CiPA Phase 1 ECG Biomarker Validation Study

Comprehensive in Vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) Clinical Phase 1 ECG Biomarker Validation Study (CiPA Phase 1 ECG Biomarker Study)

This study will assess whether exposure response analysis of the electrocardiographic QTc and J-Tpeakc intervals in Phase 1 clinical pharmacology studies can be used to confirm that drugs that predominantly block the potassium channel encoded by the human ether-à-go-go-related gene (hERG) with approximately equipotent late sodium and/or calcium block ("balanced ion channel" drugs) do not cause J-Tpeakc prolongation and that drugs that predominantly block hERG without late sodium or L-type calcium current block ("predominant hERG" drugs) cause QTc prolongation.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Pharmacokinetics; Pharmacodynamics; Drug-induced QT Prolongation
• Intervention / Treatment: Drug: Ranolazine; Drug: Verapamil; Drug: Lopinavir / Ritonavir; Drug: Chloroquine; Drug: Placebo; Drug: Dofetilide and Diltiazem

Detailed Description

This study will assess whether exposure response analysis of the electrocardiographic QTc and J-Tpeakc intervals in Phase 1 clinical pharmacology studies can be used to confirm that "balanced ion channel" drugs do not cause J-Tpeakc prolongation and that "predominant hERG" drugs cause QTc prolongation. This clinical study consists of 2 parts: a 50-subject parallel part (Part 1) and a 10-subject crossover part (Part 2). Up to 74 healthy subjects will be enrolled (including 14 potential replacement subjects).

Part 1 will be a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 1 period parallel design to assess the effect of 4 marketed drugs and 1 placebo on the QTc and J-Tpeakc intervals in 50 healthy subjects. A parallel design similar to a single or multiple ascending dose (SAD/MAD) Phase 1 study will be used that will result in each study drug being administered to 10 subjects, and placebo to 10 subjects, in 1 period of 3 consecutive days to achieve low and high drug exposure.

Part 2 will be a double-blind, randomized, 2-period crossover design to assess the effect of hERG block (dofetilide) versus calcium block (diltiazem) on the QTc and J-Tpeakc intervals in 10 healthy subjects on Days 1, 2, and 3 (Period 1) and Days 8, 9, and 10 (Period 2).

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 60
• Phase: Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Wisconsin
    • West Bend, Wisconsin, United States, 53095
      • Spaulding Clinical Research

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 14 years to 46 years (Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

1. Subject signs an institutional review board (IRB) approved written informed consent and privacy language as per national regulations (e.g., Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act [HIPAA] authorization) before any study related procedures are performed.
2. Subject is a healthy man or woman, 18 to 50 years of age, inclusive, who weighs at least 50 kg (110 pounds) and has a body mass index of 18 to 30 kg/m2, inclusive, at Screening.
3. Subject has normal medical history findings, clinical laboratory results, vital sign measurements, 12 lead ECG results, and physical examination findings at Screening or, if abnormal, the abnormality is not considered clinically significant (as determined and documented by the investigator or designee).
4. Female subjects will be at least 2 years postmenopausal, surgically sterile, or practicing 2 highly effective methods of birth control (as determined by the investigator or designee; one of the methods must be a barrier technique).
5. Female subjects must not be pregnant or lactating before enrollment in the study.
6. Male or female subjects must agree to practice 2 highly effective methods of birth control (as determined by the investigator or designee; one of the methods must be a barrier technique) from Screening until 30 days after the last dose of study drug.
7. Subject is highly likely (as determined by the investigator) to comply with the protocol defined procedures and to complete the study.

