The Utility of Positive Psychology in Military TBI Rehabilitation

Service members and veterans (SMVs) report more persisting symptoms following traumatic brain injury (TBI) compared to civilian populations (Ommaya, Ommaya, Dannenber, & Salazar, 1996). Therefore, it is important to utilize interventions that reduce psychological impairments and increase resiliency during military TBI rehabilitation. Unlike traditional behavioral health treatments that focus on reducing maladaptive behaviors and negative thoughts, positive psychological treatments focus on increasing positive emotions to increase well-being. There is substantial growing evidence demonstrating that cultivating positive emotions is preventative and improves resiliency and psychological (Bolier et al., 2013; Sin & Lyumbomirsky, 2009), cognitive (Estrada, Isen, & Young, 1997; Ashby & Isen, 1999; Isen & Daubman, 1984; Isen, Daubman, & Nowicki, 1987; Fredrickson & Branigan, 2001), and health outcomes (Pressman & Cohen, 2005). This study will examine the effectiveness of traditional behavioral health treatment versus behavioral health treatment with an added positive psychological group treatment in terms of psychological, cognitive, and health outcomes during TBI rehabilitation. The hypothesis is that SMV's with TBI will experience improved outcomes with added positive psychological treatment compared to traditional behavioral health treatment alone.

There will be about 100 people taking part in the study, randomly assigned to either a traditional behavioral health treatment group or an alternative behavioral health treatment group (therefore, up to 50 people will be enrolled in each) at the Fort Belvoir Intrepid Spirit Center over a period of 30 months. Study participants will be randomly assigned to groups, and over 3 months the study procedures include participating in group behavioral health treatment and/or individual behavioral health treatment and completing pre/post-treatment questionnaires focusing on psychological, cognitive, and health outcomes. The behavioral health intervention has not been well-studied; thus, the behavioral health intervention is considered experimental for the treatment of psychological symptoms. Additionally, the impact on other areas of functioning (i.e., cognitive functioning and overall health) is currently unknown.

Study Overview

• Status: Withdrawn
• Conditions: Traumatic Brain Injury
• Intervention / Treatment: Behavioral: Traditional Behavioral Health Treatment; Behavioral: Positive Psychological Group Treatment

• Study Type: Interventional
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Virginia
    • Fort Belvoir, Virginia, United States, 22060
      • Fort Belvoir Community Hospital

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Documented mild TBI or moderate TBI.
• Individual is recommended to have a Behavioral Health provider at ISC Fort Belvoir for general TBI-related psychological impairments.
• Individual has decision making capacity for informed consent based on medical provider clinical judgement and initial evaluation.
• Individual scored a 14 or lower on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, indicating no worse than moderate depressive symptoms.
• Individual is 18 years or older.
• Individual is Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System-eligible.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Individuals with severe depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 score above 14).
• Documented severe traumatic brain injury.
• Minors and pediatric populations.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Single

