Surface EMGdi Evaluate the Efficacy of Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients With COPD: a Multi Center Prospective Study

March 12, 2024 updated by: Zhujiang Hospital

Surface Diaphragm EMG Evaluate the Clinical Efficacy of Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: a Multi Center Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

Pulmonary rehabilitation is recognized as a core component of the management of individuals with chronic obstructive respiratory disease, which has become first-line treatment besides drug therapy. However, in the current clinical evaluation system of pulmonary rehabilitation, there is still a lack of simple, objective index,which can be monitored at any time.Neural respiratory drive , as an important physiological index, is closely related to the symptoms and the severity of the disease. It may be a sensitive indicator to evaluate the effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation. Surface EMGdi can accurately evaluate neural respiratory drive , its detection is non-invasive, simple and safety . In recent years, with the development of signal detection and analysis technology, EMG recording is more stable, but as the related research samples were low, surface diaphragm EMG has not yet the establishment of standardization. Therefore, based on the previous work, the project was carried out in a multicenter randomized controlled study,in which the stable stage of COPD patients were included in different ways of pulmonary rehabilitation training, a comprehensive clinical assessment will be conducted before and after training. Compared with the traditional evaluation methods and standard esophageal diaphragmatic electromyography, surface EMGdi detect the changes of neural respiratory drive in patients with COPD,that can help to explore the application value of surface EMGdi in the assessment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with pulmonary rehabilitation, to provide a basis for the promotion of the diaphragm and the optimization of pulmonary rehabilitation program.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The patients with COPD will participate in a rehabilitation program for 52 weeks.

Participants in the proposed study will be randomly programmed into one of four intervention groups:

  1. Neither cycle training nor inspiratory muscle training.
  2. Cycle training program alone (performing on calibrated stationary cycle ergometer).
  3. Inspiratory muscle training alone (performing on threshold loading device).
  4. Combined cycle training and inspiratory muscle training(performing on calibrated stationary cycle ergometer and threshold loading device).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

500

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510282
        • Zhujiang Hospital,Southern Medical Universtiy

