Non Ablative Fractional Laser Treatment of Burn Scars

December 12, 2013 updated by: Elisabeth Taudorf, Bispebjerg Hospital

LONG-TERM AND CONTINUED IMPROVEMENT OF MATURE BURN SCARS IN RESPONSE TO NONABLATIVE FRACTIONAL LASER - A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL WITH HISTOLOGICAL EVALUATION

BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence appears for non-ablative fractional laser (NAFL) to remodel mature burn scars.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate long-term clinical and histological appearance of mature burn scars after NAFL-treatment.

HYPOTHESIS: That NAFL can modulate mature burn scars with subsequently improved cosmetic and functional appearance.

METHODS: Study patients with burn scars at trunk or extremities. Side-by-side test areas are randomized to three monthly 1,540 nm NAFL-treatments or control, followed by blinded evaluations at 1, 3, and 6 months using mPOSAS (modified Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale; 1 = normal skin, 10 = worst imaginable scar).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Copenhagen
      • Copenhagen NV, Copenhagen, Denmark, DK-2400
        • Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • legally competent adults aged 18-60 years
  • Fitzpatrick skin type I-III
  • burn scar 1 year or older
  • total scar area allowing selection of two similar side-by-side test areas of minimum 1.5 × 3 cm for study purpose

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy or lactation
  • suntan
  • wounds or infections in study area
  • tendency to form hypertrophic scars or keloids
  • oral retinoids, anti-inflammatory or immunosuppressive drugs within the last six months
  • current anticoagulants
  • previous treatments in test area with laser, Intense Pulsed Light, dermabrasion, chemical peel or filler.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Control
One area assessed as a control area, compared to the laser-treated area
3 treatments with 4-6 weeks interval
Other Names:
  • non-ablative fractional er:glass laser
  • 1,540 nm laser treatment
Active Comparator: Non-ablative Laser treatment
3 Non-ablative fractional laser treatments of one area
observation, comparison to laser-treated area
Other Names:
  • observation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in overall Scar-appearance
Time Frame: 1,3 and 6 months follow-up
Primary endpoint is change in overall scar-appearance assessed by a slightly modified Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (evaluation of study area omitted since this is fixed as part of study procedure). Scale: 1= normal skin; 10= worst imaginable scar.
1,3 and 6 months follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
specific clinical and histological scar appearance
Time Frame: 1, 3, and 6 months follow-up

Additional assessments include:

  • evaluation of vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability (evaluated on modified Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale)
  • histological changes (Small safety issue from taking a 4 mm cutaneous punch biopsy)
  • patient satisfaction
  • adverse events (pain during treatment, immediate treatment reaction, 24h treatment reaction, evaluation of side effects at 6 months follow-up)
1, 3, and 6 months follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Merete Hædersdal, MD,PhD,DmSc, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 12, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

December 18, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 18, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2013

Last Verified

December 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Burn Scars

Clinical Trials on non-ablative fractional laser

3
Subscribe