Whole-Body 3D T1-weighted MR Imaging Anatomical Sequences: GE mDixon vs FSE (View) Approaches in Prostate Cancer. (TFE-TVE)

Whole-Body 3D T1-weighted MR Imaging Anatomical Sequences: GE mDixon vs FSE (View) Approaches in Prostate Cancer. Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of GE mDixon and FSE, for Bone and Node Staging in Patients With Prostate Cancer.

This study will assess and compare the diagnostic performances and image quality of two WB 3D T1-weighted MR imaging sequences for bone and node staging in patients with prostate cancer : the FSE sequence and a gradient echo (GE) sequence. The latter sequence's main feature is its acquisition time of approximately 1.5 minutes, compared to 18 min for the FSE sequence, reducing the exam's acquisition time, patient discomfort and increasing machine availability.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Whole-body (WB) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has increasingly been used for the screening of bone and soft-tissue metastases in patients with prostate cancer (1). A limitation for its implementation is the 45-60 minutes duration of current WB MRI examinations. Conventional WB MR imaging studies consisted of anatomical two-dimensional (2D) T1-weighted and fat-suppressed fluid-sensitive (proton-density fat-saturated (PDFS) or short-tau inversion-recovery (STIR)) and of a functional diffusion-weighted imaging sequence. Recent research has confirmed the feasibility of replacing the 2D anatomical sequences by a single three-dimensional (3D) T1-weighted fast spin echo (FSE) sequence (2).

This study will assess and compare the diagnostic performances and image quality of two WB 3D T1-weighted MR imaging sequences for bone and node staging in patients with prostate cancer : the FSE sequence and a gradient echo (GE) sequence. The latter sequence's main feature is its acquisition time of approximately 1.5 minutes, compared to 18 min for the FSE sequence, reducing the exam's acquisition time, patient discomfort and increasing machine availability.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of the replacement of the WB 3D T1-weighted FSE MR imaging sequence by the WB 3D T1-weighted GE MR imaging sequence.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Brussels, Belgium, 1200
        • Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • prostate cancer with high risk for metastases

Exclusion Criteria:

  • contraindications to MRI

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
OTHER: Diagnostic performance 3D T1
A 3D T1-weighted GE mDixon MR imaging sequence will be added to the routine 3D T1-weighted FSE sequence. mDixon sub-sequences (Fat and In Phase) are compared to 3D T1-weighted FSE in terms of diagnostic accuracy for M and N staging in prostate cancer patients: Fat, In Phase, Fat+In Phase and the routine 3D T1 will be analyzed separately, blindly and randomly.
Although non-invasive, the prospective addition of a new MRI sequence to a routine MRI protocol is considered by our ethical committee as an "interventional" study.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic performances of 3D GE T1 sub-sequences
Time Frame: 3 months

Sensitivity, sensibility, positive and negative Predictive Values (PV) will be calculated with the results of each reading, and compared.

The physical parameters of the different techniques will also be compared (Signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio, ...).

3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 18, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 17, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2017

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 27, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 10, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2019

Last Verified

May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metastasis

Clinical Trials on Diagnostic performance 3D T1

3
Subscribe