Study of Cingal™ for the Relief of Knee Osteoarthritis Compared to Triamcinolone Hexacetonide

February 23, 2022 updated by: Anika Therapeutics, Inc.

Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Comparator Controlled, Multi-Center Study of a Single Injection Cross-Linked Sodium Hyaluronate Combined With Triamcinolone Hexacetonide (Cingal™) to Provide Symptomatic Relief of Osteoarthritis of the Knee

This is a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, active comparator controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single injection of Cingal for the relief of joint pain in subjects with OA of the knee.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Cingal 16-02 is a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, active comparator controlled study designed to evaluate the relative contributions of the individual constituents (Hyaluronic Acid and Triamcinolone Hexacetonide) in the Cingal combination product to pain relief as measured by the change in WOMAC Pain from baseline through 26 weeks.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

576

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Budapest, Hungary, 1051
        • Health Center of Downtown-Lipotvaros, Orthopedic Outpatient Clinic (Belvárosi-Lipótvárosi Egészségügyi Szolgálat Ortopeadia)
      • Budapest, Hungary, 1134
        • Magyar Honvedseg
      • Budapest, Hungary, 29-41
        • Uzsoki Utcai Kórház
      • Budapest,, Hungary
        • Baleseti Központ
      • Debrecen, Hungary
        • DE KK Ortopediai Klinika
      • Kecskemét, Hungary, 6000
        • Jutrix Medical Llc
      • Kiskunfélegyháza, Hungary, 6100
        • Medidea Bt.
      • Tata, Hungary, 2890
        • Kastelypark Klinka
      • Białystok, Poland
        • Zdrowie Osteo-Medic
      • Bielsko-Biała, Poland
        • Szpital Świętego Łukasza S.A.
      • Gliwice, Poland
        • NZOZ Medi Spatz
      • Kielce, Poland
        • ARTIMED Niepubliczny Zakład Opieki Zdrowotnej
      • Kraków, Poland
        • Centrum Medyczne 4M Plus
      • Toruń, Poland
        • NOVAMED Jackowiak Krajewski Spółka Jawna
      • Warsaw, Poland
        • Centrum Medyczne Amed Warszawa Targowek
      • Warsaw, Poland
        • ETG Network, Warsaw
      • Warsaw, Poland
        • ETG Network
      • Łódź, Poland
        • Medical University of Lodz
      • Świdnik,, Poland
        • Lubelskie Centrum Diagnostyczne

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Screening Inclusion Criteria

  1. Subject is 40-75 years old, with a Body Mass Index (BMI) ≤ 40 kg/m2.
  2. Subject has Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) severity grade I, II or III in the index knee as determined by X-ray. Contralateral knee: K-L severity grade 0, I or II.
  3. Subject has had at least two signs and at least two symptoms of OA disease (based on the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for diagnosing knee OA) in the index knee for at least 6 months despite conservative treatment (weight reduction, physical therapy, pain medications, etc.). The EULAR signs and symptoms are as follows:

    • Signs: crepitus, restricted movement and bony enlargement
    • Symptoms: persistent knee pain, limited morning stiffness and reduced function
  4. Subject must be willing to abstain from other IA treatments of the knee for the duration of the study.
  5. Subject is willing to discontinue all analgesics including NSAIDs, except acetaminophen/paracetamol, at least seven days before the treatment injection and through the completion of the study.
  6. Subject is willing to use only acetaminophen/paracetamol (up to a maximum of 4.0 grams per day per the package insert) for the treatment of joint pain for the duration of the study. At least forty eight hours prior to the Baseline Visit and each follow-up visit, the subject is willing to discontinue use of acetaminophen/paracetamol.
  7. Subject is willing to maintain a stable dose of oral glucosamine and/or chondroitin sulfate products throughout the study, if taken prior to signing the informed consent form (ICF).
  8. Subject is able to understand and comply with the requirements of the study and voluntarily provides consent.