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Traditional Behavioral Health Treatment	Behavioral: Traditional Behavioral Health Treatment; Treatment will include traditional individual behavioral health treatment, involving CBT-based therapeutic interventions for presenting diagnoses (typically depression, anxiety, or PTSD-related symptomatology).
Experimental: Positive Psychological Group Treatment	Behavioral: Traditional Behavioral Health Treatment; Treatment will include traditional individual behavioral health treatment, involving CBT-based therapeutic interventions for presenting diagnoses (typically depression, anxiety, or PTSD-related symptomatology).; Behavioral: Positive Psychological Group Treatment; Positive psychological group treatment will involve engagement in traditional behavioral health treatment, as well as a group treatment focusing on previously researched exercises that have been demonstrated to relate to reduced depression and increased positive emotionality (Seligman, Rashid, Parks, et al., 2005; Seligman, Rashid, & Parks, 2006; Rashid, 2015).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change in Positive Affect	The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) is a self-report questionnaire on which participants rate adjectives of positive and negative feelings on a scale from 1 (very slightly/not at all) to 5 (extremely) according to how much they are currently experiencing that feeling. The sum of the positive items provides a measure of positive affect at each time point.	Pre-treatment and at 3 month follow-up following study completion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change in Hope	The Hope Scale is a 12-item self-report questionnaire examining a patient's willful sense of determination to meet goals and a patient's perceived availability of ways to attain a goal. Higher ratings indicate greater hope at time of measurement.	Pre-treatment and at 3 month follow-up following study completion
Change in Life Satisfaction	The General Life Satisfaction scale from NIH Toolbox is a 5-item scale designed to measure global cognitive judgments of one's life satisfaction. Participants indicate how much they agree or disagree with each of the 5 items using a 7-point scale that ranges from 7 strongly agree to 1 strongly disagree. The total summed score will indicate satisfaction with life.	Pre-treatment and at 3 month follow-up following study completion
Change in Depression	The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 is a 9-item measure given to screen for the presence and severity of depression. The total summed score indicates level of depression.	Pre-treatment and at 3 month follow-up following study completion
Change in Perceived Stress	The Perceived Stress scale from NIH Toolbox is a 10-item measure given to assess perceptions about the nature of events and their relationship to the values and coping resources of an individual. Participants indicate how often behaviors and/or thoughts related to stress have occurred on a 5-point scale (Never to Very Often). The total summed score indicates overall perceived stress.	Pre-treatment and at 3 month follow-up following study completion
Change in Cognitive Functioning	The Cognitive Functioning scale from Neuro QOL includes 8 items measuring perceived difficulties in cognitive abilities (e.g., memory, attention, and decision making, or in the application of such abilities to everyday tasks (e.g., planning, organizing, calculating, remembering and learning). Items are answered as 1=Not at all, 2=A little bit, 3=Somewhat, 4=Quite a bit, 5=Very much. The total summed score indicates perceived cognitive functioning.	Pre-treatment and at 3 month follow-up following study completion
Change in Fatigue	The Fatigue scale from Neuro QOL includes 8 items measuring sensations of tiredness to exhaustion that decreases one's capacity for physical, functional, social, and mental activities. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from never to always. The total summed score indicates level of fatigue.	Pre-treatment and at 3 month follow-up following study completion
Change in Pain Intensity	The Pain Intensity Survey from NIH Toolbox includes one item for self-reporting a participant's level of pain in the past seven days, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).	Pre-treatment and at 3 month follow-up following study completion
Change in Negative Affect	The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) is a self-report questionnaire on which participants rate adjectives of positive and negative feelings on a scale from 1 (very slightly/not at all) to 5 (extremely) according to how much they are currently experiencing that feeling. The sum of the negative items provides a measure of negative affect at each time point.	Pre-treatment and at 3 month follow-up following study completion

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Fort Belvoir Community Hospital
• Collaborators: The Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Deepa Elion, PhD, Fort Belvoir Community Hospital

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Ashby FG, Isen AM, Turken AU. A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychol Rev. 1999 Jul;106(3):529-50. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.106.3.529.
• Seligman ME, Steen TA, Park N, Peterson C. Positive psychology progress: empirical validation of interventions. Am Psychol. 2005 Jul-Aug;60(5):410-21. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.60.5.410.
• Bolier L, Haverman M, Westerhof GJ, Riper H, Smit F, Bohlmeijer E. Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. BMC Public Health. 2013 Feb 8;13:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-119.
• Pressman SD, Cohen S. Does positive affect influence health? Psychol Bull. 2005 Nov;131(6):925-971. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.925.
• Seligman MEP, Rashid T, Parks AC. Positive psychotherapy. Am Psychol. 2006 Nov;61(8):774-788. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.8.774.
• Estrada C, Isen AM, & Young MJ (1997). Positive affect facilitates integration of information and decreases anchoring in reasoning among physicians. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 72, 117-135.
• Isen, AM, & Daubman, KA (1984). The influence of affect on categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(6), 1206-1217.
• Isen AM, Daubman KA, Nowicki GP. Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Jun;52(6):1122-31. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.52.6.1122.
• Fredrickson, BL, Branigan, A (2001). Positive emotions. In: Mayne, T.J.; Bonnano, G.A., editors. Emotion: Current issues and future developments. New York: Guilford Press, 123-151.
• Rashid, T (2015). Positive psychotherapy: A strength-based approach. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10 (1), 25-40.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Anticipated): September 1, 2019
• Primary Completion (Anticipated): June 1, 2021
• Study Completion (Anticipated): October 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: March 18, 2019
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: February 3, 2020
• First Posted (Actual): February 6, 2020

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): February 6, 2020
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: February 3, 2020
• Last Verified: February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Brain Diseases; Central Nervous System Diseases; Nervous System Diseases; Wounds and Injuries; Craniocerebral Trauma; Trauma, Nervous System; Brain Injuries; Brain Injuries, Traumatic
• Other Study ID Numbers: The UPP Study; WRNMMC-2019-0216 (Other Identifier: WRNMMC)

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No