The Effect of AposTherapy on Knee Pain (AposKnee)

November 17, 2022 updated by: Matthew Bartels, Montefiore Medical Center

The Effect of AposTherapy on Pain and Function in Knee Osteoarthritis Population: A Randomized Controlled Trial

AposTherapy is a home based exercise program utilizing footwear that causes exercise with normal activity that may significantly improve function in patients with knee osteoarthritis since patients with knee osteoarthritis have altered mechanics of motion contributing or due to the presence of the conditions. Capitalizing on the reported excellent adherence and clinical benefit of ApostTherapy in patients with significant knee OA, the investigators propose to evaluate this as a conservative treatment that may supplant/supplement traditional pain medications and physical therapy in an at-risk urban inner city population.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

AposTherapy is a home-based exercise program utilizing footwear that causes exercise with normal daily activity that may significantly improve function in patients with knee pain in general, and specifically knee osteoarthritis (OA). Capitalizing on the reported excellent adherence and clinical benefit of Apos Therapy in patients with significant lower limb arthritis, the investigators propose to evaluate this as a conservative treatment that may supplant/supplement traditional pain medications and physical therapy in knee OA population.

A potential use of AposTherapy as a replacement for traditional physical therapy may yield a less costly, more effective therapy with better adherence. Problems with traditional therapy include poor patient adherence (patients often do not complete the sessions and have very poor adherence (about 50-60%) to home therapy programs), added cost of travel (which may be more than $100 per session for ambulette or access-a-ride for eligible patients), and the lack of continuation in an ongoing exercise program, leading to relapse and need for retreatment. Additionally, access to physical therapy is limited for many patients since there are not enough available outpatient therapy services to meet the needs of all patients. Finding an alternative exercise program that will increase adherence, decrease total therapy visits, and improve patient's outcomes with decreased dependence on pain medications is a high priority from both patient care and cost management perspectives.

AposTherapy potentially overcomes many of these issues with improving/modifying abnormal biomechanics (therefore decreasing pain), and a home-based exercise program utilizing footwear that causes exercise with normal activity by promoting perturbation. This biomechanical approach may significantly reduce pain and improve function in patients with knee OA. Capitalizing on the reported excellent adherence and clinical benefit of AposTherapy in patients with significant knee OA, the investigators propose to evaluate the biomechanical exercise (wearing an appropriately calibrated shoe at home for a prescribed amount of time each day) as a conservative treatment that may supplement or supplant traditional pain medications, interventional pain procedures and physical therapy in an at-risk urban inner city population with knee OA.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

54

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • Bronx, New York, United States, 10467
        • Montefiore Medical Center - Moses Campus

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

36 years to 71 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients suffering from symptomatic knee OA (uni/bi lateral) for at least six months, fulfilling the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) clinical criteria for OA of the knee, and having radiographically assessed OA of the knee according to the Kellgren and Lawrence scale.
  • Patients with a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score of ≥3cm (measured at baseline).
  • Males and females between the ages of 40-75.
  • 17<BMI<40
  • Ambulatory and active patients that can participate in a rehabilitation program that includes daily walking
  • Stable medical regimen (no recent changes to the pain medication within a month)
  • Able to walk at least 50 meters and scored positive on the STEADI test
  • Able to understand, read and sign the informed consent form
  • English or Spanish speaking

