Efficacy of Ketamine Infusion Compared With Traditional Anti-epileptic Agents in Refractory Status Epilepticus

May 18, 2021 updated by: Vinodkumar Singh, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Efficacy of Ketamine Infusion Compared With Traditional Anti-epileptic Agents in Refractory Status Epilepticus- a Pilot Study

The study will investigate the efficacy of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist ketamine as a first line agent in refractory status epilepticus versus traditional general anesthetic agents used for burst suppression that target the gamma-aminobutyric acid adrenergic receptors.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The traditional treatment for refractory status epilepticus includes diazepam, midazolam, valproic acid, thiopental and propofol. These medications fail to control seizure activity in 20-40% of patients. This is attributed to decrease in activity of gamma-aminobutyric acid receptors along with reciprocal up regulation of N-Methyl-D-aspartate receptors. Glutamate activation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors promotes calcium influx and excitotoxicity. Ketamine, an intravenous anesthetic agent which is a non-competitive antagonist of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors can block the flow of Ca and Na and by combining with phencyclidine binding sites inside the ion channel of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors, reduce the epileptiform burst discharges and after potential. Therefore, targeting the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors with ketamine may provide a novel approach to control refractory seizures. Moreover, by blocking glutamate mediated N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor induced neurotoxicity, ketamine may render neuroprotection. Ketamine also provides additional advantage of hemodynamic stability. Currently, ketamine is used as a last resort drug in the treatment of refractory status epilepticus.

The specific aim is to determine whether continuous infusion of ketamine as a first line agent for refractory status epilepticus is effective in controlling seizures.

The central hypothesis of our proposal is that early treatment with ketamine will be much more efficacious in controlling refractory status compared to the traditional treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35249
        • UAB Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 98 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients more than 18 years of age with a diagnosis of status epilepticus
  • Considered for burst suppression therapy after failing 2 or 3 anti-epileptic medications

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Post anoxic status epilepticus
  • Pregnant women, as confirmed by urine, or blood human chorionic gonadotropin, ultrasound or physical exam
  • Prisoners
  • Age less than 18 years
  • Allergy or sensitivity to the drug in question

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Traditional Treatment (Group T)
Group T patients will be placed into burst suppression with the traditional drug infusions which include any single or combination of drugs; usually benzodiazepines, barbiturates and or propofol.
Patients will receive traditional drug infusions
Other Names:
  • benzodiazepines, barbiturates, propofol
Active Comparator: Ketamine Infusion (Group K)
Patients in the group K arm will receive a loading dose of 2.5 mg/kg of ketamine followed by a continuous infusion with a starting dose of 3mg/kg/hr with titration in 1mg/kg/hr increments until burst suppression is achieved or a maximum dose of 10mg/kg/hr is reached. After 48 hours of burst suppression the ketamine dosage will be reduced by 2mg/kg/hr in a stepwise fashion to evaluated for EEG or clinical evidence of seizure recurrence.
Patients will receive loading dose of 2.5 mg/kg of ketamine followed by a continuous infusion with a starting dose of 3mg/kg/hr with titration in 1mg/kg/hr increments until burst suppression is achieved or a maximum dose of 10mg/kg/hr is reached
Other Names:
  • Ketalar

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time taken for burst suppression
Time Frame: Baseline to 1 hr
Average time for burst suppression
Baseline to 1 hr
Time taken for termination of seizures
Time Frame: Baseline to 24 hrs
Average time for seizures to terminate
Baseline to 24 hrs

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Use of vasopressors
Time Frame: baseline to 72 hrs
The need of vasopressors
baseline to 72 hrs
Number of days on ventilator
Time Frame: Baseline to 72 hrs
Total number of days patient is on the ventilator
Baseline to 72 hrs
Length of stay in ICU
Time Frame: Baseline to 72 hrs postoperatively
Total number of days in the ICU
Baseline to 72 hrs postoperatively
Use of parenteral or enteral nutrition
Time Frame: Baseline to 72 hrs postoperatively
Nutrition provided through a feeding tube or catheter
Baseline to 72 hrs postoperatively
Medical imaging results
Time Frame: Post-op Day 2 to Post-op day 10
MRI scans 7 to 10 days after burst suppression
Post-op Day 2 to Post-op day 10
Mortality
Time Frame: baseline to post-op day 10
death
baseline to post-op day 10

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Vinodkumar Singh, MD, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 4, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

May 18, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 10, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

April 14, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 21, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Refractory Epilepsy

Clinical Trials on Traditional Treatment (Group T)

3
Subscribe