Image Quality and Radiation Dose in Angiography

April 23, 2014 updated by: Michael Söderman, Karolinska University Hospital

XRES4 Neuro Claim Study

ClarityIQ is a novel X-ray imaging technology, that combines advanced real-time image noise reduction algorithms, with state-of-the-art hardware to reduce patient entrance dose significantly. This is realized by anatomy-specific optimization of the full acquisition chain (grid switch, beam filtering, pulse width, spot size, detector and image processing engine) for every clinical task individually. Furthermore, smaller focal spot sizes and shorter pulses are used, which are known to positively influence image quality . The final effect on the clinical image quality is investigated in this study.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The advent of interventional neuroradiology (INR) has changed the treatment of neurovascular diseases by reducing the procedural invasiveness and the recovery time needed by patients, thus improving clinical outcome. However, INR procedures often require many high-quality digital substraction angiography (DSA) runs and long total fluoroscopy times, which can result in patients being exposed to considerable radiation doses levels.

In order to introduce a dose reduction technology the most important aspect is to validate the diagnostic image information. Philips has developed a real-time noise reduction algorithm for DSA in neuroradiology that is capable to reduce the patient entrance dose by 75% without loss of image quality.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Solna, Sweden, SE-171 76
        • Karolinska University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-80
  • Normal kidney function
  • Neurologically intact
  • Planned for diagnostic angiography or endovascular treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Other conditions that limit the use of contrast media or ionizing radiation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Reduced radiation dose (ClarityIQ)
Low dose DSA (75% reduction compared to normal dose) with novel X-ray imaging technology
Digital substraction angiography (DSA) with reduced dose settings (75% reduction expected) in combination with conventional X-ray imaging technology.
Other Names:
  • ClarityIQ
Active Comparator: Normal radiation dose (AlluraXper)
Normal dose DSA with conventional X-ray technology.
Digital substraction angiography (DSA) with normal dose settings in combination with conventional X-ray imaging technology.
Other Names:
  • AlluraXper

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Image Quality. For Each Included Participant 2 Images (1 AlluraXper; 1 AlluraClarity) Were Evaluated.
Time Frame: 1 day

The images were evaluated in randomized, blinded, offline readings. The anonymized images were displayed in pairs, i.e. the reference image run on one monitor (randomly left or right side) with the corresponding quarter-dose image run on the adjacent monitor. Three neuroradiologists graded the arterial, capillary, and venous phases separately. For each characteristic the images quality (IQ) were rated on a scale of 1 to 5 as 1 (very poor), 2 (mediocre), 3 (average), 4 (good), 5 (very good/excellent). An overall IQ score (3-15) was calculated as the sum of the score for these characteristics.

A paired Student's t test is used to compare the overall IQ score between the 2 imaging techniques. If the upper limit of the 97.5% one-sided CI for the difference overall IQ between the two treatment groups does not exceed the pre-defined non-inferiority margin of 2.5 Clarity will be declared non-inferior to the current image acquisition settings for DSA.

1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Radiation Dose Measurements: Dose Area Product (DAP)
Time Frame: Participants were followed for the duration of the procedure
Percentage of dose reduction of ClarityIQ vs. AlluraXper in Dose Area Product (DAP) calculated by DAP/frame.
Participants were followed for the duration of the procedure

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Radiation Dose Measurements: Air Kerma (AK)
Time Frame: Participants were followed for the duration of the procedure
Percentage of dose reduction of ClarityIQ vs. AlluraXper in Air Kerma (AK) calculated by AK/frame.
Participants were followed for the duration of the procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael Söderman, MD, PhD, Karolinska University Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Tommy Andersson, MD, PhD, Karolinska University Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Staffan Holmin, MD, PhD, Karolinska University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 20, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 23, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

June 27, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 22, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2014

Last Verified

April 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Arteriovenous Malformations

Clinical Trials on Low dose DSA (75% reduction compared to normal dose) with novel X-ray imaging technology.

3
Subscribe