Screening Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject received an IA injection of Hyaluronic Acid (HA) and/or steroid in either knee within 6 months of signing the informed consent form (ICF). A subject will be excluded if they are planning to receive an HA or steroid injection (other than the study injection) in either knee during the course of this study.
  2. Subject had an arthroscopy of either knee within 3 months of signing the ICF.
  3. Subject had an open surgical procedure of either knee or hip or any surgery of the spine within 12 months of signing ICF. Subject plans to have knee, hip or spine surgery within the study period.
  4. Subject has intra-articular trauma to the index knee. Subject has concurrent multi-system or multi-limb trauma.
  5. Subject has evidence or medical history of the following diseases in the index knee: septic arthritis; inflammatory joint disease; history of Reiter's syndrome; gout; chondrocalcinosis associated with recurrent episodes of acute synovitis of the knee consistent with pseudogout; osteochondritis dissecans, Paget disease of the bone; ochronosis; acromegaly; hemochromatosis; primary osteochondromatosis; known history of Wilson disease; heritable disorders or collagen gene mutations.
  6. Subject has a history of cartilage repair surgery in the index knee within 3 years of signing the ICF.
  7. Subject has a history of ACL repair, reconstruction or injury in the index knee within 3 years of signing the ICF.
  8. Subject has X-ray findings of acute fractures, severe bone loss, avascular necrosis, severe bone or joint deformity in the index knee.
  9. Subject has significant varus or valgus deformity greater than 10 degrees in either knee.
  10. Subject has a clinically apparent tense effusion of the index knee.
  11. Subject has knee instability in either knee per the Investigator's assessment.
  12. Subject requires consistent use of an assistive device (e.g. wheelchair, walker, etc.) Occasional use of a cane is acceptable.
  13. Subject has medical condition(s) which could affect study assessments or may adversely affect the safety and/or success of the study treatment. This includes but is not limited to the following: a. Peripheral neuropathy severe enough to interfere with evaluation of the subject, b. Vascular insufficiency severe enough to interfere with evaluation of the subject, c. Active fibromyalgia, d. Hemiparesis involving either lower extremity, e. Immunocompromised or immunosuppressive disorder or receiving medications to treat immunosuppressive disorders, f. Systemic bleeding disorder(s), g. Current malignancy or treatment within the last 5 years, except for non-melanoma skin cancer, h. Significant psychiatric disorder, i. Active drug and/or alcohol abuse within the past year, j. Uncontrolled diabetes with a screening HbA1c of >7%.
  14. Subject is taking medications at the time the subjects signs the ICF which could interfere with the treatment procedure, healing and/or assessments. This includes but is not limited to oral or injectable anticoagulant treatments, anti-aggregant platelet treatment, chronic opioid analgesics. Low dose aspirin used for cardiovascular protection is allowed if a stable regimen is maintained for the duration of the study.
  15. Subject is receiving treatment using electromagnetic stimulation and/or low intensity ultrasound in the index knee at the time of signing the ICF, within 3 months of signing the ICF or plans to receive treatment any time during the study period.
  16. Subjects who had an oral, intramuscular, intravenous, rectal suppository or topical (excluded in index knee only) corticosteroid within 30 days of signing the ICF are excluded. Topical corticosteroid use at any site other than the index knee is allowed.
  17. Subject has a pre-treatment contraindication to IA injections or aspiration of the index knee, including cutaneous infection in the injection site area, active IA infection (as suggested by moderate or marked effusion), knee deformity or condition which, in the opinion of the Investigator could jeopardize the sterility or delivery of the IA injection.
  18. Subjects with a history of hypersensitivity to any of the ingredients in the hyaluronan or previous hypersensitivity to the administration of corticosteroids or an inability to tolerate acetaminophen/paracetamol.
  19. Subject has any contraindication to the receipt of a corticosteroid.
  20. Subject is receiving or in litigation for worker's compensation.
  21. Subject is a woman who is pregnant or breastfeeding at the Screening Visit or a woman of child bearing potential who refuses to use effective contraception during the course of the study.
  22. Subject was involved in any other research study involving an investigational product, or a new application of an approved product, within 60 days of signing the ICF.

Baseline Inclusion Criteria:

1. Subject has a Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain-sub-score ≥ 40 mm and ≤ 90 mm in the affected knee and ≤ 30 mm in the contralateral knee on a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scale.

Baseline Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject has a decrease of ≥ 20 mm in the WOMAC pain-sub-score (average of 5 pain scales) from Screening to Baseline in the index knee on a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scale.
  2. Subject has a synovial fluid aspirate volume > 20 mL in the index knee.
  3. Subject has a contraindication to continue with the study treatment injection based on the visual appearance of the synovial fluid aspirate unless the fluid is examined microscopically prior to injection with no clinically significant findings (e.g. bacteria, crystals or blood).
  4. Subject has range of motion of less than 100° flexion in either knee.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cingal
Cingal is a combination product consisting of 88 milligrams of cross-linked HA (hyaluronic acid) with 18 milligrams of TH (triamcinolone hexacetonide) in a 4 milliliter (mL) intra-articular injection.
Hyaluronic Acid with Triamcinolone Hexacetonide
Other Names:
  • HA + TH
Active Comparator: Monovisc
Monovisc is a device that consists of 88 milligrams of cross-linked HA (hyaluronic acid) in a 4 milliliter (mL) intra-articular injection.
Hyaluronic acid
Other Names:
  • HA
Active Comparator: Triamcinolone Hexacetonide (TH)
Triamcinolone hexacetonide (TH) is a corticosteroid supplied in a 20 milligram per 1 milliliter (20 mg/mL) intra-articular injection.
Triamcinolone Hexacetonide
Other Names:
  • TH