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged over 40 years old.
  • Patients with pulmonary function test of forced expiratory volume at one second(FEV1)/forced vital capacity(FVC) < 70%.
  • Patients in a clinically stable state
  • Patients who signed informed consent.
  • No participation in other pulmonary rehabilitation program within the previous 2 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with signs of an airway infection.
  • Patients with metabolic disease and serious cardiovascular disease.
  • Patients with Multiple pulmonary bulla.
  • Patients with poor compliance.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Control group
Neither cycle training nor inspiratory muscle training.
Neither cycle training nor inspiratory muscle training.
Experimental: Cycle training group
A calibrated cycle ergometer is used to do 30-minute cycling training session 3 days a week.
The most common device to perform cycle training is calibrated cycle ergometer.
Experimental: Inspiratory training group
A threshold loading device is used to perform 21-minute inspiratory muscle training 3 days a week.
Threshold loading device is used to perform inspiratory muscle training.
Experimental: Combined group
Calibrated cycle ergometer and threshold loading device are applied.A 30-minute cycle training is performed using calibrated cycle ergometer and a 21-minute inspiratory muscle training using threshold loading device 3 days a week.
Combined cycle training and inspiratory muscle training.The threshold loading device is composed of a mouth -piece attached to a small plastic cylinder that contains a spring-loaded poppet value. The valve opens to permit inspiratory flow only once the person has generated adequate negative intrathoracic pressure to condense the spring.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diaphragmatic function(composite outcome measure)
Time Frame: Change from baseline in diaphragm electromyogram.(8 weeks later, 26 weeks later, 52 weeks later)
Diaphragmatic function can be assessed by diaphragm electromyogram (EMGdi), which reflect the physiological activity of the diaphragm and indicate functional status of the central drive.
Change from baseline in diaphragm electromyogram.(8 weeks later, 26 weeks later, 52 weeks later)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Inspiratory muscle function(composite outcome measure)
Time Frame: Change from baseline in inspiratory muscle function.(8 weeks later, 26 weeks later, 52 weeks later)
Currently, the maximal inspiratory pressure (PImax) and maximal expiratory pressures(PEmax) are measured by a digital manometer (AZ-8205, AZ Instrument, Taichung City, Taiwan)and combined to evaluate inspiratory muscle function.
Change from baseline in inspiratory muscle function.(8 weeks later, 26 weeks later, 52 weeks later)
Pulmonary Function(composite outcome measure)
Time Frame: Change from baseline in pulmonary function.(8 weeks later, 26 weeks later, 52 weeks later)
Pulmonary function is measured using a spirometer(PonyFX 229, Cosmed, Rome, Italy) that is calibrated daily.The FEV1 and percent-of-predicted FEV1, FVC and percent-of-predicted FVC which are presented in one report are used to evaluate Pulmonary Function.
Change from baseline in pulmonary function.(8 weeks later, 26 weeks later, 52 weeks later)
Cardiopulmonary exercise test(composite outcome measure)
Time Frame: Change from baseline in cardiopulmonary exercise test.(8 weeks later, 26 weeks later, 52 weeks later)
Cardiopulmonary exercise test can help to reflect the variables,like maximaloxygen uptake(VO2max), anaerobic threshold (AT).
Change from baseline in cardiopulmonary exercise test.(8 weeks later, 26 weeks later, 52 weeks later)
Degree of dyspnea(composite outcome measure)
Time Frame: Change from baseline in degree of dyspnea.(8 weeks later, 26 weeks later, 52 weeks later)
Difference in the degree of dyspnea can be measured by Borg index.
Change from baseline in degree of dyspnea.(8 weeks later, 26 weeks later, 52 weeks later)
Exercise capacity(composite outcome measure)
Time Frame: Change from baseline in exercise performance.(8 weeks later, 26 weeks later, 52 weeks later)
Exercise capacity is evaluated using the 6-min walking distance (6MWD) according to American Thoracic Society guidelines.
Change from baseline in exercise performance.(8 weeks later, 26 weeks later, 52 weeks later)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Body Composition Monitor(composite outcome measure)
Time Frame: Change from baseline in body composition.(8 weeks later, 26 weeks later, 52 weeks later)
Body composition abnormalities are prevalent in COPD.Human body composition analyzer can detect various elements of human body and analyze human health status.
Change from baseline in body composition.(8 weeks later, 26 weeks later, 52 weeks later)
Health-related quality(composite outcome measure)
Time Frame: Change from baseline in Health-related quality.(8 weeks later, 26 weeks later, 52 weeks later)
Health-related quality is a component of the broader concept of quality of life and is defined as satisfaction with health.The St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRQ);and its self-reported version are the most widely used disease-specific questionnaires.
Change from baseline in Health-related quality.(8 weeks later, 26 weeks later, 52 weeks later)
Symptom Evaluation(composite outcome measure)
Time Frame: Change from baseline in symptom evaluation.(8 weeks later, 26 weeks later, 52 weeks later)
Individuals with chronic respiratory disease often have symptoms such as dyspnea, fatigue, cough, weakness,sleeplessness,and psychological distress.Instruments for assessment of multiple symptoms include COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and Modified Medical British Research Council Scale(mMRC).
Change from baseline in symptom evaluation.(8 weeks later, 26 weeks later, 52 weeks later)
Depression and anxiety evaluation(composite outcome measure)
Time Frame: Change from baseline in depression and anxiety evaluatione.(8 weeks later, 26 weeks later, 52 weeks later)
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was found to perform well in assessing the symptom severity and caseness of anxiety disorders and depression in both somatic, psychiatric and primary care patients and in the general population.
Change from baseline in depression and anxiety evaluatione.(8 weeks later, 26 weeks later, 52 weeks later)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 27, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

March 17, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

Clinical Trials on Control group

3
Subscribe