Exclusion criteria:

1. Subject has a safety 12 lead ECG result at Screening or Check in with evidence of any of the following abnormalities:

   • QTc using Fridericia correction (QTcF) >430 msec
   • PR interval >220 msec or <120 msec
   • QRS duration >110 msec
   • Second- or third-degree atrioventricular block
   • Complete left or right bundle branch block or incomplete right bundle branch block
   • Heart rate <50 or >90 beats per minute
   • Pathological Q-waves (defined as Q wave >40 msec)
   • Ventricular pre-excitation
2. Subject has more than 12 ectopic beats during the 3 hour Holter ECG at Screening.
3. Subject has a history of unexplained syncope, structural heart disease, long QT syndrome, heart failure, myocardial infarction, angina, unexplained cardiac arrhythmia, torsade de pointes, ventricular tachycardia, or placement of a pacemaker or implantable defibrillator. Subjects will also be excluded if there is a family history of long QT syndrome (genetically proven or suggested by sudden death of a close relative due to cardiac causes at a young age) or Brugada syndrome.
4. Subject has a history or current evidence of any clinically significant (as determined by the investigator) cardiovascular, dermatologic, endocrine, gastrointestinal, hematologic, hepatic, immunologic, metabolic, neurologic, psychiatric, pulmonary, renal, urologic, and/or other major disease or malignancy (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer). The investigator may allow exceptions to these criteria (e.g., cholecystectomy, childhood asthma) following discussion with the medical monitor.
5. Subject has a history of thoracic surgery.
6. Subject has any condition possibly affecting study drug absorption (e.g., gastrectomy, Crohn's disease, irritable bowel syndrome).
7. Subject has a skin condition likely to compromise ECG electrode placement.
8. Subject is a female with breast implants.
9. Subject's laboratory test results at Screening or Check in are outside the reference ranges provided by the clinical laboratory and considered clinically significant (as determined and documented by the investigator or designee).
10. Subject's laboratory test results at Screening or Check in indicate hypokalemia, hypocalcemia, or hypomagnesemia according to lower limits of the reference ranges provided by the clinical laboratory.
11. Subject's laboratory test results at Screening or Check in are >2 × the upper limit of normal (ULN) for alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase, >1.5 × ULN for bilirubin, or >1.5 × ULN for creatinine.
12. Subject has a positive test result at Screening for human immunodeficiency virus I or II antibody, hepatitis C virus antibodies, or hepatitis B surface antigen.
13. Subject has a mean systolic blood pressure <100 or >140 mmHg or a mean diastolic blood pressure <50 or >90 mmHg at either Screening or Check in. Blood pressure will be measured in triplicate after the subject has been resting in a supine position for a minimum of 5 minutes.
14. Subject has a known hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs or related compounds.
15. Subject has consumed alcohol, xanthine containing products (e.g., tea, coffee, chocolate, cola), caffeine, grapefruit, or grapefruit juice within 48 hours before dosing or anticipates an inability to abstain from these products throughout the duration of the study.
16. Subject has used nicotine containing products (e.g., cigarettes, cigars, chewing tobacco, snuff) within 6 weeks before Screening (self reported).
17. Subject is unable to tolerate a controlled, quiet, study conduct environment, including avoidance of music, television, movies, games, and activities that may cause excitement, emotional tension, or arousal during the prespecified time points (e.g., before and during ECG extraction windows).
18. Subject is unwilling to comply with study rules, including the study-specific diet, attempting to void at specified times (e.g., before ECG extraction windows), remaining quiet, awake, undistracted, motionless, and supine during specified times, and avoiding vigorous exercise as directed.
19. Subject has a history of consuming more than 14 units of alcoholic beverages per week within 6 months before Screening, has a history of alcoholism or drug/chemical/substance abuse within 2 years before Screening (Note: 1 unit = 12 ounces of beer, 4 ounces of wine, or 1 ounce of spirits/hard liquor), or has a positive test result for alcohol or drugs of abuse at Screening or Check in.
20. Subject has used any prescription or nonprescription drugs (including aspirin or nonsteroidal anti inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs] and excluding oral contraceptives and acetaminophen) within 14 days or 5 half lives (whichever is longer), or complementary and alternative medicines within 28 days before the first dose of study drug.
21. Subject is currently participating in another clinical study of an investigational drug or has been treated with any investigational drug within 30 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) of the compound.
22. Subject has had any significant blood loss, donated 1 unit (450 mL) of blood or more, or received a transfusion of any blood or blood products within 60 days, or donated plasma within 7 days before Check in.
23. Subject has any other condition that precludes his or her participation in the study (as determined by the investigator).
24. Subject is unwilling to have genetic analysis performed or a blood sample collected for isolating peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs).

