Local Muscle Vibration Versus Muscle Energy Technique In Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction (SIJD)

January 25, 2024 updated by: Asmaa Abou Almakarem Ali Radwan, Cairo University

The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of Local Muscle Vibration versus Muscle energy technique on pain intensity, pain pressure threshold, functional disability, and innominate angle tilt in SIJD.

This study will try to answer the following question:

What is the effect of Local Muscle Vibration compared to Muscle energy technique on pain intensity, pain pressure threshold, functional disability, and innominate angle tilt in SIJD?

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Clinicians will attempt to identify the primary factors that contribute to the development of low back pain. These factors are related to specific areas of malfunction that may irritate the tissues and create pain, or cause pain through hypersensitivity of nociceptive pathways in the CNS. Joint dysfunction is one risk factor, which is defined as "loss of joint play movement that cannot be produced by voluntary muscles". Pain in the joint can result from joint dysfunction, in addition to joint dysfunction, muscle dysfunction is evaluated. History, inspection, palpation, and flexibility tests can all be used to determine this.

Muscle energy technique is based on the concepts of Autogenic Inhibition and Reciprocal Inhibition, to lengthen a shortened muscle, mobilize a stiff joint, strengthen a weak muscle, and reduce localized edema and passive congestion. Several studies approved that (MET) affects positively on SIJD cases.

Local Muscle Vibration is used to pain relief, stimulate edema absorption, improve blood flow, alleviate wound healing, and for its anti-inflammatory and ant-adhesion effects. In addition, pain relief effect have also been widely demonstrated. Vibration comprised of low-magnitude high-intensity stimuli which represents a suitable technique to securely transmit appropriate mechanical signals to patients who are unable to exercise to increase musculoskeletal strength. According to a narrative literature review contain about 35 study descuss effects of local vibration therapy on various performance parameters, LMV have apositive effect on muscle activation, strengh, power and joint range of motion.

According to Iodice et al (2011), local administration of high-frequency VT resulted in significant increase in muscle function after several weeks however, some hormonal alterations and moderate performance gains were observed after a single session. This study will try to investigate the effect of Local Muscle Vibration versus Muscle energy technique, which is more effective in reducing low back pain and disability in cases of SIJD. Up to the authors knowledge no previous study discussed the difference between (LMV) and (MET) on SIJD.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Recruiting
        • The faculty of physical therapy, Cairo university, and Gezira Youth Center
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

both male and female participants with ages between 20-40.

  • Pain intensity is greater than 3 over the scale of VAS.
  • Pain around SIJ (around PSIS and sacral sulcus).
  • Participants with at least three positives out of six provocation and motion palpation tests that have been validated (distraction, compression, Gaenslen, posterior friction test, sacral thrust, and FABER tests).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neurological impairments in the leg
  • Sacroiliitis
  • Spondylolisthesis
  • pre-diagnosed central or peripheral nervous system disease
  • The current pregnancy
  • rheumatoid arthritis
  • Major surgery of lower limbs and spine

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group (A) (Muscle Energy Techniques )
Muscle Energy Techniques
Apply Local Muscle Vibration compared to Muscle energy technique on patients with sacroiliac joint dysfunction and note the effect on pain intensity, pain pressure threshold, functional disability, and innominate angle tilt in SIJD.
Active Comparator: Group( B) (Local Muscle Vibration)
Local Muscle Vibration
Apply Local Muscle Vibration compared to Muscle energy technique on patients with sacroiliac joint dysfunction and note the effect on pain intensity, pain pressure threshold, functional disability, and innominate angle tilt in SIJD.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain intensity
Time Frame: Assessment before treatment, then immediately after the intervention, then finally follow up after 2 weeks
VAS in the simple model, which will be used as a self-reported method of pain intensity measurement, the patient will be asked to put a mark point at the scale range (from 0 to 10 cm). This assessment procedure will be applied before and after treatment procedure.
Assessment before treatment, then immediately after the intervention, then finally follow up after 2 weeks
Pain pressure threshold
Time Frame: Assessment before treatment, then immediately after the intervention, then finally follow up after 2 weeks
PPT should be measured on both sides at the level of right and left posterior inferior iliac spines (PIIS). With the patient is a prone position, two algometer measurements will be taken before and after treatment at the level of (PIIS). All measurements will be recorded at intervals of 30 second. The patient will be instructed to report when the sensation beginning of pain.
Assessment before treatment, then immediately after the intervention, then finally follow up after 2 weeks
Back functional disability
Time Frame: Assessment before treatment, then immediately after the intervention, then finally follow up after 2 weeks
This questionnaire is Self-reported pain and disability method (Arabic model). The therapist will ask the patient ten questions covering pain severity, personal care, lifting, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, social life, travelling, and changing degrees of pain. Each part has six statements, each with a score ranging from 0 (showing no disability) to 5 (representing maximum disability). The final score was calculated as a percentage out of 50, representing perceived disability at the time. The validated Arabic version of ODI will be used in this study.
Assessment before treatment, then immediately after the intervention, then finally follow up after 2 weeks
The innominate angle tilt
Time Frame: Assessment before treatment, then immediately after the intervention, then finally follow up after 2 weeks
The patient will be instructed to march 10 steps in place before standing in a fully erect posture without bending ankles, knees, or hips, feet in front 30.5 cm apart, and arms across the chest. The therapist will stand beside the patient and mark the anterior and posterior superior iliac spines (ASIS and PSIS).
Assessment before treatment, then immediately after the intervention, then finally follow up after 2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Mona M ibrahim, Doctorate, Cairo University
  • Study Chair: Enas F youssef, Doctorate, Cairo University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 15, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 15, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 15, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 11, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

January 29, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • local vibration vs MET in SIJD

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction

Clinical Trials on Local Muscle Vibration compared to Muscle energy technique in SIJD

3
Subscribe