What is the Effective Pulmonary Physiotherapy Method in Critically Care Patients?

January 1, 2016 updated by: ILKE KUPELI

Can High Frequency Chest Wall Oscillation Accelerate the Discharged of Intubated Intensive Care Patients?

Effects of the high frequent chest wall oscillation technique applied on the patients who were intubated in intensive care unit were investigated.

A total of 30 patients who were intubated and under the mechanical ventilator supplied, were included in the study. While the control group (n=15) received routine pulmonary rehabilitation technique, the study group (n=15) was administered high frequency chest wall oscillation for 72 hours as 4 times of 15-minute intervals, in addition to the pulmonary rehabilitation technique. Patients 'APACHE-II scores, dry sputum weight, Lung Collapse Index and blood gas values were measured at the hours 24th, 48th and 72nd, and endotracheal aspirate culture was studied at initial and 72nd. In addition, patient outcomes were evaluated at the end of the first week.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • aged over 18 years
  • Patients with more than three days intubated, in critical care unit of Mengücekgazi Training and Research Hospital

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with rib fracture
  • acute hemorrhage
  • unstable intracranial pressure
  • existence of chest drainage tube and those have history of spinal surgery,
  • skin infection in the back and chest area and subcutaneous emphysema

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: routine pulmonary rehabilitation
routine pulmonary rehabilitation consisted of position giving technique
received routine pulmonary rehabilitation consisted of position giving technique (left lateral, supine, right lateral), chest wall percussion, postural drainage and airway aspiration at every 3 hours.
administered chest wall vibration technique in addition to the routine pulmonary rehabilitation method for 72 hours. Chest vibration method was applied with 7-10 hz frequency given by a ped wrapped around the thorax and pulmonary rehabilitation with 3 mmHg pressure four times a day with 15-minute periods (TheVest® Model 205).
Active Comparator: chest wall vibration technique
chest wall vibration technique in addition to the routine pulmonary rehabilitation method for 72 hours.
received routine pulmonary rehabilitation consisted of position giving technique (left lateral, supine, right lateral), chest wall percussion, postural drainage and airway aspiration at every 3 hours.
administered chest wall vibration technique in addition to the routine pulmonary rehabilitation method for 72 hours. Chest vibration method was applied with 7-10 hz frequency given by a ped wrapped around the thorax and pulmonary rehabilitation with 3 mmHg pressure four times a day with 15-minute periods (TheVest® Model 205).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
change from baseline of Lung Collapse Index (LCI) values were recorded by listening both the lungs and scoring between 0 and 4 (0: normal expansion, 1: single lobe collapse, 2: 2 lobe collapse, 3: multiple lobe collapse) at six month
Time Frame: six month
six month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
weight of the dry sputum after six month
Time Frame: six month
six month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 30, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 1, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

January 5, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 5, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 1, 2016

Last Verified

January 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atelectasis

Clinical Trials on routine pulmonary rehabilitation

3
Subscribe