Comparison Between 2% Lidocaine Gel and 5% Tetracaine Eye Drop as Topical Anesthesia in Phacoemulsification

February 27, 2018 updated by: Susilo Chandra, Indonesia University
This study aimed to compare the efficacy between 2% lidocaine gel vs 0.5% tetracaine eye drop as topical anesthesia in phacoemulsification

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Approval from Ethical Committee of Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia was acquired prior conducting the study. Subjects were given informed consent before enrolling the study and randomized into two groups (Lidocaine gel and tetracaine eye drop group). Lidocaine group received 2% lidocaine gel in 1 ml syringe, applied to the eye. Tetracaine group received 0.5% tetracaine eye drop. Topical anesthesia was given 5 minutes before phacoemulsification. Five minutes after phacoemulsification finished, visual analog score (VAS) and subjects and surgeon's satisfaction were assessed. Every additional topical anesthesia needed was recorded.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

72

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Jakarta, Indonesia, 10430
        • Cipto Mangunkusumo Central National Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients aged more than 40 years old who were planned to undergo elective phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation at operating room. The surgery was operated by an experienced ophthalmologist. Subjects had been explained about the study, and agreed to enroll and have signed the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with history of allergy to topical anesthesia (2% lidocaine gel and 0.5% tetracaine eye drop), subjects who used another method of intraoperative anesthesia other than topical anesthesia, subjects with history of phacoemulsification before, subjects with difficulty in communication, dementia, and anxiety.

Dropout Criteria:

  • Phacoemulsifications duration more than 30 minutes, and subjects who resigned from the study before the study ended

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: lidocaine gel
Lidocaine gel group: received 2% lidocaine gel in 1 ml syringe, applied to the eye 5 minutes before phacoemulsification
2% lidocaine gel in 1 ml syringe, applied to the eye 5 minutes before phacoemulsification
Active Comparator: tetracaine eye drop
Tetracaine eye drop group: received 0.5% tetracaine eye drop 5 minutes before phacoemulsification
0.5% tetracaine eye drop was given 5 minutes before phacoemulsification

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual analog scale
Time Frame: Day 1
assessing subject's pain with visual analog scale
Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Additional topical anesthesia requirement
Time Frame: Day 1
Number of additional topical anesthesia given after the first dose
Day 1
Subjects and surgeon's satisfactory
Time Frame: Day 1
Assessment is done using questionnaire
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 4, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 8, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 28, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2018

Last Verified

February 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Adult Patients Undergoing Phacoemulsification With Topical Anesthesia

Clinical Trials on lidocaine gel

3
Subscribe