Haloperidol Versus Ondansetron for Cannabis Hyperemesis Syndrome (HaVOC) (HaVOC)

April 2, 2024 updated by: Dr. Marco L.A. Sivilotti

Haloperidol Versus Ondansetron for Cannabis Hyperemesis Syndrome (HaVOC): A Randomized Controlled Trial

Cannabis Hyperemesis Syndrome (CHS) has become a well-documented syndrome since 2004 and is expected to increase in prevalence with continuing liberalization of marijuana and recognition of the disease. Regardless of whether the association with heavy cannabis use is recognized, there is well-documented resistance to traditional anti-emetic treatment. Given promising reports of the use of intravenous haloperidol, a randomized controlled trial comparing it to the commonly administered anti-emetic ondansetron will contribute to the management of CHS

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a double-blinded, randomized, cross-over clinical trial that will enroll approximately 80 subjects from at least four different research sites. Patients who have been diagnosed with CHS and enrolled in our study will act as their own controls upon their return to the ED for a subsequent bout of CHS for up to 3 visits per subject. Each patient will be allocated in a 1:1:1 fashion into one of three treatment groups: high- or low-dose haloperidol, or ondansetron, with a minimum 7-day washout period between treatments. As CHS tends to be a recurrent syndrome (presumably given the continued use of cannabis despite recommendations to taper and abstain), it is expected that most subjects will return at least once again, and a substantial subset of the study population will complete all three treatment visits during the trial.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

33

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Kingston, Ontario, Canada, K7L 2V7
        • Kingston General Hospital
      • Kingston, Ontario, Canada, K7L 3N6
        • Queen's University
      • Kingston, Ontario, Canada, K7L 2V7
        • Hotel Dieu Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age > 18 years
  2. Self-report of ≥3 episodes of emesis occurring in a cyclic pattern for greater than 1 month in the preceding 2 years
  3. Current episode >2 hours of emesis
  4. At least one episode of emesis/forceful retching witnessed (including products of emesis at bedside) or heard by an independent observer (healthcare provider or family/friend) in the emergency department
  5. Self-reported frequent (near daily to daily x at least 6 months) use of cannabis by inhalation.
  6. Working diagnosis of cannabis hyperemesis syndrome in the opinion of the treating emergency physician

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Chronic, daily use of opioid equivalent to ≥10mg morphine/day
  2. Inability to comprehend study consent or instructions
  3. Unreliable follow-up/unlikely to return for cross-over
  4. Administration of an intravenous antiemetic, anticholinergic or antipsychotic (other than up to 100mg dimenhydrinate) in the previous 24 hours
  5. Allergy or intolerance to haloperidol or ondansetron
  6. Pregnancy
  7. Any other medical or psychiatric condition that in the opinion of the enrolling physician would interfere with participation in the trial
  8. Current active participation in an investigational drug trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Ondansetron 8mg
8mg Ondansetron prepared in a 100mL normal saline mini-bag
Ondansetron 8 MG prepared in a 100 mL normal saline min-bag
Other Names:
  • Zofran
Experimental: Haloperidol 0.05mg/kg
0.05mg/kg of Haloperidol prepared in a 100mL normal saline mini-bag
Haloperidol 0.05 mg/kg prepared in a 100 mL normal saline min-bag
Other Names:
  • Haldol
Experimental: Haloperidol 0.1mg/kg
0.1mg/kg of Haloperidol prepared in a 100mL normal saline mini-bag
Haloperidol 0.1 mg/kg prepared in a 100 mL normal saline min-bag
Other Names:
  • Haldol

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in pain and nausea
Time Frame: 2 hours
Difference between arithmetic mean of Pain Score and Nausea Score (each on a 10-cm VAS) at 2 hours versus at baseline
2 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in pain
Time Frame: 1, 2, 24 and 48 hours
Changes in abdominal pain score at 1, 2, 24 and 48 hours vs. baseline
1, 2, 24 and 48 hours
Change in nausea
Time Frame: 1, 2, 24 and 48 hours
Changes in nausea score at 1, 2, 24 and 48 hours vs. baseline
1, 2, 24 and 48 hours
Treatment success
Time Frame: 2, 24 and 48 hours
Treatment success = both abdominal pain and nausea score < 2 at 2, 24 and 48 hours
2, 24 and 48 hours
Oral intake
Time Frame: 2 hours
Cumulative oral intake from t=0 to 2 hours (in mL)
2 hours
Emesis volume
Time Frame: 2 hours
Cumulative emesis from t=0 to 2 hours (in mL)
2 hours
Urine output
Time Frame: 2 hours
Cumulative urine output (in mL)
2 hours
Discharge ready at 2 hours
Time Frame: 2 hours
Deemed discharge-ready at 2 hours in the opinion of the treating physician
2 hours
Rescue anti-emetics in ED
Time Frame: at discharge from Emergency Department or 12 hours whichever comes first
Given rescue anti-emetics prior to discharge
at discharge from Emergency Department or 12 hours whichever comes first
Time to discharge from ED
Time Frame: at discharge from Emergency Department or 12 hours whichever comes first
Time interval to discharge-ready from t=0 (min)
at discharge from Emergency Department or 12 hours whichever comes first
Subject preferred arm
Time Frame: 2 hours
Subject preference of high- vs low-dose haloperidol, and of haloperidol vs ondansetron (-10, 10)
2 hours
Return to ED
Time Frame: 7 days
Unscheduled return visits to ED within 7 days (count)
7 days
ED consult
Time Frame: From time of study intervention until admitting service consulted or subject discharged from Emergency Department, whichever comes first, assessed up to 48 hours
Consulted to admitting service
From time of study intervention until admitting service consulted or subject discharged from Emergency Department, whichever comes first, assessed up to 48 hours
Prolonged ED Length of stay
Time Frame: at discharge from Emergency Department or 12 hours whichever comes first
Outcome 10 "Time to Discharge from ED" > 12 hours (binary yes/no)
at discharge from Emergency Department or 12 hours whichever comes first

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marco LA Sivilotti, MD, MSc, Dept. of Emergency Medicine, Queen's University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 21, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

July 7, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 23, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

February 17, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 3, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cannabis Use Disorder

Clinical Trials on Ondansetron 8mg

Subscribe