- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03809234
Pgp Transporter and CNS Biodistribution of Ondansetron in Healthy Volunteers
Effects of Pgp Transporter Inhibition on CNS Biodistribution of Ondansetron in Healthy Volunteers
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The study hypothesis is that inhibition of Pgp efflux transporters will increase the CNS bio-distribution of the 5-HT3R antagonist ondansetron.
Specifically:
- Intravenous administration of ondansetron is expected to yield low CSF exposure.
- Co-administration of ondansetron with intravenous tariquidar, an inhibitor of Pgp efflux transporters, will result in increased CSF exposure of ondansetron.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Missouri
-
Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
- Washington University in St. Louis
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18-50;
- Body mass index between 18.5 and 30;
- Good general health with no remarkable medical conditions;
- Able and willing to provide informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Current pregnancy or lactation;
- Known history of hepatic, renal, or cardiac disease, including Long QT Syndrome, cardiac arrhythmias or QTc interval >450msec;
- Known hypertension, endocrine disorders (such as diabetes mellitus), chronic pain, hematologic disorders, or psychiatric conditions requiring medications;
Abnormal vital signs at screening visit, including:
- HR <40 or >100
- SBP < 90mmHg or >150mmHg
- DBP > 100mmHg
- Abnormal troponin values at screening visit
- Abnormal complete blood count (CBC) or comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP) values at screening visit that could affect drug pharmacokinetics, or suggest undiagnosed medical condition which would increase the risk of complications resulting from this study.
- Any contraindication for ondansetron administration;
- Peri- or post-menopausal women experiencing symptoms such as hot flashes;
- Contraindication to intrathecal catheter placement, such as known coagulopathy or history of clotting disorders, history of scoliosis or lumbar fusion, current infection or fever;
- Ongoing use of any of the following medications with known effects on Pgp function: carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, cyclosporine, clarithromycin, erythromycin, ritonavir, verapamil, rifampicin, St. John's wort;
Current treatment (or treatment within < 5 half-lives) with any medication, including QT-prolonging drugs and drugs known to have a significant interaction with ondansetron or P-gp substrates (see below:)
- Antiretrovirals of Protease inhibitor (e.g. Ritonavir, Saquinavir) or Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (e.g. Efavirenz, Zidovudine) family.
- Phenytoin, Carbamazepine, Oxcarbazepine, Rifampin
- Amiodarone
- Azole antifungals (e.g. Itraconazole, Fluconazole)
- Macrolide antibiotics (Erythromycin, Clarithromycin)
- Cimetidine
- Non-DHP calcium channel blockers Verapamil and Diltiazem
- First generation antipsychotic medications Thioridazine, Haloperidol, Chlorpromazine, and Pimozide
- Second generation antipsychotic medications Ziprasidone and Quetiapine
- Antihistamine Terfenadine
- Antidepressants Trazodone, Bupropion, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, Mirtazapine
- Antiarrhythmics Propafenone, Flecainide, and Procainamide
- Fluoroquinolone antibiotics Norfloxacin, Ofloxacin, and Ciprofloxacin
- Cisapride
- Fentanyl, Lithium, Tramadol
- Intravenous Methylene blue
- Other strong inhibitors or inducers of Cytochromes P450 2D6 or 3A4.
- Other strong inhibitors or inducers of P-glycoprotein
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Ondansetron with Tariquidar
The participants will receive an IV ondansetron infusion with tariquidar.
Participants will receive either 8mg or 16 mg of iv ondansetron, with 4mg/kg tariguidar.
|
Each participant will receive two IV infusions of ondansetron, 24 hours apart.
In the first and second sessions, respectively, placebo (D5W) or tariquidar (4mg/kg dose in D5W) 22 will be administered IV over 60 minutes.
Ondansetron will be diluted in 50mL 0.9% normal saline, and tariquidar will be diluted in 250mL D5W.
Each participant will receive two IV infusions of ondansetron, 24 hours apart.
In the first and second sessions, respectively, placebo (D5W) or tariquidar (4mg/kg dose in D5W) 22 will be administered IV over 60 minutes.
Ondansetron will be diluted in 50mL 0.9% normal saline, and tariquidar will be diluted in 250mL D5W.
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Ondansetron with Placebo
The participants will receive an IV ondansetron infusion with D5W as placebo.
Participants will receive either 8mg or 16 mg of iv ondansetron.
|
Each participant will receive two IV infusions of ondansetron, 24 hours apart.
In the first and second sessions, respectively, placebo (D5W) or tariquidar (4mg/kg dose in D5W) 22 will be administered IV over 60 minutes.
Ondansetron will be diluted in 50mL 0.9% normal saline, and tariquidar will be diluted in 250mL D5W.
Each participant will receive two IV infusions of ondansetron, 24 hours apart.
In the first and second sessions, respectively, placebo (D5W) or tariquidar (4mg/kg dose in D5W) 22 will be administered IV over 60 minutes.
