Emergency Department Utilization in Germany (INDEED)

July 19, 2017 updated by: Martin Moeckel, Charite University, Berlin, Germany

Utilization and Trans-sectoral Patterns of Care for Patients Admitted to Emergency Departments in Germany

The overall aim of INDEED is to facilitate trans-sectoral and interdisciplinary health services research of emergency care in Germany.

Clinical hospital data from 15 to 20 emergency departments in Germany will be linked to routine ambulatory health care data provided by the Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (Kassenärztliche Vereinigung, KV). INDEED will identify health care gaps and inadequate resource allocation as well as develop strategies for adaptations of the health care system to existing demands.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

B a c k g r o u n d:

Emergency departments nationally and internationally are challenged by a continuously increasing number and complexity of patients and consequent crowding. International studies showed that crowding is associated with unfavourable outcomes. Emergency departments are an important interface between the outpatient and inpatient health care sectors. Health care sectors in Germany are not organisationally cross-linked and data linkage for analysis of the health care system is not generally performed. Hence, there is a lack of data to trans-sectorally describe and monitor patients' pathways and patterns of care in the health care system.

RESEARCH AIMS:

The overall aim of INDEED is to facilitate trans-sectoral and interdisciplinary health services research of emergency care in Germany.

The primary objective of the project is to assess the trans-sectoral utilization of health care services of patients 2 years prior and 1 year after treatment in an emergency department. Patterns of adequate, inadequate and potentially avoidable care will be examined.

The secondary aim is to identify patient clusters with comparable needs of health care provision. Within clusters and for all patients combined INDEED will examine health care needs and gaps as well as factors that influence emergency department visits, disease progression, comorbidities and mortality.

METHODS:

Clinical hospital data from 15 to 20 emergency departments in Germany will be linked to routine ambulatory health care data provided by the Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (Kassenärztliche Vereinigung, KV).

A secondary data analysis of linked routinely collected hospital information system and health insurance data of all adult patients that were treated with any condition in one of the participating emergency departments in 2016 (n≈680.000 cases) will be performed. Data analysis will cover the pattern of utilization of health care, identification of subgroups with comparable need of health care provision, of factors that influence emergency department visits and factors for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC) or inpatient treatment. Study results will be evaluated considering age, multimorbidity and gender aspects as well as the health system and health economic perspective. Thereby INDEED will identify health care gaps and inadequate resource allocation as well as develop strategies for adaptations of the health care system to existing demands.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

680000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients with public health insurance who attended one of the participating EDs in 2016 will be included in this research Project.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult ED patients who attended one of the participating EDs in 2016
  • patients with public health insurance

Exclusion Criteria:

  • no exclusion criteria are applied

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
adult Emergency Department Patients
adult patients that were treated with any condition in one of the participating emergency departments in 2016 (n≈680.000 cases)
No Special interventions except from data extraction form the respective routine data sources are planned .

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prevalence of adequate, inadequate and avoidable ED-visits
Time Frame: Baseline
Prevalence of adequate, inadequate and avoidable ED-visits will be operationalized by a) patients with low utilization of primary health care, b) low urgency, c) preventable conditions, d) chronic diseases that could have been adequately controlled, e) frequent-users, f) patients without contact to a physician in the ED ("left without being seen").
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Characterization of health care resource utilization before and after an ED-visit
Time Frame: from 2 years before until 1 year after ED-visit (2014-2017)
Descriptive analysis of number of visits to primary care physicians before and after the ED visit. The utilization of primary health care will be assessed two years before and one year after the year of the ED visit. ED-visits will be analyzed for the year 2016, this outcome measure will be analyzed for the years 2014-2017.
from 2 years before until 1 year after ED-visit (2014-2017)
influencing factors on avoidable ED-visits
Time Frame: from 2 years before until 1 year after ED-visit (2014-2017)
influencing factors: sex, age, number of contacts to primary care physician, day and time of ED-admission, diagnoses, medication, admission mode, urgency.
from 2 years before until 1 year after ED-visit (2014-2017)
influencing factors on adequate ED-visits
Time Frame: from 2 years before until 1 year after ED-visit (2014-2017)
influencing factors: sex, age, number of contacts to primary care physician, day and time of ED-admission, diagnoses, medication, admission mode, urgency.
from 2 years before until 1 year after ED-visit (2014-2017)
influencing factors on inadequate ED-visits
Time Frame: from 2 years before until 1 year after ED-visit (2014-2017)
influencing factors: sex, age, number of contacts to primary care physician, day and time of ED-admission, diagnoses, medication, admission mode, urgency.
from 2 years before until 1 year after ED-visit (2014-2017)
Exploratory analysis of influencing factors on increased health care costs.
Time Frame: from 2 years before until 1 year after ED-visit (2014-2017)
influencing factors: sex, age, number of contacts to primary care physician, day and time of ED-admission, diagnoses, medication, admission mode, urgency. Outcome will be treatment costs in the ambulatory sector as well as in-hospital diagnosis related group (DRG) for hospitalized patients
from 2 years before until 1 year after ED-visit (2014-2017)
Exploratory analysis of influencing factors on patient-related mortality
Time Frame: from 2 years before until 1 year after ED-visit (2014-2017)
influencing factors: sex, age, number of contacts to primary care physician, day and time of ED-admission, diagnoses, medication, admission mode, urgency. Outcome measure: mortality two years after the year of the ED-visit.
from 2 years before until 1 year after ED-visit (2014-2017)
Exploratory analysis of influencing factors on morbidity
Time Frame: from 2 years before until 1 year after ED-visit (2014-2017)
influencing factors: sex, age, number of contacts to primary care physician, day and time of ED-admission, diagnoses, medication, admission mode, urgency. Outcome measure: morbidity two years after the year of the ED-visit.
from 2 years before until 1 year after ED-visit (2014-2017)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2017

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

April 30, 2020

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

April 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 23, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 19, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

July 21, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

July 21, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 19, 2017

Last Verified

July 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • EA4/086/17

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data could be made available to other researchers on reasonable request and if data protection requirements are met.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Emergencies

Clinical Trials on data extraction

3
Subscribe