Ferumoxytol Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Chronic Kidney Disease (FeMRA in CKD)

February 8, 2019 updated by: Sokratis Stoumpos

Use of Ferumoxytol Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Cardiovascular Assessment in Late-stage Chronic Kidney Disease

Conventional vascular imaging techniques are often either contra-indicated in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients due to their relative invasiveness, risks and cost. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) requires radiation and nephrotoxic iodinated contrast which may precipitate significant worsening of renal function and even prompt the need for institution of dialysis. Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) using gadolinium-based contrast agents has been associated with the rare disease nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Alternative imaging methods also have drawbacks: for example, this frail patient group has a higher risk of complications from conventional invasive catheter-based angiography, non-contrast-enhanced MRA allows visualization of smaller arteries but is less accurate for larger vascular structures, and ultrasound is often not appropriate for evaluation of the deep vessels of the abdomen and pelvis.

Ferumoxytol is an ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide particle encapsulated by a semisynthetic carbohydrate, which was initially developed as a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agent in 2000. However, interest in ferumoxytol as a therapeutic agent for the treatment of iron deficiency anaemia in the setting of CKD eclipsed its use as MRI contrast agent. During the last decade, ferumoxytol has gained appeal as an MRI contrast agent in patients with estimated glomerular filtration rates <30mL/min and there are reports in the literature for its safe use and utility in both adult and pediatric patients with CKD.

Participants will be selected from those who have been referred for assessment prior to kidney transplant or prior to vascular access creation for haemodialysis and will be divided into three groups. The first group will include patients who will undergo a CTA of abdominal and aortoiliac vasculature as part of their preparation for potential kidney transplantation. The second and third groups will include patients who are having a fistula or a graft created for dialysis, respectively. These patients are routinely having US vascular mapping to visualise the blood vessels before a fistula or a graft is created. Additionally, patients included in the second and third groups are routinely having surveillance scans of their fistula or graft at 6 weeks following creation. Study participants undergoing standard imaging tests as part of their clinical care will also have ferumoxytol-enhanced MRA (FeMRA).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a comparative study in a cohort of patients with significant renal impairment. Study participants undergoing standard imaging tests as part of their clinical care will also have FeMRA. The investigators will compare outcomes of interest including quality of image and diagnostic accuracy in a head-to-head design.

These hypotheses will be tested:

  1. FeMRA is superior to CTA for characterisation of abdominal and aortoiliac anatomy (pre-transplant assessment) before implantation of a kidney graft as it can robustly evaluate both arterial and venous anatomy.
  2. FeMRA is superior to Doppler US for characterisation of vascular anatomy (vascular mapping) before vascular access creation as it can robustly assess central vein patency.
  3. FeMRA is superior to Doppler US for characterisation of fistula (or graft) arm vascular anatomy (surveillance) at 6 weeks after fistula creation.
  4. Integrated cardiac and vascular assessment using FeMRA before vascular access creation can better predict outcomes.

Patients will be selected from those who have been referred for assessment prior to kidney transplant or prior to vascular access creation for haemodialysis and will be divided into 3 different groups. The first group (group A) will include patients who are having CTA of abdominal and aortoiliac vasculature performed for pre-transplant assessment. The other two groups will include patients who are having US vascular mapping performed before arteriovenous fistula (group B) or synthetic graft (group C) creation for haemodialysis. These patients are routinely having US Doppler of their fistula arm at 6 weeks following access creation for surveillance. FeMRA will be performed in addition to standard care, i.e. patients in group A will have a single FeMRA at baseline while patients in groups B and C will have a FeMRA at baseline and a second one at 6 weeks. All patients will undergo Cardiac MR with Ferumoxytol at the same time. This is to assess whether cardiac parameters before transplantation or access creation are associated with outcomes (baseline Cardiac MR). The 6-weeks Cardiac MR aims to assess cardiovascular functional parameters (blood flow, cardiac output, systolic and diastolic function) after vascular access creation.

Imaging will be performed on a 3T Prisma (Siemens) MRI system. A total dose of 3mg of Ferumoxytol/kg of patient weight will be delivered but not to exceed one vial (510mg). In all cases Ferumoxytol will be diluted to a concentration no greater than 1 part Ferumoxytol to 4 parts 0.9% sodium chloride and will be administered with several spaced infusions of diluted agent for the different imaging components. Ferumoxytol infusion is controlled by a sophisticated MRI compatible infusion pump for precise control over infusion rate. This procedure would take a minimum of 20 minutes before the full cumulative dose is administered for a usual size patient and even longer for the maximum expected dose of 510 mg in a very large patient. As such the investigators are anticipating that patients will be scheduled for up to 45 minutes of imaging.

Small fractions of the dose will be administered initially as an infusion for myocardial perfusion and first pass imaging with a dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) technique. After the full dose is administered, steady state high-resolution imaging will be undertaken using an ultrafast spoiled gradient echo sequences. Cardiac MR consisting of cardiac output, end systolic volume, end diastolic volume, aortic distensibility and flow Cardiac MR will be performed. Images will be obtained for left ventricular and right ventricular mass and function plus flow quantification.