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Other
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Quadruple

Number of Arms

6

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo; Placebo capsules	Drug: Placebo; Placebo (administered orally)
Active Comparator: Ranolazine; Ranolazine 1500 mg two times per day for 2.5 days	Drug: Ranolazine; Ranolazine 1500 mg orally two times per day for 2.5 days
Active Comparator: Verapamil; Verapamil 120 mg immediate release (IR) morning and afternoon doses on Days 1 and 2, 240 mg extended release (ER) evening dose on Days 1 and 2, and 120 mg IR morning dose on Day 3	Drug: Verapamil; Verapamil 120 mg immediate release (IR) morning and afternoon doses on Days 1 and 2, 240 mg extended release (ER) evening dose on Days 1 and 2, and 120 mg IR morning dose on Day 3 (all oral doses)
Active Comparator: Lopinavir / Ritonavir; Lopinavir / Ritonavir 800 mg / 200 mg two times per day for 2.5 days	Drug: Lopinavir / Ritonavir; Lopinavir / Ritonavir 800 mg / 200 mg orally two times per day for 2.5 days
Active Comparator: Chloroquine; Chloroquine 1000 mg on Day 1, 500 mg on Day 2, 1000 mg on Day 3	Drug: Chloroquine; Chloroquine 1000 mg on Day 1, 500 mg on Day 2, 1000 mg on Day 3 (all oral doses)
Active Comparator: Dofetilide and Diltiazem; In one period subjects receive Dofetilide 0.125 mg on Day 1, 0.375 mg on Day 3. In a second period (randomized cross-over) subject receive Diltiazem 120 mg IR morning dose on Day 8, 240 mg ER evening dose on Days 8 and 9, and 120 mg IR on Day 10 with coadministration of 0.25 mg dofetilide on Day 10.	Drug: Dofetilide and Diltiazem; In one period subjects receive Dofetilide 0.125 mg on Day 1, 0.375 mg on Day 3. In a second period (randomized cross-over) subject receive Diltiazem 120 mg IR morning dose on Day 8, 240 mg ER evening dose on Days 8 and 9, and 120 mg IR on Day 10 with coadministration of 0.25 mg dofetilide on Day 10.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change From Baseline J-Tpeakc With "Balanced Ion Channel" Drugs (Ranolazine, Verapamil, Lopinavir / Ritonavir)	The primary outcome measure for the "balanced ion channel" drugs (ranolazine, verapamil, lopinavir / ritonavir) is for the upper bound of the 2-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) to be <10 msec for the projected placebo-corrected change from baseline J-Tpeakc effect at the peak plasma level on Day 3 using a linear mixed-effects exposure response model. Placebo drug concentration was set to 0 (see SAP).	3 days
Change From Baseline QTc With "Predominant hERG" Blocking Drug (Chloroquine)	The primary outcome measure for the "predominant hERG" drug (chloroquine) is for the upper bound of the 2-sided 90% CI to be ≥10 msec for the projected placebo-corrected change from baseline QTc effect at the peak plasma level on Day 1 using a linear mixed-effects exposure response model	3 days
QTc Shortening From Calcium Block (Diltiazem) in the Presence of hERG Block (Dofetilide)	It will be assessed whether the projected QTc effect of dofetilide alone is significantly greater (i.e., p<0.05) than the projected QTc effect of the combination of dofetilide + diltiazem. This will be assessed at the dofetilide peak plasma level on Day 3 (computed from the combination of dofetilide + diltiazem) on the pooled dofetilide alone, diltiazem alone, and dofetilide + diltiazem data using a linear mixed effects model.; Subsequently, and if the test is significant for QTc, the same test will be performed to assess calcium block (diltiazem) effects on J-Tpeakc.	3 days

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
• Collaborators: Spaulding Clinical Research LLC

