Heart Failure Study of Multi-site Pacing Effects on Ventriculoarterial Coupling (HUMVEE)

September 10, 2020 updated by: Polychronis Dilaveris, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
To perform a comparative study of multi-site left ventricular pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy effects on ventriculoarterial coupling and energy efficiency of the failing heart

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Given that the main function of the cardiovascular system is to provide sufficient blood supply to tissues in order to ensure their normal and effective function, combined with the most efficient possible use of energy produced by ATP degradation, there has been a keen interest in elucidating the interplay between heart and vessels, critically affecting both.

In order to achieve these goals, it is thought that in healthy humans the cardiovascular system as a unity operates at a unique combination of parameters (arterial elastance, heart rate and left ventricular end systolic elastance) so as to:

  1. Maximize stroke work (SW) for a given left ventricular contractility. This is related to the fact that adequate tissue perfusion is dependent both on stroke volume and on pressure and in fluid dynamics W=∆P×∆V (thus maximizing SW leads to optimal perfusion), OR
  2. Optimize energy efficiency of the heart, in terms of energy transferred to the arterial bed to total mechanical energy.

Ventriculoarterial coupling (VAC) is a composite parameter, defined as the ratio of arterial elastance (Ea) to end systolic left ventricular elastance (Ees). Thus: VAC=Ea/Ees . It is a fundamental property of the cardiovascular system, integrating and assessing the interaction of all individual parameters of the ventricle (pump) and the arterial tree (afterload). Furthermore, VAC may assess both whether SW produced is maximal for a given contractility of the left ventricle (condition for maximization: VAC=1) and whether mechanical efficiency of the ventricle is optimal (optimization condition: VAC=0.5-0.7). Consequently, simultaneous optimization is not possible, and the cardiovascular system operates either at maximal output (as in healthy individuals at rest) or at optimal efficiency (healthy individuals at exercise). Multi-site pacing (MSP) of the left ventricle is a recently introduced technique with excellent studies' findings concerning echocardiographic parameters of ventricular function. Recently, the MultiPoint Pacing (MPP) IDE study showed that a specific choice of electrical dipole for the first left ventricular pulse and a close to simultaneous application of the two left ventricular pulses achieves a very high percent of clinical response (87%), with excellent patient safety. Subsequent studies confirmed these findings, reporting even higher NYHA response rates (95% vs 78% for conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy - CRT).

The underlying rationale lies in the better approximation of the normal sequence of left ventricular activation, through use of two, instead of a single, pulses. According to trial results, one can achieve, compared to conventional CRT, improved coordination between left ventricular segments, improved cardiac output and, possibly, tissue perfusion, and potentially reduction of arrhythmia propensity (mechanism similar to that of CRT). Thus, it would be interesting to study whether these can be independently confirmed by changes in VAC values. In heart failure, VAC values increase considerably due to increases in Ea as a result of the feedback loop regarding pressure (but not volume) maintenance. As a consequence, any reduction would move them closed to both 1 and the 0.5-0.7 area, yielding improvement in both SW maximization and efficiency optimization.

However, there are objective difficulties in achieving lege artis MSP (according to MPP-IDE study standards) given that two prerequisites must be met: 1. Interpolar distance for the first left ventricular pulse >30mm (i.e. non-sequential poles used), 2. Nearly simultaneous (Δt=5msec) left ventricular pulses and 3. Threshold of ≤3.5V@0.5msec.

Moreover, the first pulse should, ideally, be directed to the most delayed, compared to the normal activation sequence, viable myocardial segment, a feat not always possible due to electrode placing constraints. Obviously, presence of scar could alter the course and shape of the activation front and thus diminish its effects (similar to issues already discussed in the case of CRT).

Objective:

To perform a comparative study of multi-site left ventricular pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy effects on ventriculoarterial coupling and energy efficiency of the failing heart

Hypothesis:

VAC values are improved (shift closer to unity/0.5-0.7 area) and work/efficiency increase with patients on MSP as compared to CRT pacing.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Attiki
      • Athens, Attiki, Greece, 11527
        • First Department of Cardiology, Hippokration General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Systolic heart failure with an ejection fraction of 35% or less, at NYHA functional class of II or worse, and a QRS displaying either LBBB morphology and >120msec or non-LBBB morphology and >150msec.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult (>18 years of age), consenting patients
  • Any cardiomyopathy type and
  • An existing I/IIa indication for a CRT-D device

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those with a class IIb CRT indication
  • Those where thresholds of <3.5V@0.5msec cannot be achieved in at least two dipoles of the left pacing electrode
  • Those where no dipole with a distance between poles of 30mm can be detected
  • Those with >2/4 (moderate to severe - severe) mitral/aortic insufficiency, rendering noninvasive VAC calculation unreliable.
  • Finally, contraindication to receiving intravenous paramagnetic contrast (gadolinium) will also constitute grounds for exclusion.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Crossover
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Heart failure patients eligible for CRT

Adult, consenting patients with any cardiomyopathy type and an existing I/IIa indication for a CRT-D device will receive a device with multi-site pacing capability. Initially, for 6 months, optimal, conventional, resynchronization therapy will be delivered. Following this, all patients will crossover to optimized multi-site pacing, and receive this therapy for 6 more months. Optimization of therapy will be determined based on maximization of cardiac output, i.e. maximization of left ventricular outflow tract velocity-time integral.

Baseline measurements of serum creatinine and ventriculoarterial coupling will also be acquired.

Instead of administering a single LV pulse at the most (electrically) delayed segment of the ventricle, multi-site pacing allows for a more detailed "sculpting" of the LV activation sequence. Based on the MPP-IDE study results, activation of the antero-lateral wall, or at least its most delayed segments, closely followed by a pulse to the apex and then by a right ventricular one will yield favorable results in terms of hemodynamics and clinical parameters.

Programming features:

  • Interpolar distance for the first left ventricular pulse >30mm (i.e. non-sequential poles used)
  • Nearly simultaneous (Δt=5msec) second left ventricular pulse and
  • Threshold of ≤3.5V@0.5msec

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement of ventriculoarterial coupling
Time Frame: 6 months for each intervention (conventional CRT - MPP)
Ventriculoarterial coupling value shifts closer to 1
6 months for each intervention (conventional CRT - MPP)
Improvement of energy efficiency
Time Frame: 6 months for each intervention (conventional CRT - MPP)
Energy efficiency improvement will be assessed by means of ventriculoarterial coupling value shifts closer to 0.7
6 months for each intervention (conventional CRT - MPP)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement in renal function
Time Frame: 6 months for each intervention (conventional CRT - MPP)
Creatinine clearance (Cockcroft-Gault formula) increases
6 months for each intervention (conventional CRT - MPP)
Improvement in percent maximal stroke work
Time Frame: 6 months for each intervention (conventional CRT - MPP)
Calculated through use of ventriculoarterial coupling
6 months for each intervention (conventional CRT - MPP)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 18, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 12, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

June 16, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 11, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 10, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Activation of multi-site pacing capability on CRT devices

3
Subscribe