Multicenter Prospective Trial on Hemorrhoids

August 7, 2017 updated by: George Angelos, Stony Brook University

Multi-center, Non-randomized Prospective Observation Study Comparing Ferguson Hemorrhoidectomy and Transanal Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization (THD) for Prolapsed, Nonincarcerated, Reducible Hemorrhoids in Terms of 1-year Recurrence

This study will compare Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy and THD in terms of one-year recurrence in a large population (N=492). Recurrence is defined as prolapsing internal hemorrhoids at physical examination performed by a colorectal surgeon.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a multicenter, parallel arm, non-randomized prospective data collection trial comparing Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy and THD in terms of recurrence rates at one-year. All subjects will already be scheduled for either Ferguson or THD hemorrhoidectomy, the surgery is NOT part of the research. Although a randomized study would control for variation among surgeons, this study design provides the best patient safety since the surgeons will perform the technique they do most frequently. Variability in the patient population will be managed with a conservative sample size, which allows for a multivariate analysis of the sample populations if any confounding variables are noted during initial data analyses. In addition, the variability will be minimized with stringent and detailed inclusion/exclusion criteria in terms of hemorrhoidal disease. Patients will be enrolled and followed for one year. Participating surgeons will be credentialed and each participating surgeon will enroll up to ten consecutive patients.

The primary endpoint of this study is to compare Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy and THD in terms of recurrence rates at one-year. Recurrence is defined as prolapsing internal hemorrhoids at physical examination performed by a colorectal surgeon.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

492

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients presenting with prolapsed, non-incarcerated, reducible hemorrhoids in at least 3 columns at physical examination and scheduled for either Ferguson or THD hemorrhoidectomy.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patient must be:

  • At least 18 years-old
  • Able to sign informed consent
  • Presenting with prolapsed, non-incarcerated, reducible hemorrhoids in at least 3 columns at physical examination and scheduled for either Ferguson or THD hemorrhoidectomy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any prior anorectal surgery except for conventional office-based interventions (rubber band ligation, sclerotherapy, and infrared coagulation)
  • Prior pelvic radiotherapy
  • Inflammatory bowel diseases
  • Pre-existing fecal incontinence (Wexner score5 ≥8)
  • Pre-existing chronic anal diseases
  • Grades III and IV gynecological and obstetrical trauma per medical history and/or physical examination
  • Connective tissue disorders
  • Subject is pregnant
  • Subject is under incarceration

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Transanal hemorrhoid dearterialization (THD)
Patients with prolapsed, non-incarcerated, reducible hemorrhoids in at least 3 columns undergoing transanal hemorrhoid dearterialization (THD).
The hemorrhoids are operated in their natural position and not distorted by eversion The proctoscope is fully introduced transanally to reach the lower rectum. Under Doppler guidance, six arterial signals are found circumferentially above the dentate line. The approach to make the 'dearterialization' involves the transfixation of the rectal mucosa and submucosa to entrap the artery using a suture. Mucopexy is performed after the artery ligation with the same suture used for the dearterialization. Finally, the suture is tied to fix the mucopexy.
Other Names:
  • THD
Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy
Patients with prolapsed, non-incarcerated, reducible hemorrhoids in at least 3 columns undergoing Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy.
The hemorrhoids are operated in their natural position and not distorted by eversion. A Ferguson-Hill retractor is used to expose the hemorrhoids. Dissection with scissors is directed up to the dentate line where the fibers of the sphincter muscles are exposed and only a mucosal pedicle remains attached. A Buie-Smith crushing clamp is applied to this pedicle and the hemorrhoidal mass is excised at the superior level of the clamp. The pedicle is then ligated and the crushing clamp is removed. After dissection of the intermuscular septum is complete, the margins of the wound are drawn upward into the anal canal with stitches and are secured to the pedicle by the same suture. The remainder of the wound is closed with a stitch tied at the outer extremity of the wound using the same suture.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
1-year recurrence rates
Time Frame: 1-year
The primary endpoint of this study is to compare Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy and THD in terms of recurrence rates at one-year. Recurrence is defined as prolapsing internal hemorrhoids at physical examination performed by a colorectal surgeon.
1-year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative complications
Time Frame: 30 days
The secondary outcomes include postoperative complications (i.e. urinary retention, constipation, dysuria, pruritis ani, anal pain, anal stenosis, unhealed wound, fissure, fecal urgency, incontinence- flatus, incontinence- stool)
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: George Angelos, MD, Stony Brook University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 17, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 7, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

August 10, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 10, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

IPD will not be available to other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hemorrhoids

Clinical Trials on Transanal hemorrhoid dearterialization

3
Subscribe