Better Patient Selection to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

June 27, 2023 updated by: Per Steinar Halvorsen, Oslo University Hospital
This study evaluates whether a preoperative assessment of myocardial contractile reserve by tissue Doppler Imaging and myocardial fibrosis by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can enhance the patient selection and risk stratification to transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In this prospective observation study we will investigate whether a preoperative test of myocardial contractile reserve can predict adverse outcome after TAVI. We intend to examine preoperative myocardial contractile reserve by use a low dose dobutamine test and relate this to pre-existing myocardial focal and diffuse myocardial fibrosis detected by new cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) methods and new echocardiographic methods. These measures will be primarily related to long term (12 months) mortality.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

103

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Oslo, Norway, 0424
        • Oslo Universtity Hospital
      • Oslo, Norway, 0424
        • The Intervention Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients scheduled for transfemoral aortic valve implantation at Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients declined surgical aortic valve replacement and scheduled for transfemoral aortic valve implantation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Aortic valve endocarditis
  • aortic annulus >31mm
  • preoperative pacemaker
  • severe aortic insufficiency (>grad 3)
  • rapid atrial fibrillation
  • unprotected left main coronary stenosis not suitable for percutaneous intervention.
  • unstable angina
  • life expectancy less than 12 months
  • mental disorder including dementia and condition which interferes with protocol compliance.
  • renal failure (glomerular filtration rate < 45 ml/min/m2), only have T1 mapping by CMRI.
  • Patients with metal not suitable for MRI.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Preoperative myocardial reserve yes/no
Patients with extensive myocardial fibrosis typically presents with limited myocardial contractile reserve that can be assessed by a dobutamine stress test. The patients will be allocated to a responder and non-responder group according to the results from this test.
Test of myocardial reserve

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MACE
Time Frame: 1 year
MACE at 12 months follow-up after TAVI, MACE definition: rehospitalization for heart failure or other valve related complications, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or (cardiovascular) death
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
NYHA functional classification of heart failure, Lack of improvement and/ or function class III or IV 12 months after the procedure defined unfavorable outcome
Time Frame: 1 year
Number of Participants hospitalizated for heart related diseases during 12 month follow-up.
1 year
6 Minute Walking Test
Time Frame: 1 year
Favorable outcome defined as improvement in walking distance of 30 meters or longer at one year follow up.
1 year
Patient quality of life (QoL)
Time Frame: 1 year
Quality of life record (SF 36), Physical function (age adjusted normal value 71.6 (SD 26.9)) and Physical role (age adjusted normal value 57.0 (SD 43.8)) , the patients were divided into groups using the predefined minimal change of 15 and 18,75 points, respectively. Changes above these tresholds at 12 month follow-up indicat better QoL outcomes.
1 year

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of life
Time Frame: 1 year
SF 36
1 year
Left ventricular function
Time Frame: 1 year
Dimensions, and systolic and diastolic function
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Erik Fosse, Professor, The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 26, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 5, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 29, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 27, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myocardial Fibrosis

Clinical Trials on Dobutamine stress test

Subscribe