Usefulness of a Visual Analogue Scale to Evaluate Anxiety in the Painful Hospitalized Patient (EVANX)

March 21, 2019 updated by: Lille Catholic University
Today, there is no simple tool for measuring patient anxiety. The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the ability of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to measure anxiety in painful hospitalized patients, and to correlate it to STAI-Ya and HAD-7A auto questionnaires.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Pain is one of the major signs, if not the first, which encourages patient to call caregivers. It is a complex and multidimensional sensorial experience. An optimal pain management should consider these different dimensions. If not, the risk is to misidentify pain causes, resulting in therapeutic failures.

Anxiety is one of these dimensions. It's an emotional factor particularly frequent in hospitalized patient.

Pain and hospitalization are both sources of anxiety. Anxiety causes discomfort, hyper vigilance reactions and pain focusing; it can cause avoidance behavior and non-compliance with prescribed medical treatments. Specific care of anxiety can result in a positive impact on hospitalized patient's pains and comfort.

Screening tools for anxiety exist. The STAI-Y is the actual reference scale to measure anxiety. The "Ya" version measures anxiety linked with the reactional state. It's composed of 20 questions and scores of 45 and higher define a significant anxiety (at least moderate). Another tool, the HAD scale, measures anxiety and depression. It has been validated on a population of hospitalized patients. It's composed of 14 questions including 7 about anxiety (HAD-7A). An 11 and higher score defines a significant anxiety (at least moderate). But these tools, theoretically accessible to caregivers, are not often used, especially in hospitalization. The principal reason is their inadequacy to the real conditions in services. Their utilization is too restrictive to hope for an exhaustive diagnosis in routine clinical practice (e.g. the need to have a specific support at disposal or the time to fill in the auto-questionnaires). It would be particularly pertinent to have a faster and easier tool at disposal.

Studies suggest the usefulness of the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to measure anxiety in pre-operatory or pre-interventional context. This study aims at evaluating VAS' interest in a very frequent situation, the one of painful hospitalized patient. If the VAS demonstrates its capacity to detect and measure anxiety as the validated scales, its utilization could be proposed at the same time as VAS for pain. When pain is assessed by VAS, it'd be easy and simple to evaluate anxiety with the anxiety-VAS, with the same tool, systematically or in anxiety identified situations. Anxious patients who could have specific treatments for anxiety would be better detected and cared for in a general way in accordance with good practice recommendations.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

406

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Roubaix, France, 59100
        • Roubaix hospital
      • Tourcoing, France, 59200
        • Tourcoing Hospital
      • Wattrelos, France, 59150
        • Wattrelos hospital
    • Nord
      • Lille, Nord, France, 59462
        • Lille Catholic Hospitals

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Painful hospitalized patient

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged ≥ 18 years old
  • Patient hospitalized in a medical or chirurgical service.
  • Patient presenting a moderate to acute pain (Pain VAS ≥4)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient unable to fill in the auto questionnaire
  • Refusal, unwillingness of the patient to participate to the study
  • Patients under guardianship, trusteeship and judicial protection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Painful hospitalized patient
The anxiety of those patients will be measured with an Anxiety VAS
Anxiety will be measure with a 10-points visual analogic scale (VAS)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation between Anxiety VAS and STAI-Ya and HAD-7A scores
Time Frame: at inclusion
Correlation between Anxiety-VAS and STAI-Ya, HAD-7A scores.
at inclusion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patients presenting anxiety.
Time Frame: at inclusion
Number of patients presenting significant anxiety according to the different scales used.
at inclusion
Link between anxiety scores and several factors
Time Frame: at inclusion
The link between the scores at the different anxiety scales and the following factors will be assessed : age, gender, study level, prior hospitalization, antecedent of anxiety-depressive symptoms, treatment, hospitalisation services, reason for hospitalisation, time between hospitalisation and inclusion, painful care, pain origin and pain history
at inclusion
Concordance between STAI-Ya and HAD-7A scales.
Time Frame: at inclusion
Correlation between STAI-Ya and HAD-7A scores.
at inclusion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Vincent Ducoulombier, MD, Lille Catholic University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 7, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 19, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 20, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

June 21, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 22, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • OBS-0024
  • 2017-A00482-51 (Other Identifier: ANSM)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Anxiety VAS

3
Subscribe