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Score at 26 Weeks (ITT Population)
Time Frame: 26 weeks
The change from baseline in knee pain as measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Score comparing the Cingal group to the TH group. The WOMAC Pain Score is a validated visual analog scale from 0 mm = no pain to 100 mm = highest pain level. A negative number for the change from baseline indicates reduction in pain. A greater negative difference from baseline means a better outcome.
26 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Score at 3 Weeks (ITT Population)
Time Frame: 3 weeks
The change from baseline in knee pain as measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Score comparing the Cingal group to the Monovisc group. The WOMAC Pain Score is a validated visual analog scale from 0 mm = no pain to 100 mm = highest pain level. A negative number for the change from baseline indicates reduction in pain. A greater negative difference from baseline means a better outcome.
3 weeks
OMERACT-OARSI Responder Index at 26 Weeks Post Treatment Comparing the Cingal Group to the TH Group (ITT Population)
Time Frame: 26 weeks
The responder rate as identified by the Outcomes Measures for Rheumatic Arthritis Clinical Trials-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) responder index at 26 weeks post treatment comparing the Cingal® group to the TH group. The OMERACT-OARSI responder index is a proportion of subjects that met the criteria to be a responder.
26 weeks
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Physical Function Score at 26 Weeks (ITT Population)
Time Frame: 26 weeks
The change from baseline of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Score comparing the Cingal and TH arms (ITT Population). The WOMAC Physical Function Score is a validated visual analog scale from 0 = no limitations in function to 100 mm = highest limitations in function. A negative number for the change from baseline indicates improvement in physical function. A greater negative difference from baseline means a better outcome.
26 weeks
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Score at 26 Weeks (ITT Population)
Time Frame: 26 weeks
The change from baseline in knee stiffness as measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Score comparing the Cingal group to the TH group. The WOMAC Stiffness Score is a validated visual analog scale from 0 = no stiffness to 100 = highest stiffness level. A negative number for the change from baseline indicates reduction in knee stiffness. A greater negative difference from baseline means a better outcome.
26 weeks
Change From Baseline in Total WOMAC Score at 26 Weeks (ITT Population)
Time Frame: 26 weeks
The change from baseline in Total Score as measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) comparing the Cingal group to the TH group. The Total WOMAC Score combines the three 0-to-100 point scores from the WOMAC Pain Score, the WOMAC Stiffness Score, and the WOMAC Physical Function Score for a Total Score from 0 = no symptoms to 300 = highest degrees of pain, stiffness, and functional limitation symptoms. A negative number for the change from baseline indicates reduction in pain, stiffness and function limitations. A greater negative difference from baseline means a better outcome.
26 weeks
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment at 26 Weeks (ITT Population)
Time Frame: 26 weeks
The change from baseline in the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) between the Cingal and TH arms (ITT population). The PGA is completed by the subject answering the question "Considering all the ways the osteoarthritis in your index knee bothers you, what is your assessment of how much your knee is bothering you today?" The PGA is scored on a visual analog scale, where 0 = the patient is not bothered to 100 mm = the patient is bothered to the highest degree. A negative number for the change from baseline indicates an improvement in the patient assessment. A greater negative difference means a better outcome.
26 weeks
Change From Baseline in the Evaluator Global Assessment at 26 Weeks (ITT Population)
Time Frame: 26 weeks
The change from baseline in the Evaluator Global Assessment between the Cingal and TH arms (ITT population). The Evaluator Global Assessment is completed by the Blinded Outcomes Assessor, and answers the question "Considering all the ways the osteoarthritis in the patient's index knee bothers him/her, what is your assessment of how much the patient's knee is bothering him/her today?" The Evaluator Global Assessment is scored on a visual analog scale where 0 = the patient is not bothered, to 100 mm = the patient is bothered to the highest degree. A negative number for the change from baseline indicates improvement in the assessment. A greater negative difference means a better outcome.
26 weeks
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Score at 1 Week (ITT Population)
Time Frame: 1 week
The change from baseline in knee pain as measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Score comparing the Cingal group to the Monovisc group. The WOMAC Pain Score is a validated visual analog scale from 0 mm = no pain to 100 mm = highest pain level. A negative number for the change from baseline indicates reduction in pain. A greater negative difference from baseline means a better outcome.
1 week
The Usage of Rescue Medication (Acetaminophen) Through 26 Weeks (ITT Population)
Time Frame: 26 weeks
The usage of rescue medication (acetominophen) through 26 weeks post treatment in the Cingal group compared to the TH group using the ITT population.
26 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Score at 3 Weeks in the Per-Protocol Population
Time Frame: 3 Weeks
The change from baseline in knee pain as measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Score comparing the Cingal group to the Monovisc group. The WOMAC Pain Score is a validated visual analog scale from 0 mm = no pain to 100 mm = highest pain level. A negative number for the change from baseline indicates reduction in pain. A greater negative difference from baseline means a better outcome.
3 Weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Laszlo Hangody, MD, Uzsoki Hospital, Department of Traumatology

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 25, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 23, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

April 23, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 16, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 16, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

June 19, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 24, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

There is no plan to make individual participant data available to other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knee Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Cingal

3
Subscribe