- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03058263
Effect of Neostigmine on the Recovery of Rocuronium: A Comparison Between Partial and TOF Ratio-Based Dose
August 15, 2017 updated by: Arif H. M. Marsaban, Indonesia University
The Effectiveness of Neostigmine on the Recovery of Rocuronium-Induced Neuromuscular Blockade: A Comparison Between Partial Dose and TOF Ratio-Based Adjustment Dose
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of Neostigmine partial dose towards neuromuscular blockade of rocuronium
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Approval from Ethical Committee of Faculty of Medicine University of Indonesia was acquired prior conducting the study.
Subjects were given informed consent before enrolling the study and randomized into two groups.
Intravenous (IV) cannula with Ringer Lactate fluid, non-invasive blood pressure monitor, electrocardiogram (ECG) and pulse-oxymetry were set on the subjects in the operation room.
After preoxygenation was given with 100% oxygen, general anesthesia induction was done with midazolam 0.01-0.02
mg/kg, fentanyl 3 mcg/kg, propofol 1-2 mg/kg, and rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg.
Following induction, endotracheal intubation or laryngeal mask insertion was performed.
Maintenance was done by sevoflurane 1.2 vol%, and fentanyl 1.2 mcg/kg.
After the surgery had finished, fentanyl drip was stopped.
Subjects were then observed until spontaneous breaths occured adequately (tidal volume ≥ 5 ml/kg) before train of four (TOF) ratio was evaluated using acceleromyography (AMG).
Before reversal (neostigmine) was given, anesthetic gas was stopped and duration of operation as well as post-operative TOF ratio was recorded.
The time since reversal was given then recorded.
Group A received neostigmine partial dose (0.02 mg) in combination with atropine 0.4 mg for every milligram of neostigmine.
Group B received TOF ratio-based dose of neostigmine in combination with atropine 0.4 mg for every milligram of neostigmine.
After administration of neostigmine, TOF ratio was measured every 5 minutes until TOF ratio of ≥ 90% was achieved, and finally definitive airway could be removed.
For Group A, another partial dose of neostigmine was given after 10 minutes from the first reversal dose if the TOF ratio of ≥90% had not been reached.
For Group B, another TOF ratio-based dose of neostigmine was given after 10 minutes from the first reversal dose if the TOF ratio of ≥90% had not been reached.
Subjects were then transported to recovery room.
Data was analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), for numerical data using unpaired T-test or Mann-Whitney-U test, for categorical data using Chi-square test or Fischer Exact's Test.
Data normality was tested by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.
Significant value is p<0.05.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
66
Phase
- Phase 2
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
DKI Jakarta
-
Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia, 10430
- Cipto Mangunkusumo Cental National Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 60 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients aged 18-60 years old
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II who were planned to undergo any elective surgery at operating room in general anesthesia
- subjects had been explained about the study, and agreed to enroll and have signed the informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria:
- BMI ≥ 30
- had any severe kidney or liver disease
- had neuromuscular disease or asthma
Drop out Criteria:
- Duration of operation less than one hour or more than 2 hours
- during surgery received maintenance dose of neuromuscular block
- intraoperative cardiac arrest was occurred
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: partial dose of neostigmine
Those who received partial dose of neostigmine as rocuronium reversal
|
Subjects were given partial dose of neostigmine as rocuronium reversal after the surgery had finished; subjects were given TOF ratio-based dose of neostigmine after the surgery had finished
Other Names:
|
Experimental: TOF ratio-based dose of neostigmine
Those who received TOF ratio-based dose of neostigmine as rocuronium reversal
|
Subjects were given partial dose of neostigmine as rocuronium reversal after the surgery had finished; subjects were given TOF ratio-based dose of neostigmine after the surgery had finished
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
TOF ratio with partial dose of neostigmine
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Train-of-Four ratio obtained from post-operative acceleromyography after the first partial dose of neostigmine had been administrated until definitive airway device can be removed
|
Day 1
|
TOF ratio with TOF ratio-based dose of neostigmine
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Day 1
|
|
TOF ratio between partial dose of neostigmine and TOF ratio-based dose of neostigmine
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Day 1
|
|
time needed to reach TOF ratio ≥ 90% in group with partial dose of neostigmine
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Day 1
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Arif HM Marsaban, Consultant, Indonesia University
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Brull SJ, Murphy GS. Residual neuromuscular block: lessons unlearned. Part II: methods to reduce the risk of residual weakness. Anesth Analg. 2010 Jul;111(1):129-40. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181da8312. Epub 2010 May 4. Erratum In: Anesth Analg. 2012 Feb;114(2):390.
- Maybauer DM, Geldner G, Blobner M, Puhringer F, Hofmockel R, Rex C, Wulf HF, Eberhart L, Arndt C, Eikermann M. Incidence and duration of residual paralysis at the end of surgery after multiple administrations of cisatracurium and rocuronium. Anaesthesia. 2007 Jan;62(1):12-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04862.x.
- Murphy GS, Brull SJ. Residual neuromuscular block: lessons unlearned. Part I: definitions, incidence, and adverse physiologic effects of residual neuromuscular block. Anesth Analg. 2010 Jul;111(1):120-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181da832d. Epub 2010 May 4.
- Thilen SR, Hansen BE, Ramaiah R, Kent CD, Treggiari MM, Bhananker SM. Intraoperative neuromuscular monitoring site and residual paralysis. Anesthesiology. 2012 Nov;117(5):964-72. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31826f8fdd.
- Donati F. Residual paralysis: a real problem or did we invent a new disease? Can J Anaesth. 2013 Jul;60(7):714-29. doi: 10.1007/s12630-013-9932-8. Epub 2013 Apr 27.
