Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation After Total Hip Arthroplasty

Acute Effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Patients Rehabilitation After Total Hip Arthroplasty

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is characterized by the application of an electric pulsed current through electrodes positioned on the skin. It can be an alternative for pain management after surgery for total hip arthroplasty (THA), since it is a safe and cost-effective therapeutic tool, allowing the patient to move early due to pain relief. Therefore, the study aims to evaluate the acute effects of TENS associated with standard physical therapy compared with standard physical therapy on the intensity of pain, hip range of motion and morphine consumption in the rehabilitation of patients after THA.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Pain; Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation
• Intervention / Treatment: Device: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation; Other: Exercises

Detailed Description

The study included patients who underwent THA surgery in the Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA) and met the study eligibility criteria. The sample was randomly divided into experimental group, which received conventional physical therapy associated with the application of TENS, and control group, which held only conventional physical therapy, both on the first day after the surgery. The pain level, the range of motion of the operated hip and the administration of morphine. The experimental group received TENS application held by four self-adhesive electrodes size 5x9cm positioned about five centimeters from the edges of the surgical scar. TENS was applied in conventional mode, emitting a pulsed biphasic, symmetrical rectangular wave with frequency of 100 Hz and pulse duration of 100 µs, for 30 minutes. The intensity was set according to the tolerance of the patient and was gradually increased during the application. The device used was the Neurodyn II model, by Ibramed. Subsequently, the conventional physical therapy was performed. The patients realized active exercises of plantar flexion and dorsal flexion of the ankles, flexion and extension of the knees and adduction and abduction of the hips, in both lower limbs. All exercises were performed with the patient in the supine position in the bed, in one serie of 10 repetitions. Control group received only conventional therapy consisting of the exercises in both lower limbs, identical to those performed in the experimental group.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 30
• Phase: Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 40 years to 90 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• patients who underwent THA surgery due to primary or secondary coxarthrosis; both sexes; age between 40 and 90 years.

Exclusion Criteria:

• patients who refused to participate of the study; THA indication for fractures and bone tumors; THA review surgery; postoperative infection; congenital anatomical alterations; neurological disorders; lack of understanding of commands; sensitivity alterations in the lower limbs; decompensated heart disease or cardiac pacemaker use.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Interventional Model: PARALLEL
• Masking: NONE

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Electrical stimulation; This group received application of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) associated with conventional physical therapy (exercises).	Device: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation; TENS: it was applied in the conventional mode, through four self-adhesive electrodes of size 5x9cm positioned about five centimeters from the edges of the surgical scar, with frequency of 100 Hz and pulse duration of 100μs, for 30 minutes. The intensity was adjusted according to the maximum tolerance of the patient and was it increased during the application time with their permission.; Other Names: TENS; Other: Exercises; Active exercises of plantar flexion and dorsal flexion of the ankles, flexion and extension of the knees and adduction and abduction of the hips, in both lower limbs. All exercises were performed with the patient in the supine position in the bed, in 10 repetitions.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Physical therapy; This group received only conventional physical therapy (exercises).	Other: Exercises; Active exercises of plantar flexion and dorsal flexion of the ankles, flexion and extension of the knees and adduction and abduction of the hips, in both lower limbs. All exercises were performed with the patient in the supine position in the bed, in 10 repetitions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change in Pain Level From Baseline to 45 Minutes	It was measured by Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS), which has scores ranging from zero (which means "no pain") to 10 (which means "worst possible pain"). Two evaluations were performed in each group, before and after the interventions.	baseline, 45 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change in Hip Range of Motion From Baseline to 45 Minutes	Flexion and abduction movements were assessed by goniometry in the hip submitted to the surgery. Two evaluations were performed in each group, before and after the interventions.	baseline, 45 minutes
Number of Participants Who Received Morphine Within 24 Hours	It was evaluated based on the information found in patients' electronic records, considering whether they received morphine during the 24 hours following the interventions or not.	24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: May 1, 2016
• Primary Completion (ACTUAL): August 1, 2016
• Study Completion (ACTUAL): November 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: November 29, 2016
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: February 6, 2017
• First Posted (ESTIMATE): February 8, 2017

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (ACTUAL): November 9, 2017
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: November 6, 2017
• Last Verified: February 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Other Study ID Numbers: 160105

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: UNDECIDED