Non-operative Management for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer (NOM)

November 18, 2024 updated by: Mount Sinai Hospital, Canada

Phase II Study to Assess the Safety of Non-operative Management for Low Rectal Cancer

This is a 5 year Phase II study to evaluate the safety of non-operative management (NOM) in patients with low rectal cancer (LRC) who achieve a complete clinical response (cCR) following chemoradiotherapy (CRT). The safety of NOM will be evaluated by assessing (i) rate of local re-growth and (ii) rate of macroscopically positive resection margin (R2) when surgery is required due to local re-growth. NOM will be considered safe or as effective as surgery to achieve local control if the rate of local re-growth is equal to or less than 30% and the rate of a macroscopically positive margin is 0%.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Background: The standard treatment for low rectal cancer (LRC) involving the anal sphincter involves combined, pre-operative chemotherapy and radiotherapy (CRT) followed by surgery. Surgery involves removal of the rectum and anus and creation of a permanent colostomy and has significant long term effects on bowel and sexual function and body image. Because of the high morbidity of surgery, there has been increasing interest in non-operative management (NOM) for LRC. The NOM approach involves deferral of surgery and active surveillance of all patients with LRC who have achieved a complete clinical response (i.e., have no residual tumour) following completion CRT which occurs in approximately 30% of patients. To date, while there have been a few, prospective single institution studies that have shown favourable results with NOM, this approach has not been adopted into clinical practice due to concerns from physicians about the safety of NOM based on the limited evidence available.

Objectives: Therefore, the objective of this study is to conduct a pan-Canadian Phase II trial to assess the safety of NOM for LRC.

Methods: All patients with LRC requiring surgery and a permanent colostomy being treated at the participating centres will be assessed for complete clinical response (cCR) eight to ten weeks following the completion of CRT by the treating surgeon. For the study, a cCR will be defined as (i) no palpable tumour on digital rectal exam, (ii) no residual tumour defined as white-yellow, flat scar on endoscopy, (iii) no residual tumour on MRI, (iv) no suspicious mesorectal or extramesorectal lymph nodes on MRI and (v) normal CEA level. Patients who meet all of these criteria for cCR will be invited to participate in the study. Patients who consent to participate in the study will undergo active surveillance that will include DRE, endoscopy and pelvic MRI every 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months; CEA levels every 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24 months and CT chest/abdomen and pelvis every 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. The primary outcome for the study will be the rate of local re-growth 2 years following the completion of CRT. Local re-growth will be defined as failure to meet the cCR criteria at any time point. NOM will be considered safe, if the rate of local re-growth is less than 30% two years after the completion of CRT. The secondary outcomes for the study will be the rate of distant recurrence, disease free and overall survival at 2 years.

Significance: The results of this study will be highly clinically relevant since it is expected that NOM for LRC will be safe and will have significant potential to change clinical practice in Canada and North America since approximately 30% of patients with LRC would be able to safely avoid surgery and a permanent colostomy and have improved bowel and sexual function and body image. Furthermore, widespread adoption of NOM has the potential to increase health care capacity and decrease treatment costs by reducing the number of surgeries, hospital admissions and costs associated with both surgery and long term surgical morbidity.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5T 3L9
        • Recruiting
        • Sinai Health System
        • Contact:
          • Erin Kennedy

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Completed chemoradiotherapy (CRT) as standard of care [Stage II and Stage III (T3-T4N0, AnyTN1-2)]; [50 Gy (2 Gy x 25 fractions) with 5-FU or capecitabine]
  • Planned or probable APR
  • ALL criteria for complete clinical response are met between 8 and 10 weeks following completion of CRT
  • 18 years or older
  • Provides written consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to undergo MRI
  • Metastatic disease (including extramesorectal and retroperitoneal lymph nodes)
  • Pregnancy
  • Inflammatory bowel disease
  • More than one primary colorectal cancer
  • Other malignancy within 5 years of treatment for current rectal cancer
  • Unfit for surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: non-operative management
Patients with low rectal cancer who have achieved a complete clinical response following chemoradiotherapy will undergo active follow-up with regular clinical visits, physical exam, endoscopy and imaging assessments at regular intervals for 2 years to assess for tumour re-growth or spread to the liver and lungs
Patients who are eligible and provide informed consent to participate in the trial will undergo non-operative management (i.e., active surveillance for 24 months) according to the schedule outlined in the study protocol.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of local re-growth
Time Frame: 2 years
The safety of non-operative management will be evaluated by assessing the rate of local re-growth in the study population. This approach will be considered safe if the local re-growth rate is equal to or less than 30%.
2 years
Rate of macroscopically positive resection margin
Time Frame: 2 years
The safety of non-operative management will be evaluated by assessing the rate of macroscopically positive resection margin following surgery in the study population. This approach will be considered safe if the rate is 0%.
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of overall survival
Time Frame: 2 years
Rate of overall survival in the study population assessed 2 years after completion of CRT
2 years
Rate of disease-free survival
Time Frame: 2 years
Rate of disease-free survival in the study population assessed 2 years after completion of CRT
2 years
Colostomy-free survival
Time Frame: 2 years
Rate of colostomy-free survival in the study population assessed 2 years after completion of CRT
2 years
Quality of Life
Time Frame: 6, 12, 24 months
Quality of life will be measured using the EORTC C30 questionnaire and will be assessed at 6, 12 and 24 months.
6, 12, 24 months
Bowel Function
Time Frame: 6, 12, 24 months
Bowel function will be measured using the MSKCC Bowel Function Instrument and will be assessed at 6, 12 and 24 months.
6, 12, 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Erin Kennedy, Sinai Health System

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 16, 2018

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 12, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 5, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

June 7, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 20, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rectal Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on Non-operative management

Subscribe