Early Point-Of-Care Blood Tests, ECG & X-rays in the Emergency Department (EPOC-BEX-ED)

August 8, 2017 updated by: Dr LN Goldstein, Helen Joseph Hospital

An Assessment of the Impact of Enhanced Workflow Patterns Associated With Upfront, Early Point-of-care Testing on Costs, Waiting and Disposition Times in an Emergency Department

The 2015 Abbott Point-of-Care Great Minds Summit in Berlin presented novel research that showed the potential for upfront, point-of-care (POC) blood testing to improve waiting times, costs and patient flow in the Emergency Department (ED). POC testing has become a focus area for enquiry as EDs worldwide look for ways to cope with over-crowding and reduce waiting times.

In South African EDs, the target time for patients to be seen is dictated by their triage category. Patients triaged Red (critical) should ideally be seen immediately, Orange within 10 minutes, Yellow within 1 hour and Green within 4 hours of arrival. Whilst patients may initially be evaluated within the above time frames, there may be delays in their final disposition due to time lags in obtaining results from special tests and/or investigations. Traditionally, blood tests and other special investigations such as electrocardiograms (ECG) and radiological investigations (x-rays) take place after the doctor has evaluated the patient. Patients (and doctors) then have to wait for the results of these tests before a decision can be made regarding the patient's final disposition.

Instead of sending blood specimens to the laboratory for analysis, POC blood testing refers to selected tests which can be performed in the ED and provide immediate on-site results and thus have the potential to expedite patient management decisions. Similarly, low dose x-ray (LODOX®) is the radiological equivalent of a POC blood test providing a full body x-ray within 19 seconds. LODOX has been evaluated in trauma patients previously but its application as a screening tool for non-trauma patients in the ED has not been properly explored thus far. Electrocardiograms (ECGs) are commonly used in clinical medicine as a POC test to evaluate the heart. Locally, Helen Joseph Hospital ED in Johannesburg has a constant influx of critically ill and injured patients 24 hours a day. The aim of this investigator-initiated, prospective, randomised control trial is to compare and assess the standard workflow pathway currently in use in the ED to a modified pathway that makes use of upfront, early POC tests (blood tests, ECG and/or LODOX) to see if the use of such has any significant effect on costs, waiting times and associated patient flow patterns in the ED.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The Helen Joseph Hospital ED has a constant influx of critically ill and injured patients 24 hours a day. On average, 170 - 200 patients are triaged and evaluated per day - approximately 60 000-70000 patients per annum.

EDs world-wide are constantly looking for ways to decrease patient over-crowding and waiting times. Suggested solutions have included the hiring of additional personnel, creating observation units, ambulance diversion and triage. Some have even tried to improve patient flow by placing a senior consultant in the triage area.

In South African EDs, the South African Triage Scale (SATS) is utilised to assess severity and acuity of patients presenting to the ED. The target time for patients to be seen is dictated by their triage category. Patients triaged Red should ideally be seen immediately, Orange within 10 minutes, Yellow within 1 hour and Green within 4 hours of arrival. Whilst patients may initially be evaluated within these time frames, there may be delays in their final disposition due to time lags in obtaining results from special investigations.

Traditionally, investigations in the ED take place after the doctor has evaluated the patient. Patients (and doctors) then have to wait for the results of the investigations. Further decisions on the patients' ultimate disposition (i.e. either discharged home or admitted for inpatient care) are thus contingent upon the results of the investigations.

POC blood testing (as opposed to sending blood to the laboratory to be analysed) has been shown to be accurate and assist in expediting patient management by decreasing the turnaround time for results. Low dose x-ray (LODOX®) has been marketed as a quick and easy radiological screening tool for trauma patients that can even be used as a triage tool. The LODOX can produce a full body antero-posterior x-ray image within 19 seconds. It is much quicker and exposes the patient to less radiation than a standard radiograph/x-ray. It can therefore also be categorised as the x-ray equivalent of a POC test. Its use has never been evaluated as a tool for non-trauma patients in the ED. Electrocardiograms (ECGs) are commonly used in clinical medicine as a POC test to evaluate the heart.

The aim of this study is therefore to assess whether, individually or in combination, upfront, early POC blood tests, ECGs and/or LODOX can decrease waiting times, reduce costs and improve patient flow in the ED.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1134

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Gauteng
      • Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa, 2006
        • Helen Joseph Hospital Emergency Department

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

All consenting adult patients older than 18 years old, with the one of the symptom groups below, that present to Helen Joseph Hospital ED, who do not require immediate resuscitation i.e. not triaged red. This will be performed during weekdays only.

