Intra-Articular Platelet Rich Plasm Use in Osteoarthritis of Knee.

January 16, 2019 updated by: Jose Carlos Nunes Tamashiro, Federal University of São Paulo

Intra-Articular Use of Platelet Rich Plasma Versus Corticosteroid: A Clinical Trials in Osteoarthritis of Knee.

Osteoarthritis of the knee is a very prevalent disease. However, there are few therapeutic options for its patients. Platelet-rich plasma is a treatment option for chronic pain. If proven to be effective in its intra-articular use, Platelet-rich plasma may help in the treatment of these patients.

Goal:

Primary objective: To compare effectiveness in improving pain and function and the medium-term tolerance (12 weeks) of intra-articular injection of Platelet-rich plasma versus intraarticular injection of triamcinolone hexacetonide in patients with symptomatic primary knee osteoarthritis.

Secondary objective: To compare the medium-term effectiveness of intra-articular injection of Platelet-rich plasma versus intra-articular injection of triamcinolone hexacetonide to improve synovial hypertrophy and quality of life in these patients.

Methods: A prospective randomized controlled double-blind study with three groups (each with n = 33) of patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis of knees who will receive intra-articular infiltration in a single moment. Patients will be allocated to one of three groups: 1) Platelet-rich plasma group: patients who will receive plasma; 2) triamcinolone hexacetonide Group: patients who will receive 40mg of triamcinolone hexacetonide; And 3) Isotonic saline solution group: patients who will receive isotonic saline solution. The patients will be evaluated by "blind" evaluators in 4 assessment times up to 12 weeks of follow-up through clinical assessment instruments (rest and movement pain, joint edema, goniometry, clinical improvement scale, quality of life questionnaire as the SF36), functional (Womac questionnaire, M. Lequesne Functional Knee Index, 6 min walk test, Time up and go test), and ultrasound test (quantitative and semiquantitative measurement of synovial hypertrophy and semiquantitative Power Doppler).

Statistics: The following statistical tests will be used according to the need: Student's t test, Mann-whitney, Pearson's chi-square test and ANOVA for repeated measures. A statistical significance of 5% will be considered.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

99

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • SP
      • Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil, 04023900
        • Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • primary knee osteoarthritis
  • degree II and II in Kellgren & Lawrence classification
  • pain duration: more than three months
  • pain in the visual analogue scale between 4 and 8cm
  • agree in participate and sign the consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • secondary knee osteoarthritis
  • skin lesion in knee
  • intraarticular joint injection in the previous three months
  • steroids use in the previous 30 days
  • degree I or IV in Kellgren & Lawrence classification
  • inflammatory arthritis, gout and pseudo-gout
  • cancer
  • previous surgery in knee
  • cardiovascular and respiratory disease that change functional status
  • pregnancy and breastfeed
  • coagulation disturb
  • bacterial infection
  • handicapped
  • NSAIDs and Platelet anticoagulant in the previous month

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Platelet rich plasm group
intra-articular infiltration with platelet rich plasm
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Triamcinolone Hexacetonide group
intra-articular infiltration withTriamcinolone Hexacetonide
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Isotonic Saline Solution group
intra-articular infiltration with Isotonic Saline Solution

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in pain
Time Frame: Baseline, after 4, 8, 12 and 48 weeks
Evaluated using a visual analogue scale
Baseline, after 4, 8, 12 and 48 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in joint edema
Time Frame: Baseline, after 4, 8, 12 and 48 weeks
Evaluated using a visual analogue scale
Baseline, after 4, 8, 12 and 48 weeks
Change in range of motion
Time Frame: Baseline, after 4, 8, 12 and 48 weeks
Evaluated using goniometry
Baseline, after 4, 8, 12 and 48 weeks
Change in a clinical improvement scale
Time Frame: Baseline, after 4, 8, 12 and 48 weeks
Evaluated using an improvement scale
Baseline, after 4, 8, 12 and 48 weeks
Change in quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline, after 4, 8, 12 and 48 weeks
Using the SF-36 questionnaire
Baseline, after 4, 8, 12 and 48 weeks
Change in functional capacity
Time Frame: Baseline, after 4, 8, 12 and 48 weeks
Using the WOMAC questionnaire
Baseline, after 4, 8, 12 and 48 weeks
Change in functional capacity
Time Frame: Baseline, after 4, 8, 12 and 56 weeks
Using the M Lequesne questionnaire
Baseline, after 4, 8, 12 and 56 weeks
Change in functional capacity
Time Frame: Baseline, after 4, 8, 12 and 48 weeks
Using the six minute walk test
Baseline, after 4, 8, 12 and 48 weeks
Change in functional capacity
Time Frame: Baseline, after 4, 8, 12 and 48 weeks
Using the time to up and go test
Baseline, after 4, 8, 12 and 48 weeks
Changing in quantitative and semiquantitative measurement of synovial hypertrophy and semiquantitative Power Doppler
Time Frame: Baseline, after 4, 8, 12 and 48 weeks
Using an ultrasound exam
Baseline, after 4, 8, 12 and 48 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 2, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 2, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 2, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 16, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

March 22, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 18, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knee Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on platelet rich plasm

Subscribe