Whole Body Vibration Training in Children With Osteogenesis Imperfecta and Limited Mobility

Whole Body Vibration as an Osteogenic Treatment for Children With Osteogenesis Imperfecta With Limited Mobility: A Randomised Controlled Pilot Trial

Children with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) have impaired bone strength, fractures, weak muscles and limited mobility. Mild to moderate forms of OI (type 1 and 4) may benefit from muscle training that leads to secondary improvement in bone strength (osteogenic treatment). Recent studies in children with cerebral palsy but also OI suggest that Whole Body Vibration Training (WBVT) improves mobility and also bone strength. No randomized controlled trials exist in OI children. This randomized controlled pilot study assesses the effect of 5 months WBVT (2 x 9min/day) on muscle function, mobility, bone structure and density. 24 children >5 years with OI type 1 and 4 with limited mobility (CHAQ Score ≥0.13) will be randomized into a WBVT group and a control group matched by gender and pubertal stage. Main outcome measure is the change in tibial volumetric BMD, secondary outcomes include a variety of bone, mobility and dynamic muscle function variables.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a bone fragility disorder with impaired bone strength, fractures, weak muscles and limited mobility. Mild to moderate forms of OI (type 1 and 4) may not require bisphosphonate therapy but would benefit from muscle training that leads to secondary improvement in bone strength (osteogenic treatment). The mechanostat theory states that bone adapts its strength to mechanical forces mostly imposed by muscle. According to this widely accepted theory, any treatment that strengthens muscle should also strengthen bones. Whole body vibration therapy (WBVT) with side-alternating platforms (Galileo™) uses the body's neuromotor reflex system to train muscles. Recent studies in children with cerebral palsy but also OI suggest that WBVT improves mobility and also bone strength. No randomized controlled trials exist in OI children.

This randomized controlled study assesses the effect of 5 months whole body vibration training (2 x 9min/day) on muscle strength, motor function, bone structure and density. 24 children >5 years with OI type 1 and 4 with limited mobility (CHAQ Score ≥0.13) will be randomized into a WBVT group and a control group matched by gender and pubertal stage. Children with OI will be recruited from specialist clinics in Birmingham, Manchester and Sheffield, as well as via advertisement on the Brittle Bone Society's homepage. Patients will be equipped with side-alternating vibration platforms for home use and train with increasing intensity. Outcome measures are tested pre- and post 5-months intervention. Dynamic muscle function is measured by mechanography (jumping force plates) and mobility by CHAQ questionnaire and a six-minute walk test. Changes in bone structure and density are assessed by DXA and peripheral QCT of the tibia.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Birmingham, United Kingdom, B46NH
        • Birmingham Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years to 16 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients with mild OI (type 1 and 4; >5y of age) who need to be at least partly ambulant and have a CHAQ score of greater than 0.13, constituting at least mild disability. Minimum requirement is the ability to rise from a chair.

Informed consent is required from the participant and/or parent/guardian.

-

Exclusion Criteria:

  • On bisphosphonate treatment for less than 2years (since mobility usually improves during the initial phase treatment).
  • Finished bisphosphonate therapy less than 6 months ago
  • Recent lower limb fracture <3months ago, or upper limb fracture which is still in plaster.
  • Heart or lung disease, use of steroids (oral, systemic, topical or inhaled, for more than 3 weeks in the last 12 months) or any other bone-active treatment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Whole Body Vibration
Twice daily WBVT at home using the Galileo M device, 3x3 min, with 3 minute breaks (total daily WBVT 18 min) for 5 months. Children stand upright on the device, with knees bent (10-45 degrees, semi-squat or squat position). A schedule of increasing intensity of vibration exercise was used over time, allowing some adjustment to the patient's physical capability. Amplitude 1 was used for the first 2 weeks, then increased to amplitude 2 and further increased up to amplitude 3, if individually possible, always using frequencies between 20-25Hz. Children also perform exercises on the platform, including shifting their weight from one side to the other, increase/decrease their knee and hip angle, weight shift with trunk rotation, and alternate flexion and extension of knees.
Motorized board producing side-to-side alternating vertical sinusoidal (rotational) vibrations around a fulcrum in the mid-section of the plate. The vibration frequency can be selected by the user who stands on the board with both feet, wearing shoes. The peak-to-peak displacement to which the feet are exposed increases with the distance of the feet from the centre line of the vibrating board. Three positions marked 1, 2 and 3 are indicated on the vibrating board, corresponding to peak-to-peak displacements of 2, 4, and 6mm. The peak acceleration exerted by vibration exercise increases with higher frequencies and higher amplitudes.
Other Names:
  • Vibraflex
No Intervention: Regular Care
Regular Care, including physiotherapy for 5 months

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Does WBVT increase bone density at the distal tibia
Time Frame: 5 months
Trabecular volumetric BMD measured at the distal tibia (4% of tibia length)
5 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Does WBVT result in an increase in dynamic muscle function
Time Frame: 5 months
Jumping Mechanography (single 2-leg jump, multiple one leg hop, chair and heel rise test)
5 months
Does WBVT result in an increase in muscle mass
Time Frame: 5 months
Muscle mass measured by DXA
5 months
Does WBVT result in an increase in density
Time Frame: 5 months
Bone density measured by DXA
5 months
Does WBVT result in an increase in density of the tibia
Time Frame: 5 months
Bone density measured by pQCT
5 months
Does WBVT result in an increase in bone geometry
Time Frame: 5 months
Bone size measured by pQCT
5 months
Does WBVT result in an increase in 6-minute walking distance
Time Frame: 5 months
six minute walk tests
5 months
Does WBVT result in improved disability
Time Frame: 5 months
CHAQ disability score
5 months
Does WBVT result in improved balance
Time Frame: 5 months
Balance (sway area measured by mechanography)
5 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Wolfgang Högler, MD PD, Birmingham Children's Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 17, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 18, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

January 18, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 19, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2017

First Posted (Estimate)

January 24, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 24, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2017

Last Verified

January 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Anonymised data available on request, subject to Ethical and R&D guidelines

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteogenesis Imperfecta

Clinical Trials on Galileo M

Subscribe