Comparison of Craniosacral Therapy vs Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy

July 7, 2017 updated by: CentraState Medical Center

A Comparison of Craniosacral Therapy vs Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction in People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Pilot Study

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of CST for the treatment of LUTS in patients with MS and evaluate the acute effects compared to PFPT.

A. Objectives To examine the effect of CST as compared to PFPT on QOL, SEMG resting biofeedback readings, and PVR ultrasonography measures in patients with MS and LUTS.

B. Hypotheses / Research Question(s) It is hypothesized that patients who receive CST will demonstrate improved QOL, bladder control and ability to empty bladder as compared to those who receive PFPT.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to determine if Craniosacral Therapy is an effective therapy for treating bladder dysfunction in patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS). It will be compared to standard care for the treatment of bladder dysfunction, which is Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy. Bladder dysfunctions are extremely common in patients with Multiple Sclerosis. One of the most common symptoms of bladder dysfunction is called over-active bladder. Over- active bladder can be described by increased urges to urinate and frequency of urination, especially at night. Other common symptoms are: leakage of urine, with or without activity; inability to hold urine; and a decreased ability to empty bladder when urinating.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New Jersey
      • Freehold, New Jersey, United States, 07728
        • Recruiting
        • CentraState Medical Center
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Danielle T Robbins, DPT
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Emily Bessemer, DPT
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Deborah Pearce, DPT
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Ilyasah Byfield, MSN

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis
  • Currently have the following symptoms for at least three (3) months or longer: frequent urination, increased urge to urinate, nighttime urination, loss/leakage of urine with or without activity, and/or problems emptying your bladder.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable or unwilling to give consent to be treated
  • Unable or unwilling to cover your portion of physical therapy treatment (i.e. co-pays and/or deductibles)
  • Cannot speak or read English
  • Have NOT had any urinary symptoms for at least three (3) months
  • Do not have Multiple Sclerosis; or have NOT been diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis
  • Take medication to treat your urinary symptoms; or have taken medication in the past three (3) months to treat your urinary symptoms
  • Use an indwelling catheter (i.e. tube inserted into your bladder for continuous urine drainage); or you require intermittent catheterization
  • Currently are experiencing any of the following: shooting or radiating pain in your back or abdomen; pain that is not relieved with body position and/or medication; nausea; decreased appetite; pain with bowel movements or urination; and/or any symptom that is new and/or of unexplained onset (i.e. you do not know why it started or when it started)
  • Currently have cancer/tumors (i.e. tumors in the spine, brain, pelvis, etc.) and/or aneurysms (i.e. abdominal aortic aneurysm)
  • Received Botox injections in the past three (3) months
  • Received Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy and/or Craniosacral Therapy in the past three (3) months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy
PFPT group will be treated/educated with/on therapeutic exercise, which includes, but not limited to, the pelvic brace, pelvic floor muscle exercise, and diaphragmatic breathing. If the patient is presenting with hypertonia of lower extremity muscles and/or muscles connecting to or part of the pelvic floor, the patient may be instructed on gentle static stretching and/or treated with passive stretching and diaphragmatic breathing.
Educating the PFPT group on therapeutic exercise, which includes, but not limited to, the pelvic brace, pelvic floor muscle exercise, and diaphragmatic breathing. If the patient is presenting with hypertonia of lower extremity muscles and/or muscles connecting to or part of the pelvic floor, the patient may be instructed on gentle static stretching and/or treated with passive stretching and diaphragmatic breathing.
Other Names:
  • Pelvic floor muscle training
  • Bladder training
  • Prompted voiding
Active Comparator: CranioSacral Therapy
Modified Upledger Institute 10-step protocol. Sequence of hand placements (for this protocol)/type of intervention which will mirror many of the treatment sequences described in the systematic review by Jakel and von Hauenschild (2012).
Modified Upledger Institute 10-step protocol.
Other Names:
  • Osteopathic manipulation
  • Visceral manipulation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PFDI-20
Time Frame: Change from baseline PFDI-20 after six weeks of intervention
Pelvic floor distress inventory self-report questionnaire
Change from baseline PFDI-20 after six weeks of intervention
PFIQ-7
Time Frame: Change from baseline PFIQ-7 after six weeks of intervention
Pelvic floor incontinence questionnaire self-report
Change from baseline PFIQ-7 after six weeks of intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MSQOL-54
Time Frame: Change from baseline MSQOL-54 after six weeks of intervention
Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life self-report questionnaire
Change from baseline MSQOL-54 after six weeks of intervention
Post void residual volume
Time Frame: Change from baseline PVR after six weeks of intervention
PVR measurement
Change from baseline PVR after six weeks of intervention
Resting SEMG
Time Frame: Change from baseline Resting SEMG after six weeks of intervention
surface electromyographic reading, resting only
Change from baseline Resting SEMG after six weeks of intervention
Systolic BP
Time Frame: Change from baseline Systolic BP after six weeks of intervention
blood pressure
Change from baseline Systolic BP after six weeks of intervention
Systolic BP
Time Frame: Change from pre-intervention to post-intervention at each of six intervention sessions
blood pressure
Change from pre-intervention to post-intervention at each of six intervention sessions
Diastolic BP
Time Frame: Change from baseline Diastolic BP after six weeks of intervention
blood pressure
Change from baseline Diastolic BP after six weeks of intervention
Diastolic BP
Time Frame: Change from pre-intervention to post-intervention at each of six intervention sessions
blood pressure
Change from pre-intervention to post-intervention at each of six intervention sessions
Pulse
Time Frame: Change from pre-intervention to post-intervention at each of six intervention sessions
pulse
Change from pre-intervention to post-intervention at each of six intervention sessions
Pulse
Time Frame: Change from baseline Pulse after six weeks of intervention
pulse
Change from baseline Pulse after six weeks of intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Danielle T Robbins, DPT, CentraState Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 10, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 9, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 9, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 17, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 7, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 7, 2017

Last Verified

July 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy

Subscribe