Ondansetron will be diluted in 50mL 0.9% normal saline, and tariquidar will be diluted in 250mL D5W.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
CSF penetration of ondansetron with and without tariquidar - area under the curve (AUC)
Time Frame: 48 hours
|
CSF penetration of intravenous ondansetron will be determined as AUCCSF0-∞ of ondansetron, and compared between the two sessions, with and without tariquidar
|
48 hours
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Cmax CSF
Time Frame: 48 hours
|
Maximum CSF concentration (Cmax CSF) of ondansetron, compared between the sessions
|
48 hours
|
|
CSF:plasma concentration ratio
Time Frame: 48 hours
|
CSF:plasma concentration ratio of ondansetron, compared between the two sessions
|
48 hours
|
|
Plasma Cmax
Time Frame: 48 hours
|
Maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of ondansetron, compared between the sessions
|
48 hours
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Evaluation of analgesic effect of ondansetron in an experimental heat pain model
Time Frame: 48 hours
|
Comparison of analgesic effect of ondansetron in an experimental heat pain model: HPTT (as Δ°C from baseline) will be compared between the sessions at 30 min and 50 min after ondansetron infusion completion
|
48 hours
|
|
Assessment of analgesic effect of ondansetron in an experimental cold pain model
Time Frame: 48 hours
|
Comparison of analgesic effect of ondansetron in an experimental cold pain model duration of tolerance and pain rating after 120 second (or maximum tolerable) hand submersion in 3-5°C water will be compared between the sessions at 40 minutes.
|
48 hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Simon Haroutounian, PhD, Washington University School of Medicine
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Smith BH, Torrance N. Epidemiology of neuropathic pain and its impact on quality of life. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2012 Jun;16(3):191-8. doi: 10.1007/s11916-012-0256-0.
- Finnerup NB, Attal N, Haroutounian S, McNicol E, Baron R, Dworkin RH, Gilron I, Haanpaa M, Hansson P, Jensen TS, Kamerman PR, Lund K, Moore A, Raja SN, Rice AS, Rowbotham M, Sena E, Siddall P, Smith BH, Wallace M. Pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2015 Feb;14(2):162-73. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70251-0. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
- Yawn BP, Wollan PC, Weingarten TN, Watson JC, Hooten WM, Melton LJ 3rd. The prevalence of neuropathic pain: clinical evaluation compared with screening tools in a community population. Pain Med. 2009 Apr;10(3):586-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00588.x. Epub 2009 Mar 17. Erratum In: Pain Med. 2011 Aug;12(8):1294.
- Dogrul A, Ossipov MH, Porreca F. Differential mediation of descending pain facilitation and inhibition by spinal 5HT-3 and 5HT-7 receptors. Brain Res. 2009 Jul 14;1280:52-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.001. Epub 2009 May 8.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Nervous System Diseases
- Pain
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Neuromuscular Diseases
- Peripheral Nervous System Diseases
- Neuralgia
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Central Nervous System Depressants
- Autonomic Agents
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Antiemetics
- Gastrointestinal Agents
- Dermatologic Agents
- Antipsychotic Agents
- Tranquilizing Agents
- Psychotropic Drugs
- Serotonin Agents
- Serotonin Antagonists
- Anti-Anxiety Agents
- Antipruritics
- Ondansetron
Other Study ID Numbers
- 201811167
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Neuropathic Pain
-
Unity Health TorontoRecruitingChronic Neuropathic PainCanada
-
University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandFondation ApicilCompletedNeuropathic Traumatic Pain | Pain NRS ≥ 4 | Peripheral Neuropathic Pain | Neuropathic Pain Diagnostic Questionnaire (DN4) ≥ 4France
-
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de ChileNot yet recruiting
-
Poitiers University HospitalRecruitingChronic Neuropathic PainFrance
-
Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris...CompletedPostherpetic Neuralgia (PHN) | Chemotherapy Induced Neuropathic Pain | Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain (DPN) | HIV-related Neuropathic Pain (HIV)Colombia, Mexico, Ecuador, Peru, Venezuela
-
Eli Lilly and CompanyRecruitingDiabetic Peripheral Neuropathic PainUnited States, Puerto Rico
-
Shandong Suncadia Medicine Co., Ltd.RecruitingDiabetic Peripheral Neuropathic PainChina
-
Shanghai Yidian Pharmaceutical Technology Development...Not yet recruitingDiabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain
-
Ente Ospedaliero Ospedali GallieraCompletedNeuropathic Pain in CancerItaly
-
University Hospital, Strasbourg, FranceTerminatedPostthoracotomy Pain | Postthoracoscopy Neuropathic PainFrance
Clinical Trials on Ondansetron 8mg with Saline & Tariquidar
-
Washington University School of MedicineCompleted
-
Suez Canal UniversityEnrolling by invitation
-
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernRecruitingAge-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)Switzerland
-
Muhammad MubarizNot yet recruiting
-
Aretaieion University HospitalUniversity of AthensRecruiting
-
Wayne State UniversityRecruitingPruritus Caused by DrugUnited States
-
Mayo ClinicNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)RecruitingDiabetes Mellitus | IndigestionUnited States
-
Minia UniversityFaculty of Medicine, Minia UniversityCompletedPostoperative Nausea and Vomiting | Obstetric Anesthesia Problems | Postdural Puncture HeadacheEgypt
-
University of ArizonaUniversity of Colorado, DenverUnknown