- Debaene B, Plaud B, Dilly MP, Donati F. Residual paralysis in the PACU after a single intubating dose of nondepolarizing muscle relaxant with an intermediate duration of action. Anesthesiology. 2003 May;98(5):1042-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200305000-00004.
- Naguib M, Kopman AF, Ensor JE. Neuromuscular monitoring and postoperative residual curarisation: a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2007 Mar;98(3):302-16. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael386.
- Song IA, Seo KS, Oh AY, No HJ, Hwang JW, Jeon YT, Park SH, Do SH. Timing of reversal with respect to three nerve stimulator end-points from cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular block. Anaesthesia. 2015 Jul;70(7):797-802. doi: 10.1111/anae.13044. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
- Sundman E, Witt H, Olsson R, Ekberg O, Kuylenstierna R, Eriksson LI. The incidence and mechanisms of pharyngeal and upper esophageal dysfunction in partially paralyzed humans: pharyngeal videoradiography and simultaneous manometry after atracurium. Anesthesiology. 2000 Apr;92(4):977-84. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200004000-00014.
- Viby-Mogensen J. Postoperative residual curarization and evidence-based anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2000 Mar;84(3):301-3. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013428. No abstract available.
- American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Postanesthetic Care. Practice guidelines for postanesthetic care: a report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Postanesthetic Care. Anesthesiology. 2002 Mar;96(3):742-52. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200203000-00033. No abstract available.
- Naguib M, Kopman AF, Lien CA, Hunter JM, Lopez A, Brull SJ. A survey of current management of neuromuscular block in the United States and Europe. Anesth Analg. 2010 Jul;111(1):110-9. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181c07428. Epub 2009 Nov 12.
- Naguib M, Samarkandi AH, Bakhamees HS, Magboul MA, el-Bakry AK. Histamine-release haemodynamic changes produced by rocuronium, vecuronium, mivacurium, atracurium and tubocurarine. Br J Anaesth. 1995 Nov;75(5):588-92. doi: 10.1093/bja/75.5.588.
- Whalley DG, Maurer WG, Knapik AL, Estafanous FG. Comparison of neuromuscular effects, efficacy and safety of rocuronium and atracurium in ambulatory anaesthesia. Can J Anaesth. 1998 Oct;45(10):954-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03012303.
- Grayling M, Sweeney BP. Recovery from neuromuscular blockade: a survey of practice. Anaesthesia. 2007 Aug;62(8):806-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05101.x.
- Kopman AF. Managing neuromuscular block: where are the guidelines? Anesth Analg. 2010 Jul;111(1):9-10. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181cdb0a5. No abstract available.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
October 1, 2016
Primary Completion (Actual)
February 1, 2017
Study Completion (Actual)
February 28, 2017
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 12, 2017
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 15, 2017
First Posted (Actual)
February 20, 2017
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 18, 2017
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 15, 2017
Last Verified
August 1, 2017
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Nervous System Diseases
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Neuromuscular Manifestations
- Muscle Hypotonia
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Autonomic Agents
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Cholinergic Agents
- Enzyme Inhibitors
- Cholinesterase Inhibitors
- Parasympathomimetics
- Neostigmine
Other Study ID Numbers
- IndonesiaUAnes011
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Undecided
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on General Anesthesia
-
Universidad de AntioquiaCompletedAnesthesia, General | Anesthesia, IntravenousColombia
-
Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaErasmus Medical Center; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Children... and other collaboratorsCompletedPediatric Anesthesia | General Anesthesia | ElectroencephalographyUnited States, Australia, Switzerland, China, Netherlands
-
University Hospital, SaarlandCompletedGeneral Anesthesia | Regional Anesthesia | Immune FunctionGermany
-
Jagiellonian UniversityRecruitingAnesthesia, General | Analgesics, Opioid | Anesthesia, EndotrachealPoland
-
Antalya Training and Research HospitalCompletedAnesthesia, General | Anesthesia, Spinal | Umbilical CordTurkey
-
Tanta UniversityRecruitingSpinal Anesthesia | General Anesthesia | Inguinal Herniorrhaphy | NeonatesEgypt
-
Nordic Pharma SASCompletedSpinal Anesthesia | Outpatient Surgery | Short General AnesthesiaFrance
-
Samsung Medical CenterUnknownGeneral Anesthesia | Total Intravenous Anesthesia | Bispectral Index MonitoringKorea, Republic of
-
Armed Forces Hospital, PakistanCompletedGeneral Anesthesia | Epidural AnesthesiaPakistan
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonCompletedGeneral Anesthesia | Intravenous AnesthesiaUnited States
Clinical Trials on Dose of Neostigmine
-
Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao PauloNot yet recruitingNeuromuscular Blockade | Neuromuscular Blockade, ResidualBrazil
-
University Hospital, AntwerpCompletedMuscle Weakness | Muscle Fatigue | Diaphragmatic DysfunctionBelgium
-
NorthShore University HealthSystemCompleted
-
Korea University Ansan HospitalNot yet recruitingCOVID-19 | General Anesthesia
-
Onze Lieve Vrouw HospitalCompletedRespiratory Muscles | ElectromyographyBelgium
-
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCCompleted
-
Konkuk University Medical CenterNot yet recruitingStrabismus | Emergence Delirium | Pediatric ALL
-
Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao PauloNot yet recruitingNeuromuscular Blockade | Neuromuscular Block, Residual | Neuromuscular Block Prolonged
-
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC)Completed
-
Alexandria UniversityKasr El Aini Hospital; Fayoum UniversityCompletedPost-Dural Puncture HeadacheEgypt