Presenting symptom groups:

  • Abdominal/epigastric/stomach pain/vomiting
  • Psychosis/aggression/hallucinations (see Ethical Considerations)
  • Shortness of breath/dyspnoea/cough/chest pain/syncope
  • General body pain/weakness
  • Overdose

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Failure to obtain consent
  • Pregnant patients
  • Patients who require immediate resuscitation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Current workflow pathway
In the Current (normal) Workflow Pathway, after a patient is triaged, they are reviewed by the doctor. It is routine for the doctor to then order diagnostic tests/investigations that include blood tests, which are analysed at the laboratory, x-rays, which are performed in the Radiology department, and an ECG, which is performed by an ECG technician. Once the results of those tests are ready, the doctor will then review the patient a second time with all the results. The decision for patient disposition will then be made
Experimental: Enhanced workflow pathway iSTAT
Patients will receive i-STAT point-of-care troponin, INR (International Normalised Ratio), CG4(blood gas analysis) and chem8 tests prior to seeing the doctor.
iSTAT troponin, INR, CG4+ and Chem8
Experimental: Enhanced workflow pathway iSTAT CBC
Patients will receive iSTAT point-of-care troponin, INR, CG4+ and chem8 tests as well as a CBC prior to seeing the doctor.
iSTAT troponin, INR, CG4+ and Chem8
Complete Blood Count
Experimental: Enhanced workflow pathway ECG
Patients will receive a 12lead, v1R-v6R(right sided ECG leads) and V7-V9 ECG prior to seeing the doctor.
ElectroCardioGram
Experimental: Enhanced workflow pathway Lodox
Patients will receive a supine AP and lateral lodox (low dose x-ray) of their chest and abdomen prior to seeing the doctor.
Low dose x-ray
Experimental: Enhanced workflow pathway iSTAT ECG
Patients will receive iSTAT point-of-care troponin, INR, CG4+ and chem8 tests as well as 12lead, v1R-v6R and V7-V9 ECG prior to seeing the doctor.
iSTAT troponin, INR, CG4+ and Chem8
ElectroCardioGram
Experimental: Enhanced workflow pathway iSTAT, CBC ECG
Patients will receive iSTAT point-of-care troponin, INR, CG4+ and chem8 tests, CBC and 12lead, v1R-v6R and V7-V9 ECG prior to seeing the doctor.
iSTAT troponin, INR, CG4+ and Chem8
Complete Blood Count
ElectroCardioGram
Experimental: Enhanced workflow pathway iSTAT lodox
Patients will receive iSTAT point-of-care troponin, INR, CG4+ and chem8 tests and Lodox prior to seeing the doctor.
iSTAT troponin, INR, CG4+ and Chem8
Low dose x-ray
Experimental: Enhanced workflow pathway iSTAT CBC Lodox
iSTAT point-of-care troponin, INR, CG4+ and chem8 tests; CBC and Lodox prior to seeing the doctor.
iSTAT troponin, INR, CG4+ and Chem8
Complete Blood Count
Low dose x-ray
Experimental: Enhanced workflow pathway ECG Lodox
Patients will receive LODOX and 12lead, v1R-v6R and V7-V9 ECG prior to seeing the doctor.
ElectroCardioGram
Low dose x-ray
Experimental: Enhanced workflow pathway iSTAT ECG Lodox
iSTAT point-of-care troponin, INR, CG4+ and chem8 tests; LODOX and 12lead, v1R-v6R and V7-V9 ECG prior to seeing the doctor
iSTAT troponin, INR, CG4+ and Chem8
ElectroCardioGram
Low dose x-ray
Experimental: Enhanced workflow pathway iSTAT CBC ECG Lodox
Patients will receive iSTAT point-of-care troponin, INR, CG4+ and chem8 tests; CBC, LODOX and 12lead, v1R-v6R and V7-V9 ECG prior to seeing the doctor.
iSTAT troponin, INR, CG4+ and Chem8
Complete Blood Count
ElectroCardioGram
Low dose x-ray

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Decrease waiting and disposition times for patients presenting to the Emergency Department
Time Frame: From patient Arrival in the Emergency Department until disposition (i.e. until the decision to admit or discharge the patient is made) through study completion (approximately 4 months)
Measurement of waiting and workflow times compared to current workflow pathway
From patient Arrival in the Emergency Department until disposition (i.e. until the decision to admit or discharge the patient is made) through study completion (approximately 4 months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Decrease the costs of special investigations for patients presenting to the Emergency Department
Time Frame: Compare the costs for standard care to costs of point-of-care intervention through study completion (approximately 4 months)
Measurement of cost implications
Compare the costs for standard care to costs of point-of-care intervention through study completion (approximately 4 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 13, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 16, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

April 5, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 9, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • EPOC-BEX-ED

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Emergency Medicine

Clinical Trials on iSTAT

3
Subscribe