Respiratory Physiotherapy Change Premature Pain With Pneumonia (RPCPPWP)

January 19, 2017 updated by: Paulo Eduardo Santos Avila, Amazon University

Effects of Vibration Techniques and Expiratory Flow Acceleration in Premature Pain Parameters With Pneumonia

Objective to evaluate the effects of vibration techniques and acceleration of expiratory flow on pain parameters in preterm infants diagnosed with pneumonia hospitalized in the Intensive Care Unit and Neonatal Intermediate Care Unit. The Method is a descriptive and interventional study, in which 28 PTNB were randomly divided into two groups: Group 1 submitted to the vibration technique and Group 2 - to the acceleration of the expiratory flow, both techniques were applied in an interval of up to ten minutes, for Three consecutive days. The pain indicators were evaluated according to the PIPP scale in three moments. For statistical analysis, the Friedman tests and Variance Analysis were applied, the level of significance adopted was 5%.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A descriptive, longitudinal, quantitative approach was carried out in which 28 preterm infants with diagnosis of pneumonia hospitalized in the NICU and NICU of the Santa Casa de Misericórdia Foundation of Pará (FSCMPA) participated in the study period from July to October 2016. The research obeyed ethical principles Of Resolution 466/12 of the National Health Council (CNS) and was initiated after approval by the Research Ethics Committee of the FSCMPA, opinion 1,690,842. The selection criteria were obtained through the collection of data from the records of newborns and annotated in standardized charts. Once included in the study, the patients were randomly divided into two groups of 14 PTNB, the premature group 1 were submitted to the vibration technique (rhythmic and rapid movements of isometric contraction of the forearm, applied manually over the anterior chest region) and the Of Group 2 to the acceleration of the expiratory flow (soft compression of the thorax applied with one hand in the lower ribs and the other using the ulnar border on the supramammary line). Both techniques were performed with the premature dorsal position, at the time of the expiratory phase, with a maximum duration of 10 minutes, once a day, for three consecutive days, in the afternoon period and by the same physiotherapist. After this procedure, aspiration of the upper airways of premature infants was performed. The pain indicators of the preterm infants (PIPP) of the two groups were evaluated in three moments, before the application of the technique (T1), immediately after the application of the technique (T2) and 15 minutes After its completion (T3), by a researcher previously trained and blind regarding the procedure performed. PIPP is a multidimensional instrument that evaluates pain indicators in the newborn using the following parameters: gestational age and alertness (contextual factors), heart rate and peripheral oxygen saturation (physiological indicators) that were measured by means of a pulse oximeter Of the brand (Dixtal®) and three aspects of facial mimetics (behavioral factors). Their scores may range from 0 to 21, scores less than or equal to 6 indicate absence of pain, scores above 6 represent mild pain and scores higher than 12 indicate the presence of moderate to severe pain.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

28

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 day to 4 weeks (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Included in this study were RNPT of both genders, of low weight (1500 to 2500g) or normal weight (over 2500g).
  • With clinical diagnosis of pneumonia.
  • Who were on spontaneous ventilation (ambient air or with the aid of oxygen therapy).
  • Agreed to participate in the research, through the signing of the Informed Consent Form for minors.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Newborns with a gestational age greater than 37 weeks.
  • With diseases or procedures that cause pain in the newborn such as necrotizing enterocolitis, thoracotraumatis, thoracic or abdominal drainage, and umbilical catheter.
  • Who were less than 72 hours Life with birth weight less than 1500g (very low weight and extreme low weight).
  • As well as those who underwent invasive or non-invasive mechanical ventilation.
  • Sedated.
  • With vasoactive drugs or medications that interfered in the physiological parameters of pain.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Vibration technique
Rhythmic and rapid movements of isometric contraction of the forearm, applied manually over the anterior region of the thorax
Comparison of different technique
Experimental: Acceleration of expiratory flow
Soft compression of the thorax applied with one hand on the lower ribs and the other using the ulnar border on the supramammary line
Comparison of different technique

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of the parameters of the pain profile scale in preterm infants at different times
Time Frame: The total collection period was six months, and each procedure was performed on the volunteers for three consecutive days.
The pain indicators of the preterm infants (PIPP) of the two groups were evaluated in three moments, before the application of the technique (T1), immediately after the application of the technique (T2) and 15 minutes After its termination (T3), by a researcher previously trained and blind as to the procedure performed
The total collection period was six months, and each procedure was performed on the volunteers for three consecutive days.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 21, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 19, 2017

First Posted (Estimate)

January 23, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 23, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 19, 2017

Last Verified

January 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Vibration technique

Subscribe