The MRA will be reviewed by vascular radiology consultants (with between 6 and 20 years' experience) and a standard clinical report issued on the findings. At the end of the study, all imaging (US Doppler, CTA and investigatory MRA) will be jointly reviewed by the radiologists and other investigators in the study team. An independent radiologist that is not directly involved in the study will also review images. All discrepancies will be resolved by mutual consensus between the radiologists.

The general analytical approach will be to estimate accuracy (95% CI), sensitivity (95% CI) and specificity (95% CI) of FeMRA and standard imaging techniques. In addition, Cohen's κ with 95% CI will be computed to quantify the agreement between the FeMRA and standard imaging findings. A value of κ>0.7 indicates a high level of agreement. Because multiple image locations from each patient will be used for the statistical evaluation (at least 20 vascular cross sections from each scan), the interdependence of each location for a given patient examination will be assessed by use of a κ statistic. A value of κ<0.4 indicates weak or no interdependence. The investigators aim to recruit 20 patients in group A and 10 patients in each of the other two groups. Assuming that FeMRA will identify 10% more clinically significant vascular anatomic characteristics compared with CTA/US, then one would need to study 180 vascular sections in total to show a significant difference between tests using chi-squared test, assuming power of 80% and probability of type 1 error of 5%.

To evaluate associations between anatomical predictor variables and outcomes, multiple linear and logistic mixed-effects regression models will be used. Associations of fistula and graft outcomes with predictors will be treated as uniform across all anatomical configurations unless there is strong statistical or biological evidence to suggest otherwise. Based on data from a retrospective study performed at the same centre, the investigators assume a fistula failure rate of 30%.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Glasgow, United Kingdom, G12 8TA
        • NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Planned surgical creation of an autogenous upper-extremity fistula or synthetic graft.

    AND Current treatment with maintenance haemodialysis or anticipated treatment with maintenance haemodialysis within 6 months after planned fistula or graft creation surgery.

    OR Planned imaging of abdominopelvic vasculature as part of pre-transplant assessment.

  2. Anticipated ability to comply with study procedures.
  3. Ability to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Life expectancy ≤6 months.
  2. Frail, elderly patients with multiple or serious co-morbidities (doctor's discretion).
  3. Pregnancy, lactation or women of child-bearing potential not willing to use effective contraception for the duration of the study.
  4. Standard contra-indications to MRI and severe claustrophobia.
  5. History of allergic reaction to any intravenous iron product, known hypersensitivity to excipients, asthma, eczema, atopy, patients with immune or inflammatory conditions (e.g. systemic lupus, rheumatoid arthritis), any conditions associated with iron overload (e.g. haemochromatosis, chronic liver disease, or blood disorders requiring frequent blood transfusions), and known history of drug allergy.
  6. Any other reason considered by a study physician to make subject inappropriate for inclusion.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Pre-transplant assessment
  • CTA abdominal and aortoiliac vasculature before transplantation
  • FeMRA abdominal and aortoiliac vasculature & CMR before transplantation
Mapping & surveillance (for fistula)
  • US vascular mapping before fistula creation
  • 6 week US fistula arm
  • FeMRA fistula arm/central veins & CMR before fistula creation and at 6 weeks
Mapping & surveillance (for graft)
  • US vascular mapping before graft creation
  • 6 week US graft arm
  • FeMRA fistula arm/central veins & CMR before graft creation and at 6 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of FeMRA with standard imaging techniques in assessment of vascular anatomy.
Time Frame: Baseline and week 6
Multiple cross sections of various vascular beds obtained with currently used imaging techniques will be compared with matched sections obtained with FeMRA in a blinded fashion. The emphasis is generally on imaging quality and diagnostic accuracy on identification of clinically significant anatomic characteristics or lesions.
Baseline and week 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of FeMRA with standard imaging techniques in identification of anatomical predictors of vascular access outcomes.
Time Frame: Up to 2 years

Outcomes include:

  1. Sonographic anatomical fistula maturation at 6 weeks after creation.

    Criteria of sonographic AVF maturation include:

    • AVF lumen diameter >4mm and
    • AVF blood flow >500mL/min
  2. Fistula or graft complications: stenosis, thrombosis, hand ischaemia, aneurysm or pseudoaneurysm, infiltration, fistula bleeding, and infection.
  3. Fistula or graft procedures: surgical revision, angioplasty, stent placement, thrombolysis or thrombectomy, ligation of accessory veins, superficialisation of vein, transposition of vein, central venous catheter use, and placement of new arteriovenous access.
Up to 2 years
Association between cardiac function and fistula (or graft) outcomes assessed by FeMRA.
Time Frame: Up to 2 years
Up to 2 years
Effect of successful fistula (or graft) creation on cardiac function assessed by FeMRA.
Time Frame: Week 6
Week 6
Utility of FeMRA in assessment of cardiac anatomy and function before listing for kidney transplantation.
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 12, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 14, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 14, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

December 19, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 12, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2019

Last Verified

February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

No plans for sharing any data at the moment.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Kidney Transplantation

3
Subscribe