A Comparative Study for Efficacy and Safety Between 4% Hydroquinone Cream With or Without Fractional Picosecond 1,064 nm Laser for the Treatment of Dermal or Mixed Type Melasma

February 7, 2017 updated by: Thep Chalermchai, Mae Fah Luang University Hospital
A Comparative study for Efficacy and Safety Between 4% hydroquinone cream with or without Fractional Picosecond 1,064 nm Laser for the Treatment of Dermal or Mixed Type Melasma

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Primary Objective:

  • To compare clinical efficacy by Modified MASI score between Fractional Picosecond 1,064 nm laser and daily application of 4% hydroquinone with 4% hydroquinone alone Secondary objectives
  • To compare the clinical endpoints of Mexameter Melanin Index, brownish spot and Ultraviolet spots by VISIATM complexion analysis, The Antera 3D® imaging technology for pigmentation, quality of life by Dermatology Life Quality Index and patient's satisfaction between Fractional Picosecond 1,064 nm laser and 4% hydroquinone with 4% hydroquinone alone

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Phase 2

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female with melasma lesion on bilateral sides
  • Age between 18-65 years
  • Dermal or mixed type melasma, confirming by Wood's lamp test
  • Willing to participant in this study and signed in informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy / lactation
  • Having an activity or working outside the building or unable to avoid heavy UV light
  • Allergic to UV sunscreen, topical anesthetics , topical corticosteroid or hydroquinone Treatment with laser or chemical peeling within 3 months
  • Treatment with Skin Lighting medication / food supplements within 4 weeks
  • Currently use of topical retinoid, hydroquinone or corticosteroid within 4 weeks
  • Use of whitening cream such as alpha arbutin, azelaic acid, kojic acid ascorbic acid or any cosmetics within 2 weeks
  • Uncontrolled medical illness include non-skin cancers, coagulopathy
  • Intra-cardiac device - pacemaker
  • Photosentive conditions such as diabetes, thyroid disease, liver and kidney disease and photosensitive dermatosis
  • Currently taking anticoagulant such as warfarin
  • Active skin infection or acute dermatitis at testes skin sites
  • Unable to follow and comply to the study protocol

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Fractional Picosecond 1,064 nm laser and 4% hydroquinone cream
Fractional Picosecond 1,064 nm laser and daily application with 4% hydroquinone cream
Active Comparator: 4% hydroquinone cream alone

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Modified MASI score
Time Frame: The mean change from the baseline to week-12 visit
The mean change from the baseline to week-12 visit
Proportion of subjects with at least 50% MASI score improvement
Time Frame: from baseline to 12-week visit
from baseline to 12-week visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Mexameter Melanin index
Time Frame: baseline, week 4, week 8 and week 12
baseline, week 4, week 8 and week 12
Global satisfaction score by Quartile rating scale
Time Frame: week 4, week 8 and week 12
week 4, week 8 and week 12
Quality of life by DLQI
Time Frame: at week 12
at week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 3, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2017

First Posted (Estimate)

February 9, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 9, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2017

Last Verified

February 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Melasma

Clinical Trials on Fractional Picosecond 1,064 nm laser

Subscribe