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Vicente J, Zusterzeel R, Johannesen L, Mason J, Sager P, Patel V, Matta MK, Li Z, Liu J, Garnett C, Stockbridge N, Zineh I, Strauss DG. Mechanistic Model-Informed Proarrhythmic Risk Assessment of Drugs: Review of the "CiPA" Initiative and Design of a Prospective Clinical Validation Study. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Jan;103(1):54-66. doi: 10.1002/cpt.896. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
• Vicente J. Update on the ECG component of the CiPA initiative. J Electrocardiol. 2018 Nov-Dec;51(6S):S98-S102. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2018.08.003. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
• Vicente J, Zusterzeel R, Johannesen L, Ochoa-Jimenez R, Mason JW, Sanabria C, Kemp S, Sager PT, Patel V, Matta MK, Liu J, Florian J, Garnett C, Stockbridge N, Strauss DG. Assessment of Multi-Ion Channel Block in a Phase I Randomized Study Design: Results of the CiPA Phase I ECG Biomarker Validation Study. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Apr;105(4):943-953. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1303. Epub 2019 Jan 18.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): March 14, 2017
• Primary Completion (Actual): June 26, 2017
• Study Completion (Actual): June 26, 2017

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: February 27, 2017
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: February 27, 2017
• First Posted (Actual): March 3, 2017

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): January 18, 2020
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: January 15, 2020
• Last Verified: January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Pathologic Processes; Heart Diseases; Cardiovascular Diseases; Congenital Abnormalities; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Cardiac Conduction System Disease; Heart Defects, Congenital; Cardiovascular Abnormalities; Long QT Syndrome; Physiological Effects of Drugs; Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Antihypertensive Agents; Vasodilator Agents; Anti-Infective Agents; Antiviral Agents; Enzyme Inhibitors; Anti-HIV Agents; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Antirheumatic Agents; Protease Inhibitors; Membrane Transport Modulators; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhibitors; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme Inhibitors; Sodium Channel Blockers; Calcium-Regulating Hormones and Agents; Antiprotozoal Agents; Antiparasitic Agents; Calcium Channel Blockers; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Viral Protease Inhibitors; Antimalarials; Amebicides; Potassium Channel Blockers; Ritonavir; Lopinavir; Chloroquine; Verapamil; Diltiazem; Ranolazine; Dofetilide
• Other Study ID Numbers: 16-086D; SCR-004 (Other Identifier: Spaulding Clinical Research LLC)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: Yes
• IPD Plan Description: Study protocol and statistical analysis plan released as supplementary materials together with study design and rationale manuscript. ECG analysis plan published together with an update of the CiPA initiative. Annotated ECG waveforms, pharmacokinetic, and other subject level clinical data released as ECGCIPA database in PhysioNet. Clinical study report and analytic code released as supporting information (i.e., study results report) of study results manuscript. See references section.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

January 2018: Study protocol and SAP (doi: 10.1002/cpt.896).

August 2018: ECG analysis plan (doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2018.08.003).

December 2018: Annotated ECG waveforms and clinical data database (https://physionet.org/physiobank/database/ecgcipa/)

December 2018: Study results report published (doi: 10.1002/cpt.1303)

• IPD Sharing Access Criteria: Open access
• IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type: Study Protocol; Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP); Clinical Study Report (CSR); Analytic Code

Study Data/Documents

1. Individual Participant Data Set
   Information identifier: ECGCIPA
   Information comments: ECG effects of ranolazine, verapamil, lopinavir+ritonavir, chloroquine, dofetilide, diltiazem, and dofetilide+diltiazem in a small sample size clinical study. The ECGCIPA database contains multi-channel ECG recordings, pharmacokinetic, and clinical data of 60 subjects participating in the CiPA ECG validation study.
2. Study Protocol
   Information comments: Study protocol included in the supporting information of the study design and rationale manuscript (Vicente et al. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2018, doi: 10.1002/cpt.896)
3. Statistical Analysis Plan
   Information comments: Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) included in the supporting information of the study design and rationale manuscript (Vicente et al. Clin Pharm Ther 2018, doi: 10.1002/cpt.896)
4. Study Results Report
   Information comments: Report with full baseline characteristics, adverse events frequencies by treatment, and Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) flow diagram, as well as detailed results for multiple ECG biomarkers, as described in the statistical analysis plan is available as Supplementary Materials S1 in the study results manuscript (Vicente et al. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2018 Nov 17. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1303. [Epub ahead of print])

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: Yes
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No
• product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.: No