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Also, high mutational burden correlated with overall survival in patients with cutaneous melanoma treated with ipilimumab or lung cancer treated with anti-PD1. However, the biology of MCM and ALM are distinct from cutaneous melanoma at multiple levels. Consequently, the utility of predictive biomarkers developed for cutaneous melanoma remains unknown.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

14

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20007
        • Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20010
        • Washington Cancer Institute at MedStar Washington Hospital Center
    • Florida
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33612
        • H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute
    • New Jersey
      • Hackensack, New Jersey, United States, 07601
        • John Theurer Cacner Center at Hackensack University Medical Center
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients must have histologically confirmed MCM or ALM that is metastatic or unresectable.
  • Patients must be eligible to receive nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab treatment per institutional guidelines.
  • Patients must have a tissue block (or 20 unstained slides) available with adequate tumor to perform multiplex immunohistochemistry and nucleic acids analyses ( i.e. whole exome sequencing) Patients with only a previous fine-needle aspirate are ineligible for enrollment.
  • Patients must be willing to donate a small amount of whole blood prior to treatment and during treatment for laboratory analysis.
  • Patients must give informed consent prior to initiation of therapy.
  • Patients must be ambulatory with good performance status (ECOG 0 or 1)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who do not have available tissue for immunohistochemistry and nucleic acids analyses.
  • Patients who have received prior immunotherapy for unresectable or metastatic disease.
  • Patients with untreated brain metastases, leptomeningeal disease, or seizure disorders are ineligible. Patients with a history of brain metastases must have completed treatment (i.e. surgery or radiation) 1 month prior to enrollment and have no evidence of disease or edema on brain CT or head MRI.
  • Patients with inadequate tissue for analysis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Nivolumab-Ipilimumab Combination Therapy
All patients will receive nivolumab administered IV over 60 minutes at 1 mg/kg combined with ipilimumab administered IV over 90 minutes at 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks for 4 treatment cycles (Induction) then continue with nivolumab administered IV over 60 minutes at 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks until progression, intolerable toxicity, or a maximum of 48 weeks, whichever comes first (Maintenance). Patients exhibiting complete response (CR) should continue nivolumab monotherapy at least 12 weeks beyond documentation of CR, if possible.
nivolumab administered IV over 60 minutes at 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks for 4 treatment cycles (Induction) then continue with nivolumab administered IV over 60 minutes at 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks
Other Names:
  • BMS-936558
  • Opdivo
ipilimumab administered IV over 90 minutes at 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks for 4 treatment cycles (Induction)
Other Names:
  • BMS-734016
  • Yervoy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Objective Response Rate (ORR) With Mucosal Melanoma (MCM)
Time Frame: 24 months
ORR, defined as complete response [CR] + partial response [PR] per RECIST 1.1 criteria and to compare this response rate to the response rate of patients with "good" molecular predictive features
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Objective Response Rate With Acral Lentiginous Melanoma (ALM)
Time Frame: 24 months
ORR, defined as complete response [CR] + partial response [PR] per RECIST 1.1 criteria and to compare this response rate to the response rate of patients with "good" molecular predictive features
24 months
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: 33 months
Progression-free survival is defined as the time from the date of treatment initiation until the date that disease progression criteria are met or the date death without progression, or is censored at the date of last disease assessment without evidence of progression.
33 months
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: 44 months
OS is calculated from the date of treatment initiation to the date of death, or censored at date of last contact.
44 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 26, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 28, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

August 2, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 23, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

December 1, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 4, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 7, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mucosal Melanoma

Clinical Trials on Nivolumab

3
Subscribe