Custom Pack in Spine Surgery (kit)

August 8, 2018 updated by: Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

Surgical Field Custom Pack's Efficacy on Soft Tissue Dissecting Time Reduction, on Relative Risks and Materials Wasted, in Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery: Randomized Controlled Trial

Recent evidence suggests the efficacy of "custom pack" procedure on the operators reduction time and on the contamination risk due to the opening of many sterile packs. Nevertheless ,the studies available are sponsored by the industry and their results are very few. The aim of this study is to evaluate the correlation and reliability of spine surgery "custom pack" efficacy in adult patients obtained in the reduction of surgery time, relative risks, and materials wasted compared with the standard surgical field procedure practice .

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

37

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bologna, Italy, 40136
        • Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Degenerative spinal disease from 2 to 4 levels,
  • Oncologic spine disease with only decompression and stabilization.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Revision surgeries,
  • Minimally invasive interventions,
  • Interventions that provide a dual access, and
  • Patients who refuse consent to experimentation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: custom pack
Preparation of the surgical field using a custom pack. The use of a custom pack provides much of the material provided for the preparation of the surgical field with a single opening of the package , reducing the risk of contamination of the material.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: standard care
The scrub nurse prepares the surgical field opening all the sterile packs it deems necessary for the surgery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Soft Tissue Dissecting Time
Time Frame: up to the first day post intervention
minutes from the start of the dissection to complete bone cleaning
up to the first day post intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Surgery Time
Time Frame: up to the first day post intervention
from the incision to the patient's sutures (minutes)
up to the first day post intervention
Postoperative Complications
Time Frame: up to 2 weeks
number of early wound infection
up to 2 weeks
Numbers of Materials Wasted
Time Frame: up to the first day post intervention
amount of open sterile materials not used
up to the first day post intervention
Blood Loss
Time Frame: up to 2 weeks
Levels of hemoglobin and hematocrit intraoperative (gas analysis before and after surgery) compared to hemoglobin and hematocrit before surgery and number of blood transfusions both intra- and postoperative.
up to 2 weeks
Pain (Score on the "Numeric Rating Scale")
Time Frame: up to the first 3 days post intervention
Pain Score on the "Numeric Rating Scale". The scale had values from 0 to 10 where zero represented no pain and 10 the worst possible pain.
up to the first 3 days post intervention
Length of Stay
Time Frame: up to 2 weeks
number of days spent in hospital
up to 2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Annamaria Nicolini, RN, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

September 2, 2015

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 16, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

July 30, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 1, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

February 10, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 28, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2018

Last Verified

February 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bone Diseases

Clinical Trials on custom pack

3
Subscribe