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients suffering from acute septic arthritis.
  • Patients suffering from inflammatory joint disease such as rheumatoid arthritis.
  • Patients with diagnosis of avascular necrosis of the knee.
  • Patients with diagnosis of neuromuscular disease.
  • Patients with more than 3 falls in the last 12 months, OR any fall with an injury in the last 12 months.
  • Patients exhibiting a lack of physical or mental ability to perform or comply with the study procedure.
  • Patients with a history of pathological osteoporotic fracture
  • Patients with referred pain in the knees from back or hip joint symptoms.
  • Patients with severe back pain, ≥ 4 cm in visual analogue scale (0-10) [1] or radiating leg pain
  • Patients with generalized body pain (both upper and lower extremities, such as fibromyalgia
  • No major surgery to the affected limb and contralateral limb (e.g. no joint replacements or surgical fracture repair)
  • No major cardiovascular comorbidities (able to enroll in an active exercise program)
  • Patient started on lipid lowering medication in last 3 months
  • Any change in blood pressure medications
  • No recent physical therapy (no more recent than 6 months) on the affected limb
  • No active heart disease (ischemia or heart failure admissions within 6 months) and no active Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (exacerbation within 6 months)
  • No active malignancies on ongoing treatment
  • Patient with neurological gait pattern
  • Patient requiring assistive device during gait analysis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Traditional Physical Therapy
Participants will have traditional physical therapy up to 20 sessions, up to two sessions per week. This will involve exercise and modalities as decided by the therapists and medical providers. Participants will have a home exercise program for the remainder of the year.
Other: Traditional Physical Therapy
Up to 20 sessions of traditional physical therapy
Experimental: AposTherapy
Participants will have AposTherapy instead of traditional physical therapy over the course of one year. This will include 7 sessions of gait assessment and re-calibration with daily at home exercise with the device over the year.
Device: AposTherapy
AposTherapy is a home-based exercise program utilizing footwear that causes exercise with normal daily activity that may significantly improve function in patients with knee pain in general, and specifically knee osteoarthritis (OA).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Knee Pain and Function
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Improvement in Pain and Function as assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain scale. The WOMAC, a self-administered instrument, is 1 of 3 subscales comprising the WOMAC Index. As a standalone measure, the WOMAC pain scale contains 5 items that address the following person-level activities: walking, using stairs, in bed, sitting or lying down, and standing upright. The stem of the scale asks the patient to focus on the extent of pain experienced in the involved knee during each of these activities which are reported on a 0-4 Likert scale: None (0), Mild (1), Moderate (2), Severe (3), and Extreme (4), with a possible score range of 0-20 for Pain. Higher scores on the WOMAC are associated with worse knee pain.
24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Life by RAND SF-36 (RAND Corporation Short Form 36)
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Health-related Quality of Life (QoL) as assessed using the RAND SF-36 (Short Form Health Survey). The RAND SF-36 is a 36-item patient-reported questionnaire that covers eight health domains: physical functioning (10 items), bodily pain (2 items), role limitations due to physical health problems (4 items), role limitations due to personal or emotional problems (4 items), emotional well-being (5 items), social functioning (2 items), energy/fatigue (4 items), and general health perceptions (5 items). Composite scoring range is 0 to 100 across the 8 domains identified with a higher overall score defining a more favorable health state.
24 weeks
PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Pain Interference and Physical Function
Time Frame: 24 weeks

Pain and Function measured through PROMIS short forms. PROMIS measures specific domains of Physical Health (e.g., physical function, pain intensity, pain interference, fatigue, sleep disturbance); Mental Health (depressive symptoms, anxiety, anger); and Social Health (ability to participate in social roles and activities).

PROMIS measures are scored on the T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. PROMIS domains use different terms to describe score ranges. For example, some domains use mild/moderate/severe whereas others use very high to very low. Cut points for assessment can also vary. For PROMIS measures, higher scores equals more of the concept being measured (e.g., more Fatigue, more Physical Function). Thus a score of 60 is one SD above the average referenced population. This could be a desirable or undesirable outcome.
24 weeks
Gait Assessment
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Objective assessment of the patients' gait assessed with gait analysis equipment. Equipment was used to measure the patients' cadence, or walking rate, in number of steps per minute (steps/min).
24 weeks
6-min Walk Test
Time Frame: 24 weeks
objective assessment using maximum distance comfortably walked in 6 minutes on a 100 foot closed course
24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Montefiore Medical Center

Collaborators

Apos Medical and Sports Technology Ltd.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Matthew Bartels, MD, MPH, Montefiore Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 30, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 21, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 31, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2015-4842

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knee Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Traditional Physical Therapy

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Rwanda

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe